Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs OpenText Documentum comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
IBM Blueworks Live support is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, with many users satisfied and rarely needing assistance.
Sentiment score
7.6
Camunda's customer service is praised for responsiveness and resources, though some desire better integration support and response times.
Sentiment score
6.0
OpenText's customer service is improving, though users experience occasional delays and limited support for older versions.
My involvement was not only user level, but development integration level also.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
IBM Blueworks Live lacks key features like improved import/export functions, better ERP integration, and enhanced reporting and analytics tools.
Sentiment score
4.7
Camunda users seek enhanced customization, internationalization, integration, training cost reduction, workflow tools, scalability, and better community support.
Sentiment score
5.1
OpenText Documentum faces challenges with outdated interface, performance, integration, customization, scalability, pricing, documentation, and AI integration.
It would be beneficial to have more ability to customize features for specific use cases.
After implementation, I was pleased with the functions of the application.
The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
IBM Blueworks Live is scalable for large organizations, accommodating many users with flexibility and a straightforward learning curve.
Sentiment score
7.0
Camunda excels in scalability with proper architecture, though database management and documentation could be improved for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum excels in scalability, supporting numerous users and offering integration flexibility for large-scale implementations.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM Blueworks Live provides scalable, cost-effective enterprise solutions with flexible pricing and minimal setup fees, including free subscription options.
Sentiment score
6.1
Camunda provides a more affordable solution with free open-source and paid enterprise options, ideal for various business needs.
Sentiment score
4.0
OpenText Documentum's pricing is high, complex, and varies, though recent improvements offer affordability and benefits for government agencies.
Overall, it offers a lot of functionalities for the price point.
It is quite expensive.
The licensing price is quite high.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.3
IBM Blueworks Live is praised for stability, high availability, and autosave, with minor concerns about cloud informational privacy.
Sentiment score
8.3
Camunda is highly stable and reliable, though specific integrations can affect performance under heavy load, earning high stability ratings.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum is stable and reliable, with minor sub-product issues, earning high user ratings in the ECM market.
after the deployment, we found the system to be reliable.
For example, database connections could be improved.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
IBM Blueworks Live offers intuitive real-time modeling, collaboration, BPMN 2.0 support, and cloud-based process management for efficient documentation.
Sentiment score
8.3
Camunda offers a flexible, user-friendly platform for efficient process automation, supporting BPMN, CMMN, DMN standards, and seamless integration.
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText Documentum ensures secure, scalable content management with integration, versioning, and compliance, supporting efficient business processes across departments.
The most valuable feature is the good automation engine, which helps in reducing the development cost and allows easy development of applications.
Version Tree Branching allows for simultaneous collaborative work on different versions of a document.
The product is user-friendly.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Blueworks Live
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (12th)
Camunda
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st)
OpenText Documentum
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Business Process Design
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

AjarMathur - PeerSpot reviewer
An easily scalable and affordable solution that enables users to document and digitize processes with ease
IBM Blueworks is BPMN 2.0 compliant, but it does not adapt to the overarching BPMN 2.0 concepts. There is only one kind of BPMN 2.0 diagram. It is a process diagram. It doesn't have the concept of separate tools, which other products offer. If I had to do a hardcore BPMN 2.0 modeling, the product would have its own reservations. There were features we could not explore from a BPMN 2.0 perspective. Most of the time, people who are shifting from Microsoft Office tools to a digitized way of working still want the reporting capabilities to be strong. Some tools, like ARIS or Signavio, offer customized solutions from the reporting perspective. If I have documented my whole finance process and want to fetch out a complete SOP report in a very customized manner, IBM Blueworks cannot provide it. We have to rely on some other services. So that's one area in which we always struggled, how to really customize the reporting aspects. I understand that we need to keep the tool a little more asset-light. It's very difficult to keep adding many options, but at least a few BPMN 2.0 options were needed. We have been suggesting to IBM that we should have some way of customizing the reporting. At least we should get a custom way of reporting it into different formats like Excel or putting up a logo for one of the clients so that their SAP can be printed that way.
Peter Broucke - PeerSpot reviewer
Support is good (even the basic one), documentation is readily available and matches the need for agile development
Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow. I know they're working on that or at least communicating about it. They already have versions to run on the cloud, so they've tackled that. We're looking at what they will come up with otherwise. As long as the product gets enough traction and evolves, we're happy. With open source, you can monitor what's happening. If the product is being left by many customers, that's a sign. We're also users of Camunda, and you can watch one of our guides' presentations in the States about one of our implementations. Our focus now is on developing service management and DMN APIs for the platform. AI is something we take into consideration, but we'll see what additional benefits it could bring and how to interconnect it with our data or AI engineering.
Kabir Jakkamsetti - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be used to automate the storage of metadata and content, but it add some AI integrations
I think security's been pretty good with OpenText Documentum. Currently, we are on an older product, and we are about to start a migration. I think the configurability should be much more improved with that. OpenText Documentum has helped boost productivity within our organization. By automating a lot of business processes with workflows, we've been able to improve productivity. OpenText Documentum has definitely helped simplify or accelerate our modernization journey. Overall, I rate OpenText Documentum a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Blueworks Live?
The solution is easy to operate. Also, there is an automatic mode to make the business flow. You don't have to put an...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Blueworks Live?
The solution costs around 600-700 dollars/year, which is quite affordable.
What needs improvement with IBM Blueworks Live?
Sometimes, the tool is automatic, which can complicate it, but once you're accustomed to manipulating it, you can use...
How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With B...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Documentum?
It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of gr...
What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?
The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on ...
What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?
The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

IBM Lombardi Blueprint
Camunda BPM
Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cloudsoft Corp. Ltd., Bayer, S¾SS, Essex County Council
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design. Updated: November 2024.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.