Camunda vs OpenText Documentum comparison

"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."

"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."

"The solution is good for data models."

"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."

"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."

"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."

"Camunda is a scalable product."

"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."

"OpenText Documentum is a robust choice for enterprise-level document management."

"It is quite good."

"The most impactful thing is the size, which is almost 25 TB."

"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."

"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."

"I recommend Documentum as it supports big systems and offers good integration."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."

"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."

"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."

"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."

"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."

"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."

"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."

"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."

"The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant."

"While generally secure, some noted security issues need consideration. The installation process for on-premise setup needs improvement as well."

"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."

"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."

"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."

"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."

"There is a bit of scope for improvement in how the licensing and pricing are done. They are based on the number of processing instances you execute on the cluster... but on the self-hosted mode, the pricing model should be customized."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"Camunda's pricing is good."

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

"OpenText Documentum's pricing is good."

"OpenText Documentum has announced a new licensing model, which could be more expensive."

"It is quite an expensive product."

"The price is considered affordable now."

"The product is expensive."

"It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad."