Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Unified Communications vs Mitel Application Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Unified Communications
Ranking in Unified Communications
1st
Ranking in IP Telephony & Unified Communications
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mitel Application Suite
Ranking in Unified Communications
8th
Ranking in IP Telephony & Unified Communications
5th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Unified Communications category, the mindshare of Cisco Unified Communications is 13.9%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mitel Application Suite is 5.4%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Unified Communications
 

Featured Reviews

Kani Kumar J - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 26, 2024
Reliable customer communication and good third-party integrations with minor server update issues
It is basically a contact center solution. In contact centers, it acts as a bridge connecting the customer and the product company and the end customer. For example, if we are running a bank, the customer needs information, they will use different mediums to communicate with the bank, like via…
it_user325977 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 9, 2015
It provided a work-from-home solution, replacing both a land line and cell phone, that was easy to install and to administrate.
Ease of installation and administration Had a collegue that needed a phone solution for Work-from-Home. He didn't want to use his land line and the cell phone coverage was spotty at best. After only a few questions about installation, he was able to connect the Mitel and hit the ground running.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Communications solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco Unified Communications?
Sometimes, minor temporary issues can arise while updating the servers. These updates can cause bugs that lead to temporary issues. Although they do not have a major impact, these issues still need...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Unified Communications?
It is basically a contact center solution. In contact centers, it acts as a bridge connecting the customer and the product company and the end customer. For example, if we are running a bank, the c...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Unified Communications?
The pricing varies based on the setup. ECCX has lower pricing for up to 400 users, whereas PCC is more expensive. Pricing increases based on requirements and features.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Afni, Allied Irish Banks, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital Colorado, Erickson Living, IDEALondon, Instituto Zaldivar, John Lewis, Linz AG, London Hydro, Lone Star College System, Lone Star College System, Mondi Group, North West Redwater, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, Pilatus, Pirelli, Portugal Ministry, Presidio Inc., Republic Bank & Trust Company, Saipem, SickKids Foundation, Top Right Group, Vital Images
Carlsberg Breweries, Hyatt Hotels, Louvre-Lens, Firmdale Hotels, Starwood Hotels and Resorts, Banfield Pet Hospital
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, 3CX, Kamailio and others in Unified Communications. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.