Cloudian HyperIQ vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Cloudian and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cloudian is ranked #78, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Cloudian holds a 0.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

Cloudian HyperIQ

Read 1 Cloudian HyperIQ review

405 Views
405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 113 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

11,368 Views
6,707 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cloudian HyperIQ

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Cloudian HyperIQ are competing products in IT infrastructure monitoring and data analytics. Cloudian HyperIQ seems to have the upper hand with its advanced feature set, appealing to those investing in greater capabilities.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring tools, a wide array of sensors, and detailed alert configurations. Cloudian HyperIQ offers analytics for storage data, deep insights into infrastructure performance, and robust data analysis capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudian HyperIQ streamlines deployment with strong technical support for integration into complex environments. PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward installation, extensive documentation, and effective customer support, though it may require more learning initially.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive pricing with scalable options and efficient monitoring solutions. Cloudian HyperIQ demands a higher initial investment but yields significant ROI with its advanced analytics capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,656 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

78th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperIQ is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PRTG Network Monitor	4.1%
Cloudian HyperIQ	0.3%
Other	95.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna

Senior Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Consultant at Cgi Deutschland KG

Includes a Grafana dashboard that helps to improve monitoring and reporting

The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership.

Read full review

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility

The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."

"The sensors and remote probes are phenomenal. We use them for all of our global sites. The problem with our global sites are that they are all VPNs. If the link goes down, you can't monitor other solutions, as it just goes off the grid. Having remote probes allows them to still carry on and get the information that we need when it comes back up, sending the information to us."

"The technical support seems to be quick, clever, and has a comprehensive knowledge base online, which is fantastic."

"The solution provides us with needed feedback on our IT infrastructure. It gives us really good quality of service when it comes to monitoring of available space and available resources. It allows us to preempt issues before they become a problem for the business."

"What I've found most valuable is the custom sensor, which allows you to write scripts or code to monitor a specific metric in your environment."

"The email notifications are helpful, and the dashboards are user-friendly for people with little network monitoring knowledge."

"Stable and scalable network monitoring tool. Installation is simple and straightforward."

"Accessibility, ease of use (Web GUI, MobileApps). In general, compared with other software"

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."

"The free version only gives us 100 free sensors to use. It would be nice if there was double that."

"PRTG Network Monitor could improve the price."

"More training videos for installing and configuring this software would have been nice, especially when working with a lot of devices."

"I would like a more straightforward ability to create dashboards and maps. The network maps should be a bit more flexibility in the GUI to do what we need to do."

"The licensing policy needs more flexibility."

"The scalability of this solution could improve as well as the automated provisioning of the infrastructure."

"A room for improvement in PRTG Network Monitor is its sensors. Its application technology sensor, such as the IAS, .NET, etc., needs some improvement because it doesn't work as expected. For example, the IAS sensor doesn't give immediate information, and the information you get from it isn't of good value. The web GUI of PRTG Network Monitor also needs improvement because errors keep popping up if it's not been updated to the latest version. What I'd like to see in the next release of the tool is end-to-end topology mapping for the business model, and that should be required. There has to be a technical map. Technical mapping and topological creation are missing in PRTG Network Monitor, so I would like to see those in the future."

"We've had some issues previously with the performance of the sensors. We tend to deploy quite a bit of WMI, which is quite processor-intensive, and we've found that that impacts the sensors quite a bit."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap."

"We pay nothing for it. Its 100 sensors have allowed us to put a magnifying glass on some systems, providing an extra layer of detail. Therefore, our outgoing is nothing and our incoming is a lot of useful data that we can react to proactively."

"Licenses are very expensive, so I would like to see cheaper licensing."

"On a yearly basis, I believe it's between £1,200 and £1,500."

"We have an unlimited license for this solution."

"The scalability is there, but smaller companies might need CAM software to be able afford the product."

"PRTG is now available as PRTG Enterprise Monitor, and the price varies depending on the total number of sensors the customer buys"

"The pricing for PRTG in our case is reasonable because we have a lot of applications to monitor within PRTG. It is not that expensive."

"The price of PRTG Network Monitor is reasonable for the features that the solution provides. They charge you per monitoring, not per node, it is per port that you need for a device."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	50

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The pricing was higher at the beginning, but the recurring licensing cost is affordable and reasonable. Overall, the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fair for our industry. They have quoted us...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ

Compared 38% of the time

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cloudian HyperIQ

Compared 17% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Cloudian HyperIQ

Compared 14% of the time

More Cloudian HyperIQ Competitors

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

SCOM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Cloudian HyperIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

February 2026

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Also Known As

HyperIQ

No data available

Overview

Gain operational insights with Cloudian HyperIQ, a monitoring and predictive analysis tool. View data from across your Cloudian environment, including storage and networking. Set thresholds and alerts to highlight potential issues and identify corrective action. Within a single site or across multiple locations, HyperIQ gives you real-time insights.

Cloudian

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

University of Leicester, NTT Communications ICT Solutions , City of Montebello, WGBH Boston , Italian Service Provider Zuchetti Informatica

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.