No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cloudian HyperIQ vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Cloudian and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cloudian is ranked #78, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6. Cloudian holds a 0.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.
Cloudian HyperIQ
Read 1 Cloudian HyperIQ review
  • 529 Views
  • 524 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
PRTG Network Monitor
Read 113 PRTG Network Monitor reviews
  • 13,085 Views
  • 7,982 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

PRTG Network Monitor and Cloudian HyperIQ are competing products in the network monitoring and management space. PRTG Network Monitor has an edge in terms of pricing and support, while Cloudian HyperIQ is recognized for its superior features, which justify its cost.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor provides robust network visualization, bandwidth monitoring, and flexible alert mechanisms. Cloudian HyperIQ offers advanced data analytics, visualizations, and is tailored for hybrid-cloud environments. Cloudian HyperIQ's analytics-oriented approach is suited for data-heavy tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Cloudian HyperIQ, although complex to deploy, is supported by comprehensive guidance and specialized support. Cloudian focuses on detailed assistance despite potential initial complexity.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor is a cost-effective solution with a favorable ROI for budget-conscious enterprises. Cloudian HyperIQ requires a higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term ROI through enhanced capabilities and analytics. The pricing variance highlights Cloudian HyperIQ's emphasis on offering advanced data-driven insights, while PRTG provides a quick return on a lower investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 886,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperIQ
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
78th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PRTG Network Monitor
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperIQ is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 3.8%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PRTG Network Monitor3.8%
Cloudian HyperIQ0.3%
Other95.9%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna - PeerSpot reviewer
Kiran Rajanna
Senior Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Consultant at Cgi Deutschland KG
Includes a Grafana dashboard that helps to improve monitoring and reporting
The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership.
Read full review
madhan kumar hs - PeerSpot reviewer
madhan kumar hs
software engineer at Capgemini
Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility
The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."
"The feature set is very strong compared to other products that I have used; it's great because it does everything that we need it to do, it's easy to use, and it looks great when you present it in an open office environment."
"The best feature is that it lets me know what is going on. I need to know if something has gone down, I need to know if something is running very slowly. PRTG tells me that."
"Its initial setup process is fast and easy."
"We did some research, found PRTG, and I spoke to another company that used it, they really loved it so we went ahead got the free license initially, did a trial, found it absolutely amazing, and then bought it."
"The most valuable features of PRTG Network Monitor are bandwidth utilization, user-friendliness, all past report simple retrievals, and timeout features."
"What I've found most valuable is the custom sensor, which allows you to write scripts or code to monitor a specific metric in your environment."
"PRTG Network Monitor offers a single-pane dashboard where we can monitor all the servers on one single screen, helping our team detect a failed server quickly and saving time that was previously spent checking each server manually, which in turn also reduces downtime."
"The remote probes are very useful. They allow us to provide a reference across different areas in the network. In trying to localize issues, that's very useful."
More PRTG Network Monitor pros
 

Cons

"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."
"Can be slow in the way it polls the different engines."
"PRTG Network Monitor could improve by having descriptions for the tab usages. The dashboards or interface could be easier to understand."
"Sometimes the error messages are too vague and don't directly tell me what went wrong."
"In a very few cases, customers want more detailed reports, which we cannot meet."
"The only sort of limitation is the actual probes. So, if you don't have enough probes on there, you can over flip them and cause the WMI sensors and SNMP sensors to sort of overload. Sometimes, they might timeout for a minute, but they do come back."
"I would like the ability to monitor Cisco IRS devices."
"Integration into service management ticketing systems could be better. They should simplify the integration into big service management platforms like ServiceNow, Remedy, and Cherwell. They're really into monitoring, but they don't do any self-resolution. It would be better if the company moved more into the AIOps space so that you could actually kick off some remedies. I know that you can execute some commands from the tool, but you need to develop those all yourself. It would be really handy if they had some auto-remedy scripts that they could develop on top."
"The inventory of the device should be improved."
More PRTG Network Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap."
"I'm paying something like €1000 per year for the maintenance. I've got unlimited sensors."
"When you have a lot of devices, PRTG Network Monitor can be costly."
"We pay for a perpetual license and we have a support fee."
"PRTG Network Monitor is not that expensive, so I like it cost-wise. There's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I would rate the cost of PRTG Network Monitor a two."
"If you are not too sure about it, try the free version. Then, if you like it, you can go to the paid version and roll it out."
"We have an unlimited license for this solution."
"At the moment I'm only using 500 sensors. I pay yearly, so it's a cost that's easily swallowed."
"We've got the unlimited package... I believe it was around the £15,000 per year mark."
More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user174738
IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business59
Midsize Enterprise19
Large Enterprise50
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?
The pricing was higher at the beginning, but the recurring licensing cost is affordable and reasonable. Overall, the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fair for our industry. They have quoted us...
See all answers
What needs improvement with PRTG Network Monitor?
The reporting features look very technical and that can be improved. If they can change the report so everyone can understand it, that would be helpful.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ Logo
Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ
Compared 34% of the time
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cloudian HyperIQ Logo
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cloudian HyperIQ
Compared 14% of the time
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Cloudian HyperIQ Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Cloudian HyperIQ
Compared 12% of the time
Zabbix vs Cloudian HyperIQ Logo
Zabbix vs Cloudian HyperIQ
Compared 11% of the time
More Cloudian HyperIQ Competitors
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 4% of the time
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 4% of the time
Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 3% of the time
SCOM vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 3% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 3% of the time
More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2026
Cloudian HyperIQ reportDownload Cloudian HyperIQ product report
Buyer's Guide
PRTG Network Monitor
March 2026
PRTG Network Monitor reportDownload PRTG Network Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

HyperIQ
No data available
 

Overview

Gain operational insights with Cloudian HyperIQ, a monitoring and predictive analysis tool. View data from across your Cloudian environment, including storage and networking. Set thresholds and alerts to highlight potential issues and identify corrective action. Within a single site or across multiple locations, HyperIQ gives you real-time insights.

Cloudian

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH
 

Sample Customers

University of Leicester, NTT Communications ICT Solutions , City of Montebello, WGBH Boston , Italian Service Provider Zuchetti Informatica
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.