Cloudian HyperIQ vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Cloudian and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cloudian is ranked #78, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Cloudian holds a 0.3% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

Cloudian HyperIQ

Read 1 Cloudian HyperIQ review

405 Views
405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 113 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

11,368 Views
6,707 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cloudian HyperIQ

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Cloudian HyperIQ are competing products in IT infrastructure monitoring and data analytics. Cloudian HyperIQ seems to have the upper hand with its advanced feature set, appealing to those investing in greater capabilities.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring tools, a wide array of sensors, and detailed alert configurations. Cloudian HyperIQ offers analytics for storage data, deep insights into infrastructure performance, and robust data analysis capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudian HyperIQ streamlines deployment with strong technical support for integration into complex environments. PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward installation, extensive documentation, and effective customer support, though it may require more learning initially.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive pricing with scalable options and efficient monitoring solutions. Cloudian HyperIQ demands a higher initial investment but yields significant ROI with its advanced analytics capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

78th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperIQ is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PRTG Network Monitor	4.1%
Cloudian HyperIQ	0.3%
Other	95.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna

Senior Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Consultant at Cgi Deutschland KG

Includes a Grafana dashboard that helps to improve monitoring and reporting

The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership.

Read full review

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility

The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."

"Every monitoring session features similar capabilities."

"The solution is scalable."

"The feature whereby it shows when my hard drives are moving towards thresholds that would be considered outages, before they reach that point - that is valuable."

"It improves the status of my infrastructure, from networking devices to real-time machines."

"The up-to-date graphs and the history are very good."

"We have asked questions of their technical support and they have a very good response time."

"It's very easy to manage when you've got time to do some work on it: things like adding devices, adding groups, adding sensor clusters, and being able to clone and move stuff around."

"The sensors and probes are great, nice and lightweight, they don't take up too many resources on the system. We just deploy them out and they start reporting instantly."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."

"There are some vendor-specific sensors in PRTG Network Monitor, particularly for older hardware, that don't always provide consistent results."

"The operations dashboard is only available in PRTG's enterprise version, but I wish it could be accessed in the standard licensing. It would also be nice if PRTG had templates for dashboard monitoring, software monitoring, etc. It can help me set up a dashboard because now we don't have a template from PRTG, so we need to create one from scratch."

"The icons on PRTG's network diagram are hard to find. For example, finding the icons for firewalls and servers is difficult, so we're struggling to create the network topology."

"We have had a few issues with the web elements, as far as the dashboard. With the dashboard, it has to be manually refreshed. Occasionally, we reboot the server, or at least web services, due to the web aspect."

"Users need to buy the more expensive licenses if they expect to be able to scale."

"Other monitoring tools that I have used are easier to use."

"The remote probes seem to be a little bit buggy at times. They just stop working or they say they can't communicate. What we tend to do to is install the remote app onto the servers that we use. That seems to clear it up."

"Sometimes, our PRTG Network Monitor system crashes and a lot of sensors go down."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap."

"I'm paying something like €1000 per year for the maintenance. I've got unlimited sensors."

"We've got 1,000 nodes and I believe it's a few hundred quid a month."

"There is a license to use PRTG Network Monitor and it is annually."

"It is about £4,500 for the first year, then about another 15 to 20 percent annually after that. So, we are looking at about £1000 running costs a year. When you think about how much an outage costs per minute, it's negligible."

"The price is actually on the cheaper side. If you're going with the unlimited license code, it's very cheap compared to competitors unless you're going for something free, like Zabbix. But you get what you pay for, and it doesn't have the full suite of products or tools like SolarWinds or a ScienceLogic."

"We've got the unlimited package... I believe it was around the £15,000 per year mark."

"Pricing for PRTG Network Monitor is a nine out of ten. It meets my company's budget and monitoring requirements. My company is on a perpetual license."

"We have an unlimited license for this solution."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	50

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The pricing was higher at the beginning, but the recurring licensing cost is affordable and reasonable. Overall, the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fair for our industry. They have quoted us...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ

Compared 45% of the time

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Cloudian HyperIQ

Compared 20% of the time

More Cloudian HyperIQ Competitors

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

SCOM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Cloudian HyperIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

February 2026

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Also Known As

HyperIQ

No data available

Overview

Gain operational insights with Cloudian HyperIQ, a monitoring and predictive analysis tool. View data from across your Cloudian environment, including storage and networking. Set thresholds and alerts to highlight potential issues and identify corrective action. Within a single site or across multiple locations, HyperIQ gives you real-time insights.

Cloudian

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

University of Leicester, NTT Communications ICT Solutions , City of Montebello, WGBH Boston , Italian Service Provider Zuchetti Informatica

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.