Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cloudian HyperIQ vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Cloudian and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cloudian is ranked #39 with an average rating of 10.0, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8. Cloudian holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.
Cloudian HyperIQ
Read 1 Cloudian HyperIQ review
  • 123 Views
  • 87 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
PRTG Network Monitor
Read 101 PRTG Network Monitor reviews
  • 6,499 Views
  • 4,437 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Cloudian HyperIQ are competing in the network monitoring and data analytics domain. Cloudian HyperIQ seems to have the upper hand due to its feature richness, offering more perceived value.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor offers a robust alerting system, scalability, and integration capabilities, providing a comprehensive monitoring solution. Cloudian HyperIQ delivers advanced data analytics tools and real-time visualization, making it suitable for efficiently handling large data sets. The main difference is Cloudian HyperIQ's advanced analytics capabilities, which cater to organizations with complex data needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is known for its straightforward installation and reliable customer support, ensuring smooth deployment. Cloudian HyperIQ, while providing comprehensive deployment options, may require more setup time but benefits from proactive customer service. The primary distinction is PRTG Network Monitor’s easy installation compared to Cloudian HyperIQ's detailed configuration needs.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor provides a cost-effective setup with significant ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Cloudian HyperIQ, though requiring more upfront investment, balances its cost with high functionality and long-term benefits. The key difference is PRTG Network Monitor's affordable setup versus Cloudian HyperIQ's higher initial cost, offset by superior long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperIQ
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
39th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PRTG Network Monitor
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
101
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperIQ is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.3%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna - PeerSpot reviewer
Includes a Grafana dashboard that helps to improve monitoring and reporting
The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership.
Read full review
Tochukwu Uzomba - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently monitor networks across regions with seamless setup and robust feature set
PRTG Network Monitor is easy to set up. Within a few minutes, it is operational. It is an all-in-one monitoring solution without extra costs. For example, we set it up for an insurance company with branches across Africa. We are able to monitor from Lagos without installing anything in the branches, using the agentless feature. We just put in the IP address and the parameter, and we monitor from those ends. Additionally, all the sensors are very useful. Most people are interested in the bandwidth monitoring sensor to see what bandwidth the users are consuming. The pricing is affordable compared to SolarWinds.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least three months."
"It gives me a live view of the traffic on the WAN."
"One of its valuable features is the fact that it handles multiple operating systems... And I like the fact that it tells me when things are about to fall over, which means I can preempt it and not have to wake up at three in the morning to fix it."
"PRTG is relatively intuitive and fairly straightforward. It has net flow monitoring and that works all right. I would describe it as a decent middle-of-the-road solution."
"I can create my own program sensor. This means I can add extra monitoring capabilities into the already fundamentally strong foundation."
"It is great for service level agreements and can comply fully with internet monitoring or any interface."
"PRTG is integrated on Windows."
"Good compilation of the system's information."
"PRTG Network Monitor is user-friendly and offers flexible alerting systems."
More PRTG Network Monitor pros
 

Cons

"The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separate Docker volumes in the installation script. The documentation for reporting needs to be improved. I am not able to generate reports using it. The alert mechanisms also need to be improved. It should integrate with AI and give more metrics to be taken up next year. We can show the response peak as an improvement to our leadership."
"PRTG Network Monitor could improve interaction with customers by offering direct support involvement instead of just mail responses."
"PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time. There are very limited features as compared to other solutions."
"I would like a more straightforward ability to create dashboards and maps. The network maps should be a bit more flexibility in the GUI to do what we need to do."
"We would like to monitor certain aspects of the user experience. We should be able to analyze the cause of end user experience, bad or good, so we can do some research and development on our own."
"The licensing policy needs more flexibility."
"They could improve the process of updating the license."
"We're using more cloud services now. It would be useful to be able to get information back from these cloud services in detail, and display any issues within PRTG for the rest of our systems."
"More training videos for installing and configuring this software would have been nice, especially when working with a lot of devices."
More PRTG Network Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap."
"The pricing is okay and it is cheaper than some competing products."
"PRTG Network Monitor is not that expensive, so I like it cost-wise. There's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I would rate the cost of PRTG Network Monitor a two."
"We bought a license for 4000 sensors."
"We pay for PRTG Network Monitor annually. The price is approximately 10,000 rupees annually."
"The scalability is there, but smaller companies might need CAM software to be able afford the product."
"Right now, the smallest sensor pack that they have is just a bit out of range for me, as a business. This kills me, as I need the product. Therefore, there is always a balance between needing to buy it or continuing their free version."
"We are licensed for 2500 endpoints."
"We pay nothing for it. Its 100 sensors have allowed us to put a magnifying glass on some systems, providing an extra layer of detail. Therefore, our outgoing is nothing and our incoming is a lot of useful data that we can react to proactively."
More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
52%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudian HyperIQ?
The tool has a very good interface and helps to monitor the nodes and resources. The most valuable feature is the S3 dashboard. It helps in migration, and we can monitor the data for at least thre...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudian HyperIQ?
Cloudian HyperIQ's licensing is cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperIQ?
The installation process needs to be improved, and the tool needs a better script. Cloudian HyperIQ runs on Docker containers. Sometimes, the file system gets filled. The tool needs to have separat...
See all answers
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...
See all answers
What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?
The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor. That's why I'm using the free100 sensor license.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ Logo
Nagios XI vs Cloudian HyperIQ
Compared 100% of the time
More Cloudian HyperIQ Competitors
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 7% of the time
LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 7% of the time
PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2025
Cloudian HyperIQ reportDownload Cloudian HyperIQ product report
Buyer's Guide
PRTG Network Monitor
March 2025
PRTG Network Monitor reportDownload PRTG Network Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

HyperIQ
No data available
 

Overview

Gain operational insights with Cloudian HyperIQ, a monitoring and predictive analysis tool. View data from across your Cloudian environment, including storage and networking. Set thresholds and alerts to highlight potential issues and identify corrective action. Within a single site or across multiple locations, HyperIQ gives you real-time insights.

Cloudian

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH
 

Sample Customers

University of Leicester, NTT Communications ICT Solutions , City of Montebello, WGBH Boston , Italian Service Provider Zuchetti Informatica
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.