Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ControlUp vs SysTrack comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

ControlUp
Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (35th)
SysTrack
Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of ControlUp is 14.2%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SysTrack is 25.2%, up from 23.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Richasvi Tripathi - PeerSpot reviewer
Used to monitor several devices, but most reports do not give information of all the devices
We have approximately 10 to 20 feature requests pending on the vendor side. Most reports give information about the top 100 devices, but not all of the devices. In our case, we are monitoring 200000 devices. So, we need details for all those devices, but that is limited to 100, which they have improved to an extent in some reports. I'm thinking of one feature request for ISPs because the dashboard does not provide a detailed list of ISPs, and it provides the wrong list. I feel some firewall issues are blocking that, and the team cannot send that detail. That may be the case. One feature request pending on the vendor side is the data format change. Once you see a detail in the report, it is mentioned in some other format, which is hard to analyze sometimes.
Pawel Grabowski - PeerSpot reviewer
Is easy to deploy but is not user-friendly and provides false data
When I started working with it, it appeared to be a good tool, but after all these years, I have concluded that it does not have the best design. It does collect a lot of metrics, but those metrics are not genuine or precise. When you compare the metrics collected by another software to those collected by SysTrack, the latter do not reflect the actual state of the devices. That is, what SysTrack is providing you is false data. This is one of the reasons why we will be decommissioning SysTrack. We're piloting a new solution right now. SysTrack is a reactive tool. There's very little in terms of the proactive area of investigations. You can tell afterwards the reason why an issue occurred, but there isn't anything you can do to prevent that issue from happening again. The interface needs to be improved because it looks ancient. If you have been working in IT for a long time, over 20 years, you might remember products from the start of your career that look almost identical to the way SysTrack looks now. The user interface is not user-friendly. When you first see the solution, it overwhelms you with everything. It's not easy to use, and it's not that intuitive. In terms of data collection, all the metrics are combined into packages or groups, which you can disable or enable, but you can't do it on an individual basis. For instance, if you want to collect just the space usage on a hard drive, you have to collect every single metric that is related to the hard drive including all the IOPS or all the conditions of the hard drive. It's not very flexible in that aspect, even though at first glance it appears as though it has huge capabilities to do so. There is one aspect that allows you to create your own data sets and start collecting them, but those are totally independent of the built-in data sets. So, if you want to enhance some metrics, then you actually have to double the data that you collect because you essentially want to have some metric collected in a different way or have it in a different dataset. It forces you to double the data collection. However, I've been told that this may be withdrawn from the solution as it develops the ability to create custom data sets. You can create your own custom dashboards, but they're static. In comparison, other solutions, including simple ones, allow you to play with the dashboard and apply filters. SysTrack dashboards are very static and not easy to customize. You have to be an advanced user to customize your dashboard, but you can't apply all the filters and focuses on the fly. You have to redevelop the dashboard every single time. There are some filtering capabilities and search capabilities, but they're very basic. I've been told they're going to abandon this in future releases as well. Documentation-wise, this product is not good. There is some documentation, but you don't have the documentation release dates, and the screenshots may even come from an earlier version. Some documents such those on scalability are missing. The few documents that are available are chaotic and not up to date, even to the point where some, especially in the requirements sections, contradict each other.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ControlUp is beneficial as it provides a web interface through which you can access all your infrastructure—servers, devices, and VDI infrastructure—all on the same platform. It supports gathering all infrastructure components in a single, unified dashboard. This helps you identify performance issues or high resource utilization, allowing quick troubleshooting. I appreciate the solid interface that ControlUp offers."
"Integration with Netscaler and Scoutbees can provide a proper end-to-end analysis of the user's experience and give us a real ROI."
"The most valuable features in ControlUp are endpoint monitoring and the many features that are available."
"ControlUp has an easy installation process."
"The most valuable feature is the granularity of visibility into the resources that are in use by our applications."
"It has a great career time monitoring tool."
"When using ControlUp, the core feature that we have found valuable is its UI. It is a valuable tool to view the analysis reactions of a base core Level 2 or Level 1 team so that they can complete the necessary troubleshooting."
"It shows you so many details of what's going on in that log-on that, if there's a problem, you can identify it in five minutes."
"SysTrack monitors user experience and represents it in the form of a composite score. The scores are placed on a timeline, so you can see how it has gotten better or worse compared to two weeks ago. It gives you a score at the personal, unit, and organizational levels. For example, the score for my entire organization in SysTrack is 77. It's also effective for monitoring user experience and resources in a VDI environment."
"When you search for a machine or a user, the way we get the information is very helpful. The GUI provides us with all the information about that machine that a user is accessing. It tells us about the CPU, memory, etc. The GUI and the details provided are very helpful."
"I am impressed with the huge amount of information that you can get from the infrastructure."
"SysTrack provides unique, real-time data."
"SysTrack gathers a lot of different metrics on every single device including performance metrics and application-related metrics such as application usage and resource utilization by applications. It collects a wide range of different metrics, and from that perspective, it's a really good tool."
"When a user calls in and says that they are having slowness issues, this tool has the capability to show exactly where the performance issue is. The Resolve feature that they have is very good. It is one of the main features. They are doing a pretty good job with the Resolve feature in terms of showing endpoint performance on various factors."
"The visualizer feature provides end-to-end analysis on all the machines."
"The Resolve part is valuable. It allows the service desk team to perform a couple of fixes or things to mitigate an incident before it's escalated to L2 or L3. It's a cool feature. If you have the sensor activity for Outlook and something has gone wrong, even the service desk can take those steps."
 

Cons

"There was some lag earlier, and reports pulled from the dashboard would sometimes be half an hour old. But now, the information provides real-time status, which is greatly appreciated. Overall, I've seen improvement in the product."
"Something I would love to see from a partner perspective would be maybe a way to do this in a surface hosting provider."
"This solution be improved by including load throttling tools. For example, I can identify a service where we spend a lot of CPU but I cannot restrict the service from ControlUp. I have to use another tool like AppSense."
"Integration is always a problem, and we feel that we are doing our best and the service provider thinks they are doing their best. I guess if ControlUp's system could be more capable or if people could understand the integration part, that would be better."
"Most reports give information about the top 100 devices, but not all of the devices."
"ControlUp could improve the integration. Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop monitoring has better integration."
"It can be improved by including script-based scheduling."
"Solve is a quick and intuitive tool for quickly mapping data together, however, once you have the view of the data that you like, it is difficult to share this with colleagues."
"When I create a dashboard for a computer-based GPO or user-based GPO, I get details of all the GPOs, but the feature that we found missing is that SysTrack doesn't state how many seconds were required to apply a GPO. It doesn't tell us how many nanoseconds, seconds, or minutes it is taking to process or apply a GPO on a machine. This feature is not there. When there are major issues, if we have the processing time in place, it will help us to identify whether it could be an issue with the domain controller or something else. It would give us a clear understanding to engage other teams for resolving the issue."
"The interface needs to be improved because it looks ancient. If you have been working in IT for a long time, over 20 years, you might remember products from the start of your career that look almost identical to the way SysTrack looks now. The user interface is not user-friendly. When you first see the solution, it overwhelms you with everything. It's not easy to use, and it's not that intuitive."
"Certain features haven't been tested sufficiently and don't work well."
"If they can integrate some kind of remote administration tool, like the LogMeIn tool, it would be helpful for the DDS team members, as well as for the global team members. We need not search for an additional tool for troubleshooting purposes. Currently, we are using one tool for governance and then we have SysTrack for monitoring the endpoints. There are two tools, and we are spending money on both."
"Lacks flexibility with regard to licensing."
"Their dashboard could be better. They did it custom, which is the main problem. They should have given an option to integrate it with some of the tools such as Power BI. Unfortunately, they are developing their own native dashboarding capabilities, which is killing them, in my view. The product is good, but dashboarding has been a pain area. I have to literally learn a new BI or dashboarding solution just for a system. We have 100 such kinds of solutions in our environment. If every solution has its custom solution for dashboarding, we can't survive. It is going to be crazy."
"The tool needs to improve the integration with third-party providers like Cisco products."
"The solution lacks AI in its analysis module."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Personally, I would say that the only thing I could compare it to is another monitoring tool that we use, Nagios."
"Based on my experience, ControlUp is not that expensive."
"We are satisfied with the price compared to other solutions."
"If you compare cloud solutions to SysTrack, which is on-premises, then SysTrack is cheaper. If you compare the cost of SysTrack with that of other similar solutions, the cost is similar. For each master server, there's a license. In terms of end user devices, the licenses are sold in multiplications of 10. That's one upfront cost. Once you procure the license, you can use the software for as long as you like. The maintenance is sold on an annual basis. Additional costs are related to hosting and include a SQL server license and Windows server licenses."
"It is somewhat expensive."
"It is on a per-device basis. It is not on a per-user basis. I was not much engaged in the licensing piece. I was only a part of the conversation about how we are going to scale up or down, but its price, for sure, is competitive."
"Cost-wise, SysTrack has a higher rate than other products, such as Nanoheal, but the features that SysTrack has aren't there in any other product available in the market."
"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Legal Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ControlUp Real-time?
Based on my experience, ControlUp is not that expensive. It is a cheap tool because it is deployed to many devices where I work.
What needs improvement with ControlUp Real-time?
We have approximately 10 to 20 feature requests pending on the vendor side. Most reports give information about the top 100 devices, but not all of the devices. In our case, we are monitoring 20000...
What is your primary use case for ControlUp Real-time?
We use the tool to monitor approximately 2,00,000 devices for a client. We check how the devices are doing in terms of hardware and software. We also check their health and alerts every day. If som...
What do you like most about SysTrack?
I am impressed with the huge amount of information that you can get from the infrastructure.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SysTrack?
It is somewhat expensive. I would rate the pricing a one out of ten, with one being very expensive and ten being very cheap.
What needs improvement with SysTrack?
One thing from a layman's standpoint, the report should be very clear. Another thing is proactively identifying the problem. SysTrack collects telemetry data and identifies potential issues. Howeve...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

B/E Aerospace, North Carolina SECU, Vancouver Island Health Authority, University of Florida
HONDA, TATA, General Mills, Ford, Kellogg's, Air Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about ControlUp vs. SysTrack and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.