Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DarwinBox vs inFeedo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

DarwinBox
Ranking in Talent Management
23rd
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Cloud HCM (16th), HR Analytics Software (8th), Talent Acquisition (11th)
inFeedo
Ranking in Talent Management
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Talent Management category, the mindshare of DarwinBox is 1.8%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of inFeedo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Talent Management
 

Featured Reviews

SHANOOPCHATHOTH PARAMBIL - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing attendance and leave management but needs better performance customization
Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles DarwinBox has provided a significant return on investment for our finance team. Managing payroll and attendance manually would require more team members, so using DarwinBox…
Shailza Khosla - PeerSpot reviewer
A cloud solution for employee management with strong AI to understand employee feeling
When we first implemented inFeedo, the AI engine was not as strong, but with time, they have made it very strong and are rolling out many other features. There are specific parameters and metrics that inFeedo can add to dashboards and scorecards. The platform should be more flexible and meet the needs of all organizations. The improvement of inFeedo depends on the specific requirements of the organization and how the organization is structured. Even for new use cases, inFeedo will not take a lot of time to make changes to the environment quickly and easily.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"The leave-related modules are comprehensive, offering built-in functionalities for optional leaves."
"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"Checking new hires is one of the most impactful features of inFeedo."
 

Cons

"Customization in performance management is cumbersome."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"The platform should be more flexible and meet the needs of all organizations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared with SuccessFactors, there is no major difference in DarwinBox's cost."
"My company makes some yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to DarwinBox."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DarwinBox?
The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping.
What needs improvement with DarwinBox?
Customization in performance management is cumbersome. Processes like six-month appraisals lack easy configurations, and any significant customization requires working with vendors.
What is your primary use case for DarwinBox?
Our primary use case for DarwinBox includes managing attendance, payroll-related tasks, and employee appraisal cycles.
What do you like most about inFeedo?
Checking new hires is one of the most impactful features of inFeedo.
What needs improvement with inFeedo?
When we first implemented inFeedo, the AI engine was not as strong, but with time, they have made it very strong and are rolling out many other features. There are specific parameters and metrics t...
What is your primary use case for inFeedo?
We used the inFeedo to check the pulse of employees at different intervals. We check the pulse after 15 days, another after 45 days, and after 90 days. We ask them questions and check the pulse acc...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Myntra, GVK BIO, Bisleri, Times Internet, Delhivery, Aarti
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.