ElectroNeek vs Pega Robotic Process Automation comparison

ElectroNeek and Pega are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ElectroNeek is ranked #34, while Pega is ranked #22 with an average rating of 6.0. ElectroNeek holds a 1.0% mindshare in RPA, compared to Pega’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of ElectroNeek users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Pega users who would recommend it.

ElectroNeek

Read 9 ElectroNeek reviews

1,387 Views
1,026 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Pega Robotic Process Automa...

Read 25 Pega Robotic Process Automation reviews

2,692 Views
2,450 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ElectroNeek

Pega Robotic Process Automa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Pega Robotic Process Automation and ElectroNeek compete in the robotic process automation market. ElectroNeek appears to have the upper hand due to its cost-effective scaling solutions.

Features: Pega Robotic Process Automation offers comprehensive automation capabilities, robust case management, and powerful integration features. Its development environment allows quick adapter creation and .NET framework integration, making it suitable for complex workflows. ElectroNeek provides cost-efficient solutions with unlimited bot usage without additional licenses, which benefits scalability. Both platforms have low-code/no-code development environments, but Pega's CRM intelligence and advanced debugging differentiate it from ElectroNeek's affordability and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Pega needs to enhance its OCR capabilities, simplify its setup process, and improve regional cloud presence and UI development. Significant training is required for its complex platform and monitoring tools. ElectroNeek should increase compatibility with certain browsers, improve remote desktop interactions, and expand its activity set to match competitors like UiPath for better flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pega offers various deployment options such as public and hybrid clouds, but faces complex initial setups. Its technical support is responsive but can struggle with resolution speed for complex issues. ElectroNeek provides on-premises and private cloud deployment with a simpler setup process. Its customer support is efficient, although technical assistance reliability varies with issue complexity. Community and support teams offer satisfactory deployment guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Pega targets larger enterprises with higher licensing costs and a pay-as-you-go model based on automation processes, predominantly US-centric in pricing. ElectroNeek presents a more affordable alternative with annual billing and memberships, providing a cost-effective solution and good ROI potential for small and medium enterprises, despite hefty initial setup fees for resellers.

To learn more, read our detailed ElectroNeek vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

34th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (21st)

Pega Robotic Process Automa...

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pega Robotic Process Automation is 2.2%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Pega Robotic Process Automation	2.2%
ElectroNeek	1.0%
Other	96.8%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Ishmael Munyai

Automation Software Engineer at apollo studios

With an easy initial setup phase in place, the tool needs to provide functionalities like web scraping to users

It is a very scalable solution. In ElectroNeek, you can build your project in modular programming or with the use of sub-programs. You can have a lot of sub-programs that make up a whole project. If you don't wanna use the drag-and-drop activities, you can use JavaScript or Python instead. So it's very useful when you are working with things such as SPS. Actually, you can write scripts to support all the product functionalities with Python and manage the product's functions. You will find a company named Apollo Studios on the website of ElectroNeek. I think they are one of the best companies in South Africa that entered into a partnership with ElectroNeek.

Read full review

reviewer1458102

Regional Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Has raised concerns due to outdated framework and high ownership costs

Pega Robotic Process Automation is a temporary solution to a bigger issue, and the cost of implementation especially with Pega really stops customers from proceeding. The total cost of ownership could be improved. From a technical perspective, the product performs adequately. The installation can be quite complex as it's not standalone, and customers need to get the whole Pega platform up and running. The total cost of ownership is not very attractive. RPA as a concept is outdated now, with agentic AI becoming more prominent. We don't see much interest from customers in going down the RPA route; Pega Robotic Process Automation is losing its prominence in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."

"The most valuable feature is the price."

"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."

"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."

"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."

"I would advise others to go for it and just implement it; it is a really good solution."

"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

More ElectroNeek pros

"User-friendly, easy to understand and has many features including the ability to track."

"The solution's ability to create adapters quickly is its most valuable feature."

"Its stability has been good."

"The workflow system is very intuitive."

"With Pega Robotics, once we integrated it will work with any machines after deployment until there is a change."

"It is a good and matured solution."

"The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience."

"We have centralized the monitoring, and in Pega Robot Manager we currently have multiple dashboards where we can track, schedule, and handle everything, which has been a game changer in the last one-and-a-half years and has met what the business expected."

More Pega Robotic Process Automation pros

Cons

"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."

"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."

"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."

"Its price could definitely be lower."

"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."

"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."

More ElectroNeek cons

"Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low."

"What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation can improve the OGR area. You don't have a feature to read documents in computer voices."

"Rule versioning and deployment to enable parallel development could still be improved"

"Pega's main drawback was that you have to go and install their platform and their platform is meant to be their main selling point with robotics just a small part of what they do."

"You cannot use a two-dimensional array to read the data."

"In Pega, the UI has to be improved because that is the most challenging area that most of our customers ask for because we have to depend on some other React JS or some other tool to bring that kind of UI experience. So, there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of UI and UX."

"I have faced many scenarios in the business workflow, where a few applications run on the Citrix environment. That could be a critical part of the process without which business won't be able to accept the automation solution. Because of one small bottleneck, you will lose a very good candidate for process automation."

More Pega Robotic Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I give the price an eight out of ten."

"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."

"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."

"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."

"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Pega is as competitive as the basic players such as UiPath or Automation Anywhere. UiPath is the most expensive, but Pega is at par with Automation Anywhere."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation is an expensive solution."

"I was not involved in licensing and pricing, but it is worth the cost."

"Pega is pretty costly."

"In terms of Pega Robotic Process Automation pricing, I would rate it a five out of five because the solution has a good price. Pricing is not very high, though I'm unsure of the exact cost, based on my experience, the price for Pega Robotic Process Automation is less than Blue Prism because I worked with a few clients that have both solutions and my clients prefer Pega Robotic Process Automation over Blue Prism particularly because of the licensing costs."

"The licensing cost is too high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yea there are. For example Electroneek.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pega Robotic Process Automation?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pega Robotic Process Automation?

For banking customers, Pega Robotic Process Automation can fill in the process automation which cannot usually be done by process reengineering; we use it for activities such as process mining to i...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Pega Robotic Process Automation?

I am George from a system integrator and reseller background. We are a system integrator, reseller, and implementer of SAP, Camunda, and others. RPA hasn't been around for more than five to six yea...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs ElectroNeek

Compared 12% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs ElectroNeek

Compared 7% of the time

Perpetuuiti Platform vs ElectroNeek

Compared 7% of the time

Robocorp vs ElectroNeek

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs ElectroNeek

Compared 6% of the time

More ElectroNeek Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 20% of the time

Blue Prism vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

IPsoft 1RPA vs Pega Robotic Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

More Pega Robotic Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

April 2026

Download ElectroNeek product report

Buyer's Guide

Pega Robotic Process Automation

April 2026

Download Pega Robotic Process Automation product report

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA

Pega RPA, OpenSpan

Overview

ElectroNeek is an Intelligent Automation Platform transforming business process management in enterprises by integrating AI bots with employee workflows, automating routines, and helping humans to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. ElectroNeek provides a wide range of exciting low-code automation tools based on RPA, IDP, AI and GPT-4 (Conversational and Generative) technologies.

ElectroNeek

With Pega Robotic Process Automation (RPA), organizations can automate the mundane, tedious, time-consuming, manual work that is hampering productivity and efficiency. Whether adjudicating claims, onboarding customers or employees, reconciling financials, updating customer information in systems record, Pega RPA can manage the work across your enterprise.

Pega

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower

eBay Enterprise, M&I Bank

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation

April 2026

Free Report: ElectroNeek vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ElectroNeek vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.