GitLab vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

GitLab and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while PortSwigger is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. GitLab holds a 2.9% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 84 GitLab reviews

3,506 Views
2,947 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,091 Views
2,091 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitLab

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and GitLab are distinguished tools competing in the application security and DevOps platform category, respectively. GitLab seems to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive approach, providing a more extensive solution to DevOps needs while still offering significant security features.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional includes robust security testing tools, supports automated security test capabilities, and enables precise vulnerability identification. GitLab provides CI/CD integration, version control, and project management capabilities, making it suitable for various DevOps processes.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could enhance reporting capabilities, improve export format options, and refine user interface design. GitLab could benefit from more intuitive administrative controls, increased performance speed for large projects, and streamlined process optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers straightforward deployment, suited to those needing seamless integration. GitLab's multifaceted setup can challenge users initially, but its customer service support is appreciated after acclimation.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users are satisfied with cost-effectiveness in security testing. GitLab, while having higher initial setup costs, is valued for strong ROI through its extensive tool suite, proving worthwhile for larger teams seeking a unified platform.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of GitLab are the CI/CD pipeline and code management."

"Continuous integration with deployment is very powerful, which is a significant reason for migrating from TFS to GitLab."

"In our software development lifecycle, GitLab is used as a component for code repository management. We use GitLab for several projects to handle code repositories. For other software projects, we use Bitbucket, but the use case for both is very similar."

"CI/CD is very good. The version control system is also good. These are the two features that we use."

"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."

"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."

"It scales well."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is compatible with GitHub. The product's integration capabilities are sufficient for our small company of 35 people."

More GitLab pros

"The feature that we have found most valuable is that it comes with pre-set configurations. They have a set of predefined options where you can pick one and start scanning. We also have the option of creating our own configurations, like how often do the applications need to be scanned."

"It was easy to learn."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional has an intercept tab that helps us to scan our APIs, set the response, and request errors."

"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the Burp Intruder tool."

"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the advanced features, user-friendly interface, and integration with other tools."

"The active scanner, which does an automated search of any web vulnerabilities."

"The tool provides complimentary services. It allows you to add a lot of extensions, and you can get extensions quite often. It is quite a flexible application."

"The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"The pricing model of GitLab is an issue for me."

"The tool should include a feature that helps to edit the code directly."

"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"It should be used by a larger number of people. They should raise awareness."

"GitLab should enhance its GitOps capability as they are currently using FluxCD, however, Argo CD is better and offers more features. GitLab should work on improving their user interface for GitOps as it is lagging behind."

"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."

"In the next release, I would like to see GitLab expand its integration capabilities to include platforms like DigitalOcean, which developers widely use for cloud infrastructure. Enhancing CI/CD automation features specifically tailored for DigitalOcean would be beneficial."

More GitLab cons

"You can have many false positives in Burp Suite. It depends on the scale of the penetration testing."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"Scanning APIs using PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional takes a lot of time."

"I would like to see a more optimized solution, as it currently uses a lot of CPU power and memory."

"BurpSuite has some issues regarding authentication with OAT tokens that need to be improved."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."

"The use of system memory is an area that can be improved because it uses a lot."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not aware of the licensing costs because those were covered by the customer."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"GitLab is cheap."

"I'm not sure if they have some kind of discount. I've been negotiating with them on prices before, and I believe they weren't too happy to give discounts, but list prices are $19 per user, per month for Premium and $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. So, the difference between Premium and Ultimate is a bit bigger, and in most companies, you need to build some type of business case."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."

"This solution requires a license. It is expensive but you receive a lot of functionality for the price."

"Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."

"There are multiple versions available of PortSwigger Burp Suite, such as enterprise, commercial, professional, and beginners."

"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."

"There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."

"For a country such as Sri Lanka, the pricing is not reasonable."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

22%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 19% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

April 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Burp

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors, best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, and best Fuzz Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.