GitLab vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

GitLab and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. GitLab holds a 3.0% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 81 GitLab reviews

3,981 Views
3,274 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 62 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,592 Views
2,373 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitLab

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and GitLab are distinguished tools competing in the application security and DevOps platform category, respectively. GitLab seems to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive approach, providing a more extensive solution to DevOps needs while still offering significant security features.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional includes robust security testing tools, supports automated security test capabilities, and enables precise vulnerability identification. GitLab provides CI/CD integration, version control, and project management capabilities, making it suitable for various DevOps processes.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could enhance reporting capabilities, improve export format options, and refine user interface design. GitLab could benefit from more intuitive administrative controls, increased performance speed for large projects, and streamlined process optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers straightforward deployment, suited to those needing seamless integration. GitLab's multifaceted setup can challenge users initially, but its customer service support is appreciated after acclimation.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users are satisfied with cost-effectiveness in security testing. GitLab, while having higher initial setup costs, is valued for strong ROI through its extensive tool suite, proving worthwhile for larger teams seeking a unified platform.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

9th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature."

"I like GitLab's security and SAS tools."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

"The solution makes the CI/CD pipelines easy to execute."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features."

"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."

"We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."

More GitLab pros

"It was easy to learn."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."

"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."

"It is a time-saver application."

"The intercepting feature is the most valuable."

"It helps in API testing, where manual intervention was previously necessary for each payload."

"The solution has a great user interface."

"I rate PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional ten points out of ten."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"As a partner, sometimes it's difficult to get support. They have a really complicated procedure for their support."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities."

"The integration could be slightly better."

"I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."

More GitLab cons

"The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."

"The Burp Collaborator needs improvement. There also needs to be improved integration."

"One thing that is not up to the mark in PortSwigger is web application testing. I found some issues with its performance and reporting. They should work on these and give us a better outcome."

"The tool is very expensive."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional can improve by having more features in the free version for beginners to try."

"We wish that the Spider feature would appear in the same shape that it does in previous versions."

"There could be an improvement in the API security testing. There is another tool called Postman and if we had a built-in portal similar to Postman which captures the API, we would be able to generate the API traffic. Right now we need a Postman tool and the Burp Suite for performing API tests. It would be a huge benefit to be able to do it in a single UI."

"You can have many false positives in Burp Suite. It depends on the scale of the penetration testing."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"The solution is free."

"GitLab is cheap."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective and is best suited for small and medium-sized businesses."

"There are multiple versions available of PortSwigger Burp Suite, such as enterprise, commercial, professional, and beginners."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."

"Pricing is not very high. It was around $200."

"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."

"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."

"Burp Suite is affordable."

"This solution requires a license. It is expensive but you receive a lot of functionality for the price."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing w...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The pricing for Burp Suite Professional is not very high, however, it could be more flexible for clients.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 37% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 18% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 9% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

January 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

January 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Burp

Learn More

GitLab

PortSwigger

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

January 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors, best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, and best Fuzz Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.