GitLab vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

GitLab and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while PortSwigger is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.8. GitLab holds a 3.0% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 82 GitLab reviews

3,789 Views
3,120 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,307 Views
2,240 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitLab

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and GitLab are distinguished tools competing in the application security and DevOps platform category, respectively. GitLab seems to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive approach, providing a more extensive solution to DevOps needs while still offering significant security features.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional includes robust security testing tools, supports automated security test capabilities, and enables precise vulnerability identification. GitLab provides CI/CD integration, version control, and project management capabilities, making it suitable for various DevOps processes.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could enhance reporting capabilities, improve export format options, and refine user interface design. GitLab could benefit from more intuitive administrative controls, increased performance speed for large projects, and streamlined process optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers straightforward deployment, suited to those needing seamless integration. GitLab's multifaceted setup can challenge users initially, but its customer service support is appreciated after acclimation.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users are satisfied with cost-effectiveness in security testing. GitLab, while having higher initial setup costs, is valued for strong ROI through its extensive tool suite, proving worthwhile for larger teams seeking a unified platform.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Ranking in Fuzz Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I recommend GitLab for DevOps engineers."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"CI/CD is very good. The version control system is also good. These are the two features that we use."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

"The solution is stable."

"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."

"We use GitLab in the new project for CI/CD, integration, and deployment."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

More GitLab pros

"This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives."

"The active scanner, which does an automated search of any web vulnerabilities."

"We are mostly using it for scanning the entire website. So, we basically create a script with the entire website and then run it for different injections."

"The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues."

"This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps."

"The solution has a limited range of functions, which is good for small companies. This is because, in small companies, websites are less complex. They also have single services which makes the solution good enough for them. However, the most advantageous aspect of the solution is its affordable price."

"I find the attack model quite amazing, where I can write my scripts and load my scripts as well, which helps quite a bit. All the active scanning that it can do is also quite a lot helpful. It speeds up our vulnerability assessment and penetration testing. Right now, I am enjoying its in-browser, which also helps quite a bit. I'm always confused about setting up some proxy, but it really is the big solution we all want."

"The most valuable features are Burp Intruder and Burp Scanner."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."

"While GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features. Roadmaps and Gantt charts in GitLab are not as advanced as in Jira, and changing start and end dates is more laborious in GitLab."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."

"There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files."

"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"GitLab should enhance its GitOps capability as they are currently using FluxCD, however, Argo CD is better and offers more features. GitLab should work on improving their user interface for GitOps as it is lagging behind."

More GitLab cons

"The solution is not easy to set it up. You need a lot of knowledge."

"Scanning needs to be improved in enterprise and professional versions."

"There is not much automation in the tool."

"We wish that the Spider feature would appear in the same shape that it does in previous versions."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."

"I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions."

"It would be good if the solution could give us more details about what exactly is defective."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool."

"There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."

"Pricing is not very high. It was around $200."

"This is a value for money product."

"There are multiple versions available of PortSwigger Burp Suite, such as enterprise, commercial, professional, and beginners."

"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."

"The yearly cost is about $300."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The pricing for Burp Suite Professional is not very high, however, it could be more flexible for clients.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 31% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 20% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 7% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

March 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Burp

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

February 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors, best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, and best Fuzz Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.