Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HCL Verse vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

HCL Verse
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Email Applications (13th)
Microsoft Teams
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
163
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th), Enterprise Social Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. HCL Verse is designed for Email Applications and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, down 1.5% compared to last year.
Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, focuses on Virtual Meetings, holds 2.6% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Email Applications
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

it_user660054 - PeerSpot reviewer
HTML mail with MIME pictures are displayed correctly. Draft synchronization is enabled.
HTML mail with MIME pictures are displayed correctly. Draft synchronization is enabled. Previously, users were not able to synchronize draft emails created and saved in Lotus Notes to the mobile device and in the opposite direction. This simply was not supported. After we switched to the Verse app, users appreciated this synchronization function. They can use already saved drafts from Lotus Notes and later process the email operation from a mobile device.
Santhosh Varghese - PeerSpot reviewer
Whiteboard and content sharing features are good
I would rate Teams's stability as a nine out of ten. However, some recent updates have made it less stable. I find it a little bit choppy. Sometimes, I find the network quality is not very good with low bandwidth. So, sometimes, when you have low bandwidth the quality becomes very poor. So, you have to optimize your usage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the mail server."
"HCL Verse has a nice interface and it is a practical email solution. There are a diverse set of features, such as the search bar on top of the screens."
"In general, Teams allows me to connect with anyone in the organization and share files with the team."
"The installation is very, very easy."
"I like the whiteboard feature as well. I'm able to scribble some stuff if I need to explain a couple of items."
"Using the solution's screen-sharing feature, we can go through a document together and take control."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that I can attach files in any format."
"The solution has calendars that help us to manage work."
"You can ping, chat, and call someone, and at the same time, on the next tab, you can see all the documents related to what someone is referring to."
"It is an excellent all-around communications tool that works well for business purposes."
 

Cons

"The solution could improve by allowing us to use a color that we want in the editing boxes."
"Security is very important to us, so improvements to this functionality are welcome."
"The product's performance has certain shortcomings that require improvement."
"The solution needs to be integrated with Microsoft Planner. I have also faced issues with stability in the first month."
"Microsoft Teams could log in faster."
"The application's user interface on Google has shortcomings that need to be improved."
"Its stability could be better."
"There needs to be a robust change management platform that offers training to keep the user community aware of upcoming updates and features."
"The solution's customer support should be faster and more responsive."
"At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"This is an affordable solution but the price could be improved."
"It is expensive."
"The tool is cheaper than Google Meet. I rate it a three out of four."
"It is moderately expensive than other Microsoft products."
"We have a license for the solution."
"You don't buy only the Teams license; you buy it as part of the Microsoft 365 bundle."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"I rate the pricing as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The tool's price is part of MS Office 365 and I would rate its pricing five out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are monthly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
Educational Organization
71%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party comp...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
Everything is running smoothly, and I’m still exploring more features. As for improvements, I think it could be more user-friendly and integrate better with third-party software, like Zoom and othe...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Verse, IBM Verse
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Canon Marketing Japan Inc., Australian Trade Commission, BTC, Havas, Canal Barge Co.Inc., RAVInvest, Elemental Path, WDR mediagroup
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Email Applications. Updated: December 2024.
825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.