OpenText UFT One vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

OpenText and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while SmartBear is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. OpenText holds a 10.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to SmartBear’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT One

Read 95 OpenText UFT One reviews

7,841 Views
4,923 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 75 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

4,385 Views
3,228 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

SmartBear TestComplete

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and SmartBear TestComplete are competitive products in the test automation market. OpenText UFT One appears to have a technical edge due to its feature-rich support for various technologies and robust integration capabilities, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is favored for its cost-effectiveness and easier entry for smaller-scale automation needs.

Features: OpenText UFT One is strong in diverse browser support, robust integration with Excel and ALM, and includes InsightObject methods and testing extensibility. SmartBear TestComplete provides ease of use with direct access to object properties, and comprehensive web, desktop, and mobile testing capabilities, although it may struggle with dynamic object recognition and performance in complex environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One could enhance stability, reduce memory usage, and improve browser compatibility and integration with open-source tools while offering more competitive pricing. SmartBear TestComplete would benefit from improving intuitive object mapping, enhancing support for modern web frameworks, and expanding features for mobile testing. Both tools need UI and integration enhancements to alleviate user challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One allows deployment in on-premises and private cloud environments, while SmartBear TestComplete's on-premises deployment suits users desiring straightforward licensing. OpenText UFT One's customer service can be excellent but variable due to reliance on external support. SmartBear TestComplete, meanwhile, enjoys solid partner support and rapid responses to enhance user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is regarded as expensive with a complex licensing model, yet provides substantial ROI for large enterprises needing extensive automation. SmartBear TestComplete, being more economical, attracts organizations looking for cost-effective solutions through its flexible licensing. While OpenText UFT One requires a higher initial investment, its advanced features promise significant returns, as TestComplete offers savings and value through efficient usage and flexible licensing.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (5th)

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.2%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 6.0%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."

"With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files."

"It is very simple to use, and the scripting language is even easier."

"The solution's recording option is the most beneficial for test script creation and maintenance."

"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."

"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."

"I find UFT One to be very good for thick clients, which are non-browser applications."

More OpenText UFT One pros

"TestComplete is simple, it's a very easy-to-use tool."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to integrate with Azure DevOps for continuous integration and deployment."

"Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well."

"You can record your actions and play them back later."

"In TestComplete, I saw a conformed package of a tool that kept everybody in consistency. The team was able to regenerate further tests without having to manipulate more code because the record feature is great."

"The solution has a very nice interface."

"It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems."

"The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them. The are other features that SmartBear TestComplete has but the competition widely has them as well."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

Cons

"It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this."

"One area for improvement is its occasional slowness."

"One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement."

"One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all."

"The tool needs to improve its performance since it can become heavy."

"Technical support could be improved."

"The speed could be improved because a large test suite takes some time to execute."

"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."

More OpenText UFT One cons

"The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex."

"The recording function, when using Python, could be improved, as it does not work well in recording testing."

"The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools."

"SmartBear products generally have a weak link when it comes to integration with other test management tools like Inflectra."

"The way objects are added and used when utilizing descriptive programming could be improved. It is a little unwieldy, compared to UFT."

"Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work."

"We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses."

"The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"The price is reasonable."

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."

"My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it."

"Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."

"The solution is around $1500. Some are perpetual licenses, and some get a yearly report card."

"The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."

"The solution's pricing is too high."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I don't know much about the pricing, however, I think it's cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

The recording function, when using Python, could be improved, as it does not work well in recording testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 32% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 23% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

Qt Squish vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

Eggplant Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 6% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

February 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

February 2025

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

What is SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.

TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.

TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:

Desktop: Users can easily and quickly automate UI tests using today’s most popular desktop applications, such as; Windows, Java, Python,.Net, VBScript, and more.
Web: Users can effortlessly create renewable tests for all of today’s popular web applications, including JavaScript frameworks on 2000+ trusted browser and platform integrations.
Mobile: Users can safely build and automate serviceable UI tests on actual or virtual android or IOS devices, locally or in the cloud. Users can create code or codeless tests. TestComplete seamlessly integrates with many of today’s popular frameworks.

Key Features

Easily create automated UI tests: TestComplete offers scriptless Record and Replay or simple keyword-driven tests to quickly develop any type of UI test users may require. Tests can be recorded once, then replayed when needed across various applications on mobile, web, or desktop environments. TestComplete integrates with many different languages, such as Java, Python, C+, and more.
Keyword driven tests: Users can easily divide testing steps, actions, objects, and data with an integrated keyword-driven test structure. This makes it easy for every user to participate in the test automation process; there is no programming experience needed. Everything is made simple with easy-to-use point-and-click options.
Data driven tests: Easily distinguish data from test commands to keep administrative efforts simple. Users can improve overall coverage by running various automated mobile, desktop, or web UI tests.
Record and Replay: Users can reuse created automated tests across every environment as often as desired. This helps to expand overall test coverage and represents a huge cost and time savings.

Reviews from Real Users

Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”

Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete

March 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.