Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM ECM vs OpenText Extended ECM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
IBM ECM support receives praise for technical aid but faces criticism for delays, inconsistent quality, and bureaucratic challenges.
No sentiment score available
OpenText Extended ECM support is knowledgeable but inconsistent, with delays in assigning experts unless escalated through vendors.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
2.8
IBM ECM needs Java reliance reduction, better integration, simplified interfaces, improved usability, analytics, and flexible licensing enhancements.
Sentiment score
4.9
OpenText Extended ECM needs improvements in UI, stability, integration, analytics, workflows, documentation, performance, records management, and architecture.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
IBM ECM is praised for its seamless scalability, supporting global operations and accommodating both small and large enterprises efficiently.
Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText Extended ECM is praised for its impressive scalability, supporting diverse organizational needs with both on-premise and cloud capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM ECM offers reasonable three-year pricing but requires clarity on requirements to avoid future cost adjustments; local partners can help.
No sentiment score available
Enterprise users find OpenText Extended ECM expensive and complex but valuable for consolidating data management solutions despite costs.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
IBM ECM is praised for its stability and reliability, despite challenges with custom integrations and legacy components.
Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText Extended ECM is stable and reliable, scoring highly, but performance may vary with usage and load.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
IBM ECM excels in document governance, automation, scalability, workflow capabilities, and secure content management, enhancing business processes effectively.
Sentiment score
8.3
OpenText Extended ECM integrates with SAP, offering strong security, metadata management, customizable workflows, and seamless content connection across applications.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM ECM
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Extended ECM
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Content Collaboration Platforms (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM ECM is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Extended ECM is 11.4%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Omar_Ismail - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution for automation with high availability
Moving to the cloud with IBM ECM is not allowed. In Saudi Arabia, the cloud infrastructure is still non-operational, potentially for the next two to three months. Static clouds are prevalent among foundational enterprises such as IBM and Oracle. IBM offers its cloud insights, maintaining its cloud ecosystem. IBM's efforts to enhance the user experience within its ECM platform are lacking compared to competitors like OpenText. Progress in implementing new technologies and features seems sluggish. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Bala Raju - PeerSpot reviewer
Permissions management is really good and offer classification categories for searching data
There are some workflows which need to be more user-friendly. We need to improve here on the specific map of the developers. Also, the support from OpenText is really difficult. Honestly, I had a very bad experience on this. It's really difficult to reach out to OpenText. Even for small things, OpenText is not transparent. As a professional, I don't think that's the right way. This is also one of the disadvantages; many customers are moving out of OpenText. I saw multiple instances when I was working with new RFPs or new opportunities. So many customers are raising the same concern, and they are looking for alternate products. That's been the case many times at the project level. With OpenText, we ourselves often have to resolve the issue before OpenText people provide a solution.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Government
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM ECM?
The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Mic...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM ECM?
The product is expensive and has a perpetual license.
What needs improvement with IBM ECM?
The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days.
What do you like most about OpenText Content Suite Platform?
We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into wher...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Content Suite Platform?
OpenText itself is a too expensive tool. But why the reason customers opt for is OpenText is one of the best and provides very good complex data with their managers.
What needs improvement with OpenText Content Suite Platform?
There are some workflows which need to be more user-friendly. We need to improve here on the specific map of the developers. Also, the support from OpenText is really difficult. Honestly, I had a v...
 

Also Known As

No data available
OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Core Share
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group
ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM ECM vs. OpenText Extended ECM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.