Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Kenexa vs UKG comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
IBM Kenexa's customer service is criticized for delays, while technical support receives mixed reviews, generally rated 7/10.
No sentiment score available
UKG's customer service quality varies; technical support is generally effective but sometimes inconsistent, with excellent or delayed experiences.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.6
IBM Kenexa users seek modernization with improved configuration, faster support, enhanced reporting, and better analytics for recruiting processes.
Sentiment score
4.2
UKG needs improved support, clearer processes, seamless integration, and updated features for better usability and system stability.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
IBM Kenexa is scalable, integrates smoothly, and efficiently manages global recruitment needs, making it ideal for large corporations.
Sentiment score
8.2
UKG is rated highly for scalability, user-friendliness, and flexibility, supporting medium to large companies effectively.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM Kenexa offers cost-effective pricing starting at £35,000 annually, with additional setup and customization costs for long-term value.
No sentiment score available
UKG's pricing offers mid-range costs with volume discounts, emphasizing module understanding and negotiation for optimal ROI.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
IBM Kenexa offers dependable performance with minimal downtime, prompt issue resolution, and efficient integration through strong project management support.
Sentiment score
6.9
UKG is stable with quick issue resolution, despite occasional payroll interruptions, report errors, and time clock hardware problems.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
IBM Kenexa offers highly configurable recruitment solutions with strong automation, compliance, analytics, and user-friendly interface for international postings.
Sentiment score
7.7
UKG provides payroll processing, self-service features, recruitment tools, and data integration to enhance efficiency and employee retention.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Kenexa
Ranking in Benefits Administration
17th
Ranking in Talent Management
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software (17th)
UKG
Ranking in Benefits Administration
5th
Ranking in Talent Management
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
124
Ranking in other categories
Employee Scheduling Software (1st), Cloud HCM (5th), Employee Time Tracking Software (3rd), HR Analytics Software (1st), Talent Acquisition (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Benefits Administration category, the mindshare of IBM Kenexa is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UKG is 7.2%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Benefits Administration
 

Featured Reviews

Karan Grover - PeerSpot reviewer
Suitable for larger-scale companies aiming to streamline and automate their processes digitally
The deployment of the solution took between six to eight months. When we introduced BrassRing at my company, we encountered several challenges. First, moving data from our old system to BrassRing was tough because it needed reformatting. Second, connecting BrassRing with our HR data was tricky due to manual processes for roles and departments. Third, setting up the workflow in BrassRing was complex. Fourth, configuring user access and approval levels was a detailed task. We also had to manage the change process, including running both old and new systems in parallel, communicating changes, and training users. Lastly, monitoring and reporting were needed to ensure data accuracy and proper system usage once everything was in place. We had a team of six to eight people managing the project from our side during the BrassRing deployment. I'm not sure about the size of the BrassRing team, and we also had our own technical team, which had three to four members. The solution required maintenance, particularly from my side as the administrator. Maintenance responsibilities were divided into two parts: some tasks we, as end-users, could control, while others were the responsibility of the BrassRing team. Payment-related tasks were a regular part of our responsibilities. I wasn't the only person maintaining the solution. There were three power users from Infosys, each responsible for a specific geography. My counterpart managed it in the US, and I, along with my colleague in India, managed it for other geographies.
Lonnie Fluck - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us establish system front-end and back-end connectivity, but the recruiting features need improvement
I used UKG to track applicants and create job descriptions. We built the electronic onboarding system to be used nationwide and created a path to integrate with the backend The product's most valuable feature is the ability to establish connectivity between the front and the back end,…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Benefits Administration solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
88%
Computer Software Company
1%
Healthcare Company
1%
Financial Services Firm
1%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Kenexa?
The ease of scaling is one of BrassRing's biggest strengths, making it a trusted choice for large companies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Kenexa?
As a large company, we first bought the complete BrassRing package, which had various features. Later on, we paid extra for specific features like customer test management. When we integrated with ...
What needs improvement with IBM Kenexa?
BrassRing needs improvement in a few areas. First, it should update how it tracks where candidates come from and avoid duplicate entries. Right now, it is not very flexible. Also, its way of making...
What needs improvement with UKG?
Our company is testing the UKG Ready Mobile App, but there are some glitches. I feel that in the system when you log on to Kronos, UKG Dimensions, and UKG Workforce Central, we have different modul...
What is your primary use case for UKG?
I worked with UKG globally, assisting with its implementation in 59 countries. In my company, we use it for the timekeeping aspect offered, payroll purposes, and other stuff like that. It is used f...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

IBM Smarter Workforce, Outstart
UKG Pro, UKG Dimensons, UKG Ready
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sweet Spot International (SSI), Leo Burnett Worldwide (LBW), Sika AG, Legacy Health, Apollo Group Inc., Regeneron, Transurban Group, National Health Service, New Zealand Police, Overland Footwear, Yealands, Johnson Controls, Allscripts, Kerry Foods, Masterpet, AMD, Balfour Beatty
Tesla, Marriott, Yamaha, Aramark, Feeding America, Samsung, Sony Music, Dave & Buster's, Revlon
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Kenexa vs. UKG and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.