ITRS Geneos vs ServiceNow Cloud Observability comparison

ITRS and ServiceNow are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.8, while ServiceNow is ranked #47 with an average rating of 7.5. ITRS holds a 1.4% mindshare in APM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,017 Views
2,224 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Read 4 ServiceNow Cloud Observability reviews

901 Views
743 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ITRS Geneos and ServiceNow Cloud Observability are two leading solutions in infrastructure monitoring and cloud observability. Based on the comparison, ServiceNow Cloud Observability seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced capabilities in cloud-native integrations and automation.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers detailed insights into on-premises infrastructure, robust monitoring features, and comprehensive data analysis. ServiceNow Cloud Observability provides advanced analytics, automation, and the ability to consolidate data across cloud services, making it highly effective for cloud monitoring.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos could benefit from better cloud monitoring, enhanced reporting capabilities, and a more intuitive interface. ServiceNow Cloud Observability users seek deeper customization options, improved response times for technical support, and refinement of its alerting system to reduce false positives.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos has a straightforward deployment process but requires significant planning for optimal integration. Customer service is generally positive, though response times could be faster. ServiceNow Cloud Observability is praised for its ease of deployment in cloud environments and has a responsive and helpful customer service team.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is noted for its high pricing, but the extensive on-premises features and strong ROI justify the cost. ServiceNow Cloud Observability, while having a considerable initial setup cost, offers substantial ROI through its comprehensive cloud features and automation capabilities, making the investment worthwhile.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,528 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (26th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (21st)

ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

47th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Cloud Observability is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Durai CT

Head FM Monitoring at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Dec 14, 2022

A stable, scalable, and flexible monitoring tool

Real-time data is one of the unique features that ITRS Geneos offers. For example, if there is an impact on a particular server and a particular application, I want to see what the impact is or what the CPU or hardware usage information is, as well as the service in the same application. I can see the real-time data and the impact by accessing ITRS Geneos and looking at the tree. I don't want a tool that tells me when something is broken. I want the tool to tell me when something is going to break. That is the difference between ITRS Geneos and other tools. I want proactive monitoring, not reactive. I don't need to be notified after the fact that something has broken. If something is broken, I get a notification by email, and some of my customers are going to call me. ITRS Geneos provides proactive monitoring. The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring. ITRS Geneos not only alerts us but also gives us a real-time view of the data. This is the tool's first great advantage. It is also lightweight and flexible and can adapt to monitor even low-latency systems, which is the tool's second advantage. Another great feature of this tool is its good presentation layer, which allows us to build custom dashboards to present to business stakeholders. This gives them a high-level status of what is being monitored. If we compare ITRS Geneos to other tools, we will find that each one specializes in a specific area, but the ITRS Geneos tool is more comprehensive. This is its great advantage.

Read full review

Prashant-Sharma

Senior Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Aug 30, 2023

Provides effective observability and offers robust alerting and monitoring capabilities

We use some SDK to integrate like tips in our code, in our Java code or whatever code, rightly, Skylight or whatever. So, the SDK that we use is not very easy to get a hold of. So, a person who is more experienced is able to write proper code so that an operation can have an operation name to set. So, SDK would be improved for developers so that the integration and code will get easier. The support team could be better. Because of the different versions of different tactics of integrating reactive code base, the documentation is not very clear if someone has to be onboard. I would rate the documentation of Lightstep a five out of ten. It could need improvement. Currently, what happens is, suppose in a stream, we have lots of spans. So if there is something I can filter, for example, in a single trace, there are ten calls with it. And if I have to filter, I have to go inside the individual trace to get the call. In future releases, I want to see if it is possible to filter them at a very high stream level. So, for example, I want to filter the calls only from service A, ten calls, and I want to filter only two calls out of ten. So, instead of doing that filter at the trace level, can I do it at a stream level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."

"The Netprobe is so lightweight compared to the agents that most monitoring tools use. It's really superior to the competition. The agent that is used by almost every competitive tool takes a lot more system resources. It's slower and it requires a greater effort and more compromises in terms of security to install on the monitored servers. With Geneos, because it lives outside the code, it is far easier and far less taxing on the monitored systems."

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"The UI is very intuitive."

"The ability to create a stream based on different parameters, operation name, service name, URL, tags, and URI part, is one valuable feature."

"To a certain extent, it is possible to save on the costs of the product."

"The solution Lightstep/ServiceNow has a couple of pretty advanced functionalities to help us investigate a deviation and help the development teams have better observability in the environment using distributed and complex services."

Cons

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages."

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."

"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app. This is something that probably everyone asks when they see the tool and they see how powerful it is. If there is any mobile app for this or if there is any way this tool can be more easily accessible other than having a big client installed, it would be great. I know you can build dashboards, et cetera, but there is no quick and easy way. I should be able to download an app, log in, and see my status. That will put this product above everything else out there. I believe it's on their roadmap."

"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"The design of this solution is not very intuitive and probably could come with more friendly tips for beginners."

"The support team could be better. Because of the different versions of different tactics of integrating reactive code base, the documentation is not very clear if someone has to be onboard. I would rate the documentation of Lightstep a five out of ten. It could need improvement."

"In terms of licensing, users would want the product to offer them the ability to tailor the tasks offered in the solution to suit their needs."

"The dashboard and graphics must be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive. I rate the tool's pricing model an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

77%

Computer Software Company

University

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What do you like most about LightStep?

The UI is very intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LightStep?

There are a lot of workflows and connectors. In terms of licensing, users would want the product to offer them the ability to tailor the tasks offered in the solution to suit their needs.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LightStep?

I use the solution in my company since it has multiple tenants available. Basically, what happens in business is that you have a hybrid setup model, and for that, you extensively use a cloud platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 12% of the time

Prometheus vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Grafana vs ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Compared 33% of the time

New Relic vs ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Compared 29% of the time

Helios vs ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Compared 9% of the time

More ServiceNow Cloud Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

October 2024

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

ServiceNow Cloud Observability

October 2024

Download ServiceNow Cloud Observability product report

Also Known As

Geneos

LightStep

Learn More

ITRS

Video not available

ServiceNow

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ServiceNow Cloud Observability is a comprehensive platform designed to enhance visibility, control, and performance monitoring of your IT infrastructure and applications. It seamlessly integrates log management, trace management, metrics monitoring, and infrastructure monitoring in real-time, leveraging AI and machine learning for automated tasks and actionable insights. With benefits including improved visibility, faster incident resolution, enhanced application performance, simplified IT operations, and reduced costs, this cloud-native solution is ideal for businesses of all sizes with complex IT infrastructures. It integrates seamlessly with ServiceNow IT Operations Management (ITOM), supports OpenTelemetry standards, and provides AI-powered insights along with pre-built dashboards and reports.

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

InVision, Twilio, Lyft, Yext, DigitalOcean,

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability

October 2024

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.