No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

JetPatch vs NinjaOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JetPatch
Ranking in Patch Management
36th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NinjaOne
Ranking in Patch Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (8th), Network Monitoring Software (11th), Server Monitoring (3rd), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Remote Access (8th), Vulnerability Management (19th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (3rd), IT Alerting and Incident Management (6th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), MSP Backup (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of JetPatch is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 7.6%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NinjaOne7.6%
JetPatch0.8%
Other91.6%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use JetPatch?
Leave a review
Not Joseph Pearson - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials
Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support
NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I think it is very reasonable for the product that we get.
What needs improvement with NinjaOne?
To improve NinjaOne, there should be better integration between multiple different software including Cisco and Meraki.
What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?
My main use case for NinjaOne is managing machines over multiple networks and locations. For managing machines across those networks or locations, we have NinjaOne deployed on all our machines, and...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Dell 4. Google 5. IBM 6. Intel 7. Microsoft 8. Oracle 9. SAP 10. VMware 11. Adobe 12. Autodesk 13. CA Technologies 14. Check Point 15. Citrix 16. EMC 17. Ericsson 18. F Networks 19. Gartner 20. HP 21. IBM 22. Juniper Networks 23. McAfee 24. NetApp 25. SAP 26. Siemens 27. Symantec 28. Trend Micro 29. Verizon 30. Western Digital
Status Pros, Mitchell and Company
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.