Kaseya Traverse vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Kaseya and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Kaseya is ranked #69 with an average rating of 6.3, while ManageEngine is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Kaseya holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Kaseya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

461 Views
278 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 51 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

3,524 Views
2,081 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

```html

ManageEngine OpManager and Kaseya Traverse are leading players in the network monitoring category. OpManager seems to have the upper hand with its extensive device and network monitoring capabilities, while Kaseya's strength lies in data processing and scalability.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers extensive device monitoring, a proactive alert system, and net-flow analysis, enhancing server monitoring and integration. Kaseya Traverse delivers effective data processing, robust infrastructure monitoring, and a clear IT stack view useful for troubleshooting.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager needs better stability during upgrades, improved backup solutions, and enhanced AI functionalities. It also requires an overhaul of documentation and dashboard customization. Kaseya Traverse faces challenges with reporting, a lack of a CMDB, and needs improved integration capabilities and advanced AI functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager is primarily on-premises, encountering challenges needing escalation, and offers mixed support reviews. Kaseya Traverse offers flexible deployment through hybrid and public cloud options, providing good initial service and support, albeit not 24/7.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is affordable and cost-effective with pricing based on device count, offering quick ROI with reduced burdens. Kaseya Traverse presents competitive base pricing with all-inclusive features, though seen as pricey by some. ROI is achieved through increased uptime and faster resolutions.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Kaseya Traverse vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,466 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

69th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (37th)

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

"The solution's most valuable features are reporting, event notifications, and alert management."

"The setup was easy."

"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."

"Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics."

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most."

"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."

"Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."

"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."

"ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues."

"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."

"With regard to configurations, however, it would be nice to have more documentation on SNMP configurations. For example, if I want to add a new vendor, it would be great if ManageEngine provided the requirements for that vendor, such as the commands needed."

"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."

"The data provided by the tool is not accurate."

"They should add more features to URL monitoring."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"It is reasonably priced."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

31%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Non Profit

Educational Organization

50%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

See all answers

Comparisons

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 49% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 27% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 24% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 24% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 12% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

March 2025

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpManager

Overview

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Free Report: Kaseya Traverse vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaseya Traverse vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaseya Traverse vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.