Trellix Endpoint Security ENS and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are two leading solutions in endpoint protection. Kaspersky stands out due to its comprehensive features suggesting better value.
Features: Trellix ENS offers robust threat detection, prevention capabilities, and seamless integration with other security tools. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides extensive threat intelligence, automated response mechanisms, and advanced security features. Users highlight Kaspersky's superior automation and intelligence.
Room for Improvement:Trellix ENS can improve by reducing false positives, enhancing documentation, and refining user interface design. Kaspersky users desire better reporting tools, faster incident response, and streamlined user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Trellix ENS offers straightforward deployment with responsive customer support. Kaspersky has a more complex deployment process but provides detailed documentation and reliable support.
Pricing and ROI: Trellix ENS is cost-effective with high ROI due to strong support services. Kaspersky is more expensive, but users justify the cost with its advanced feature set and high-quality protection indicating favorable ROI.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
They were fairly responsive and able to resolve the issue.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
It is very easy for me to scale.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good.
We face challenges with the automated effective awareness platform program (ASAP), particularly with its implementation.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
I use Kaspersky to protect the domain and the network, allowing or denying web categories according to business needs.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is effective, especially in isolating computers from the network when needed.
Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.
It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.
ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.