LiveAction LiveNX vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,268 Views
1,665 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and LiveAction LiveNX compete in network and IT monitoring. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand in customization and event management, while LiveAction LiveNX stands out in real-time network monitoring.

Features: ScienceLogic provides a customizable platform with dynamic apps, multi-tenant management, and integration capabilities. It offers flexibility and comprehensive system monitoring. LiveAction LiveNX specializes in real-time network monitoring, visual analytics, and a robust alerting system, enhancing operational efficiency by quickly identifying network issues.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users mention the need for better SNMP and API expansion, a simpler interface, and an improved knowledge base. LiveAction LiveNX users suggest improvement in multi-tenancy, enhanced documentation, and more proactive alert features, with a need for better integration with external platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports a range of environments, including on-premises and cloud setups, with strong customer and technical support. LiveAction LiveNX effectively deploys in on-premises and private cloud environments but may face challenges with multi-tenancy. Customer service is generally good, though support experiences can vary.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is flexible but can be expensive for enterprise customers, with licensing based on device and storage usage. Users report significant ROI through reduced incidents and enhanced monitoring. LiveAction LiveNX is costly with limited cost-cutting options, with ROI driven by efficient issue resolution and proactive management, yet pricing flexibility is a concern.

To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

LiveAction LiveNX vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

50th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (19th), AIOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Doshi

IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support

Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"It's very expensive."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 16% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 8% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

March 2025

Also Known As

LiveNX

No data available

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell