Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 27, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.3
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers highly responsive customer support, often resolving queries within hours, earning high user satisfaction ratings.
No sentiment score available
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance support is praised for its prompt, knowledgeable assistance, especially with Premier Support's swift resolutions.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.7
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs improvements in support, UI, communication, out-of-network patching, intelligence, reporting, setup, updates, speed, compatibility, testing, pricing, and hardware management.
Sentiment score
4.9
Users seek improved imaging, hardware, integration, automation, user interface, support, scalability, real-time accuracy, and multi-language enhancements for Quest KACE SMA.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus scales efficiently, supports many OS and apps, and users appreciate its manageable licensing for large environments.
Sentiment score
7.7
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance is scalable and efficiently manages expanding IT infrastructures with minimal resource adjustments.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Users find ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus pricing moderate, with annual costs around $5,000 and varying opinions on affordability.
No sentiment score available
Quest KACE SMA provides cost-effective per-device licensing with extensive features, suitable for larger environments and inclusive support.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is highly stable, consistently performs well, and is easy to deploy and operate across servers and workstations.
Sentiment score
6.8
Quest KACE is stable and reliable, with minimal downtime and responsive support, though issues often stem from user mismanagement.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
Comprehensive, user-friendly centralized management tool offering multi-OS support, automation, patching, vulnerability management, and reporting with rollback capabilities.
Sentiment score
8.0
Quest KACE SMA integrates with Bomgar, offering efficient software distribution, asset management, automation, and enhanced security for IT operations.
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Quest KACE Systems Manageme...
Ranking in Patch Management
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (14th), Endpoint Compliance (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 9.9%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is 7.2%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Sereyreach Dy - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool for vulnerability patching and easy management of patches with a great technical support team
Products like Tenable or CrowdStrike offer a good and less complicated user interface. The user interface of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to be made more user-friendly, simplified, and less complicated. For additional features in the solution, I would want the solution to provide me with a detailed view of each patch. If the solution could copy that information and show it on the console, instead of having to click on the plugin ID or the plugin name to redirect you to the patch and all its related information, the need to be redirected to another website to read all the information can be eliminated, and it would be great.
Fernando Cezario - PeerSpot reviewer
Helpful for IT asset management and offer a good dashboard
I like the KACE software dashboard so much! It's convenient. I don't need to know technical details like file formats (PDF or whatever) for installation, even for applications like Adobe. Here's how I use it: Let's say I have a license for Adobe and I need to install it on a computer named Julian. I simply open a case, enter the name of the application (Adobe), open the dashboard, and search for the computer named Julian. Once I select the computer, it shows up in the dashboard. Now, in the same case, I can open a large batch of software, select the application (Adobe Acrobat again), and choose the computer named Julian. KACE then deploys the application with minimal errors, usually within one or two minutes. Julian even receives a notification on their computer that the installation process has begun. It's fantastic! Moreover, it helped so much streamline our IT asset management and inventory. Sometimes someone changes the computer assigned to someone else. For example, Juliano had a computer, and then Matos changed it to his own use. I wouldn't know about this change if it weren't for KACE. KACE automatically tracks this information and saves it for me, allowing me to call it up on the dashboard. For example, if I need to find Juliano's computer in the system, I don't need to search through endless spreadsheets. I just search for "Juliano" in KACE. KACE also lists other details like the last login user. So, if I see "Juliano" on KACE but a different user is logged in, that tells me something might be wrong. I find this functionality very helpful for IT asset management.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
12%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
The solution needs to improve its testing environment and reporting. For example, if a patch doesn't work for SQL 9 but works for SQL 10, a comparison report would be helpful. I think ManageEngine ...
What do you like most about Quest KACE Systems Management?
KACE automatically tracks this information and saves it for me, allowing me to call it up on the dashboard. For example, if I need to find Juliano's computer in the system, I don't need to search t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest KACE Systems Management?
It is expensive in Brazil. Generally, it's considered expensive, especially compared to solutions like Spiceworks.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Dell KACE Systems Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Waypoint, Mattos Filho, Meetic, Gems Education, Green Clinic HealthSystem, Service King
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.