Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (18th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.5%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Muhammed Abdul Gafoor

Chief Information Officer at Future Generations Computers LLC

Has an easy initial setup process, but there could be more integration options

The initial setup is easy. I rate the process a seven or eight out of ten. We have LPR procurement. The deployment involves installing the product and adding a license. It takes three to four days to complete and requires a team of less than ten people to execute the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The extendability is great."

"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."

"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."

"It's a stable solution with good performance."

"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."

"Technical support is excellent."

"The technical support services are good."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

Cons

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."

"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

"Upgrading to new versions isn't easy and it can take a long time. Also, other solutions' tamper protection features are better than FireEye's. Clients should have access to our local information, but they shouldn't change settings on the system itself."

"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."

"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."

"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."

"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"The product has average pricing."

"The price is comparable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Government

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The price is comparable. We do not have a problem with the pricing. I rate the pricing a five or six out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the solution.

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The product does not have technical partners in the Middle East. It only has sales partners. I do not like the sales partners in UAE. They did not support me when I needed help with security. The v...

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 16% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 34% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 16% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Information Not Available

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection