Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.5, while WithSecure is ranked #51 with an average rating of 7.0. Trellix holds a 1.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews
  • 4,570 Views
  • 3,544 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 1,798 Views
  • 1,353 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are both highly regarded solutions in the endpoint security market. Users appreciate the superior feature set and comprehensive security offerings of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, making it a popular choice despite the favorable pricing and support of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS).

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is praised for its robust threat detection, incident response capabilities, and integration with other security tools. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is noted for its advanced malware protection, user-friendly management features, and innovative security functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Users of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) express the need for improvements in performance optimization, reduction of system resource consumption, and better user interface design. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection users suggest enhancements in threat reporting, quicker update releases, and more detailed user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) receives mixed reviews on its deployment process, with some users finding it complex. The customer service is generally well-reviewed. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection users report an easier deployment process and efficient customer support, positioning WithSecure as more favorable in this category due to simplicity and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and perceived high return on investment. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, although seen as more expensive, is valued for delivering significant ROI through its advanced security features and performance. Users find WithSecure worth the higher price due to the benefits it offers.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
27th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
51st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.
Read full review
Muhammed Abdul Gafoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an easy initial setup process, but there could be more integration options
The initial setup is easy. I rate the process a seven or eight out of ten. We have LPR procurement. The deployment involves installing the product and adding a license. It takes three to four days to complete and requires a team of less than ten people to execute the process.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The independent modules are very good."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"MVISION offers decent protection."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros
"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."
"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."
"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."
"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."
"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."
"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."
"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."
 

Cons

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."
"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"I would like to see more automation."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons
"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."
"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."
"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."
"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."
"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."
"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."
"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice
"The product has average pricing."
"The price is comparable."
"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."
"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Government
11%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The notifications and patch management features are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The price is comparable. We do not have a problem with the pricing. I rate the pricing a five or six out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The product does not have technical partners in the Middle East. It only has sales partners. I do not like the sales partners in UAE. They did not support me when I needed help with security. The v...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 17% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 14% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 11% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 7% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 37% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 17% of the time
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 10% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 5% of the time
Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 5% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
March 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
March 2025
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business
 

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response. 

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix
WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
April 2025
Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.