

Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Cisco Meraki MX compete in the network security category. Cisco Meraki MX appears to have the upper hand due to its ease of remote management and advanced cloud-based features.
Features: Sophos Cyberoam UTM offers identity-based security with web and application filtering, VPN functionality, and detailed reporting. Cisco Meraki MX provides cloud-managed operations, Auto VPN, SD-WAN capabilities, and easy integration.
Room for Improvement: Sophos Cyberoam UTM could enhance scalability, improve content filtering, and expand new feature development. Cisco Meraki MX could improve logging detail, offer more competitive pricing, and refine its VPN capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos Cyberoam UTM, suitable for on-premises deployment, is easy to set up but faces occasional support delays. Cisco Meraki MX excels in both cloud and on-premises setups, praised for quick installation and reliable support, though some users seek faster service.
Pricing and ROI: Sophos Cyberoam UTM is seen as cost-effective, though pricing can be high for smaller organizations. Cisco Meraki MX is often noted for high licensing costs but provides value through reduced management overhead and simplified remote management, leading to favorable ROI.
I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management.
You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.
It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware.
When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting.
Cisco's TAC support for Cisco Meraki MX is excellent because no other OEM provides support at this level.
Cisco is one of the best vendors in the market.
They resolve issues timely once connected.
Technical support is effective and responsive.
I would rate their technical support a solid nine out of ten.
When you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.
The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.
Cisco Meraki MX scales with my growing needs for my organization very well because they are easy to deploy.
There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits.
I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX.
I assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as good, and I have experienced no downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.
Data is the only path, so optimization is essential.
An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.
For Sophos Cyberoam UTM, you don't really have that access that can give you those network flexibilities that would allow you to do some other types of architectures.
It would be beneficial if phone calls or SMS for two-factor authentication were available.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM should move in the direction of AI capabilities, as the world is moving toward AI.
I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.
The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.
If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses.
The price is appropriate, but if you want the real truth, it's actually quite expensive.
Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.
Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection.
Cisco Meraki MX API makes it really easy for me to automate a lot of changes over several thousand devices.
It provides bandwidth management, category management of websites, blocking certain elements, IPS blocking, DDoS protection, and VPN management between sites and clients.
I assess the benefit of Sophos Cyberoam UTM's centralized management for multi-appliance handling as a welcome feature because you can manage all the devices at one location, giving you notifications of downtime and updates without necessarily logging into each appliance, so that central management is a very genius move.
The way the rule sets are configured makes it an easily understandable way to manage.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki MX | 8.2% |
| Sophos Cyberoam UTM | 3.0% |
| Other | 88.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 48 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 28 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Cisco Meraki MX offers cloud-managed security with user-friendly setup and efficient management, enhancing VPN and firewall functionalities for businesses.
Cisco Meraki MX is known for its robust cloud-based network management, featuring AutoVPN, SD-WAN, and advanced security. Its centralized control over firewall, traffic shaping, and monitoring ensures excellent connectivity and security. The interface allows easy management by non-technical staff, offering remote access and seamless network performance through real-time alerts and troubleshooting. It supports global connectivity with minimal effort, addressing needs across small to enterprise environments. Despite its strengths, users point out areas needing improvement like load balancing, VPN features, more flexible logging, and session capabilities. Pricing, integration limits, and licensing need enhancement.
What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?In industries like retail, finance, and education, Cisco Meraki MX provides enhanced security and connectivity. Retail chains benefit from easy VPN setups for secure multi-site networking, while educational institutions find value in its ability to manage large campuses efficiently. Financial services leverage its robust security features to protect sensitive data, ensuring compliance and trust.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM integrates diverse security features for efficient network management. Its multifunctional platform supports scalability and robust protection, catering to sectors like finance, education, and government, effectively securing remote operations and managing internet connectivity.
Offering centralized management, Sophos Cyberoam UTM stands out for its thorough threat protection, identity-based security, and flexibility in remote access. Its seamless integration with Active Directory and strong endpoint protection are key highlights. Users benefit from comprehensive reporting, application filtering, and effective bandwidth management. Core strengths are countered by challenges in scalability, VPN consistency, and detailed reporting. There's a call for improvements in web filtering, documentation, and hardware reliability, along with enhanced GUI accessibility and added AI capabilities.
What are the key features of Sophos Cyberoam UTM?In finance, Sophos Cyberoam UTM aids in threat management and internet monitoring. Education sectors use it for secure access control. Government organizations deploy it for reliable remote connections and malware protection. It's pivotal for firms needing web filtering and app control to maintain network efficiency.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.