Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs SAP Data Hub [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Additionally, 84% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 60 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

14,665 Views
12,319 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Read 3 SAP Data Hub [EOL] reviews

66% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

SAP Data Hub EOL and Microsoft Purview Data Governance compete in data management and governance solutions. Microsoft Purview appears superior due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities.

Features: SAP Data Hub EOL focuses on strong data pipeline orchestration, integration across heterogeneous environments, and ensuring data processing at scale. Microsoft Purview offers robust data cataloging capabilities, end-to-end data lineage tracking, and seamless compliance adherence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Data Hub EOL requires significant resources for deployment, leading to longer timelines. Microsoft Purview provides streamlined deployment with better cloud integration, ensuring faster implementation. Microsoft's customer service is more responsive and supportive throughout the deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Data Hub EOL offers a favorable pricing structure, potentially lowering initial setup costs, but its long-term ROI is impacted by integration complexity. Microsoft Purview, while initially costlier, demonstrates a higher ROI through efficient deployment and robust features, providing long-term value in data governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Governance Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 895,272 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (12th)

SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Ayinampudi Srikanth

Tech lead at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated data discovery has streamlined management while configuration remains complex

Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI. The interface feels a little complicated compared to Big-ID. I did not appreciate the configuration part. It felt complex, whereas when I went for a Big-ID demo, the interface looked better and was easier to understand for any user.

Read full review

Vijaya Macherla

GTM Lead at Capgemini

The solution is seamless, but the database sometimes leads to confusion

We used to have multiple different kinds of databases, which internally, had different compliance levels. Retention management is very different now. If the policy is live and the claim has been completed, I couldn't archive the claim. I needed to keep a reference integrity of that claim and understand which policy paid out the claim. With this solution, the policy came in six months ago and qualified for archiving. The claim had been paid and in every environment, the claim had been closed, including the reporting system, the claims system, etc. With the payment set gateway, I can just go and archive. But, we had a hard time during this process. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, the potential for this solution is really large."

"Their data labeling or data classification is particularly valuable because we want to categorize all of our data into confidential, public, or internal."

"You can set up automated dates to alert on internal data."

"Data segregation is the most valuable feature."

"The data protection feature is vital as it controls who can access data when it moves out of our protected boundary."

"The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization."

"The data protection feature is vital as it controls who can access data when it moves out of our protected boundary."

"It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

"The most valuable feature is the S/4HANA 1909 On-Premise"

"They lead in terms of business functions, and no other solution has business functions already implemented to perform business analysis, with a lot of prebuilt business functions for machine learning and orchestration that we can use directly to get an analysis out from the existing enterprise data."

"Its connection to on-premise products is the most valuable. We mostly use the on-premise connection, which is seamless. This is what we prefer in this solution over other solutions. We are using it the most for the orchestration where the data is coming from different categories. Its other features are very much similar to what they are giving us in open source. Their push-down approach is the most advantageous, where they push most of the processing on to the same data source. This means that they have a serverless kind of thing, and they don't process the data inside a product such as Data Hub. They process the data from where the data is coming out. If it is coming from HANA, to capture the data or process it for analytics, orchestration, or management, they go to the HANA database and give it out. They don't process it on Data Hub. This push-down approach increases the processing speed a little bit because the data is processed where it is sitting. That's the best part and an advantage. I have used another product where they used to capture the data first and then they used to process it and give it. In Data Hub, it is in reverse. They process it first and give it, and then they put their own manipulations. They lead in terms of business functions. No other solution has business functions already implemented to perform business analysis. They have a lot of prebuilt business functions for machine learning and orchestration, which we can use directly to get an analysis out from the existing data. Most of the data is sitting as enterprise data there. That's a major advantage that they have."

"SAP is one of the most seamless ERPs that have integrated SAP archiving within Excel. I have not seen this with any other database."

"Having this solution enables us to approach our clients to upgrade their databases, and we upgrade them according to their business requirements."

Cons

"Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI."

"I rate Microsoft support six out of 10. The standard support is acceptable, but sometimes it doesn't respond fast enough. Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations."

"We are currently in the rollout phase, so I am not entirely sure about specific areas of improvement. However, there are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded."

"The support could be better, particularly with consulting."

"It could reduce pricing to encourage usage."

"There are differences when looking at an incident in the M365 portal versus Purview, and the main one is the advanced hunting. In the M365 portal, you can write KQL queries and fetch data. If that was available in Purview, it would be very good."

"Support should be improved in the form of good documentation and video lessons where a person can check things out. There is a community, but it takes a lot of time if we want to get an answer to a question."

"We have had some issues automating our document management with Power Apps. I haven't been super-disappointed with anything except for Power Apps, which kinda drives me nuts. I think it's because I am a coder who can do things properly, and I keep trying to do things there, but it's not working out the way. The security team is pretty quick. I'm kind of a thorn in their side. I always try to get around stuff. They haven't come to me for anything saying, "Hey, I can't find this information." They're pretty good. Maybe, there's a lack of documentation, but that doesn't seem to be an issue for our team."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

"The company has everything offshore."

"In 2018, connecting it to outside sources, such as IoT products or IoT-enabled big data Hadoop, was a little complex. It was not smooth at the beginning. It was unstable. It took a lot of time for the initial data load. Sometimes, the connection broke, and we had to restart the process, which was a major issue, but they might have improved it now. It is very smooth with SAP HANA on-premise system, SAP Cloud Platform, and SAP Analytics Cloud. It could be because these are their own products, and they know how to integrate them. With Hadoop, they might have used open-source technologies, and that's why it was breaking at that time. They are providing less embedded integration because they want us to use their other products. For example, they don't want to go and remove SAP Analytics Cloud and put everything in Data Hub. They want us to use SAP Analytics Cloud somewhere else and not inside the Data Hub. On the integration part, it lacks real-time analytics, and it is slow. They should embed the SAP Analytics Cloud inside Data Hub or support some kind of analysis. They do provide some analysis, but it is not extensive. They are moreover open source. So, we need a lot of developers or data scientists to go in and implement Python algorithms. It would be better if they can provide their own existing algorithms and give some connections and drop-down menus to go and just configure those. It will make things really quick by increasing the embedded integrations. It will also improve the process efficiency and processing power. Its performance needs improvement. It is a little slow. It is not the best in the market, and there are other products that are much better than this. In terms of technology and performance, it is a little slow as compared to Microsoft and other data orchestration products. I haven't used other products, but I have read about those products, their settings, and the milliseconds that they do. In Azure Purview, they say that they can copy, manage, or transform the data within milliseconds. They say that they can transform 100 gigabytes of data within three to five seconds, which is something SAP cannot do. It generally takes a lot of time to process that much amount of data. However, I have never tested out Azure."

"Nowadays there are some inconsistencies in data bases, however, they upgrade and release the versions to market."

"Its performance needs improvement. It is a little slow. It is not the best in the market, and there are other products that are much better than this."

"Nowadays there are some inconsistencies in data bases, however, they upgrade and release the versions to market."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is cheap. It is based on consumption. If somebody wants to start using it, the price is definitely cheaper than a tool like Collibra."

"The pricing depends on the client's requirements and the number of applications."

"It's not cheap. I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive."

"Price-wise, I think it's very generous and accessible to not just enterprises but small to medium-sized companies as well. I think it's very fair in terms of how they break apart the storage and the actual computing, and that makes it very accessible. So, that is a very big plus for Purview."

"The price is a little bit high, but it's worth the money because it has a lot of features."

"Microsoft Purview has a pay-per-use pricing model, so it's one of the most cost-effective tools, as your cost will be based on your usage. It's a pricing model that Microsoft has nailed down, making it great whether you're a small organization or a multinational, giant organization."

"The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."

"Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

"The Cloud is very expensive, but SAP HANA previous service is okay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

895,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	33

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

The features in the actual data governance could be improved, and I think there is room for improvement in the product. We haven't used role-based access control in a complex way; it's somehow embe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Purview?

We are currently working with Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other Microsoft products. We are using Microsoft Purview Data Governance.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 11% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 11% of the time

Google Knowledge Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 6% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Collibra Platform vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

SAS Data Management vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAP Data Hub [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Data Hub [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

May 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

April 2026

Download SAP Data Hub [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Purview Data Governance provides comprehensive data cataloging, lineage, and classification across multi-cloud environments, integrating seamlessly with Azure to enhance data management and compliance with flexible APIs.

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is designed to streamline data management processes through effective data cataloging, lineage tracking, and classification, all within multi-cloud environments. It supports seamless integration with Azure, enabling metadata consolidation and flexible API data exchange, which contributes to enhanced governance. The platform emphasizes critical compliance and security by offering real-time compliance visibility. Automation features, role-based security, and native app connectivity are included to optimize time and resource expenditure. Users appreciate AI-driven risk detection and customizable classifications, effectively managing sensitive information. However, areas for improvement include data quality features, better integration with non-Microsoft products, and enhancing its interface intuitiveness. Improvements are also sought for role management, compliance reporting, support for diverse data sources, efficient lineage tracking, DLP capabilities, documentation, integration with external cloud platforms, and training resources. Real-time notifications and enhanced scanning are highlighted for better data management.

What are the essential features?

Data Cataloging: Streamlines documenting and managing data assets
Data Lineage: Tracks data flow to ensure compliance and transparency
Data Classification: Identifies and categorizes data for improved management
Seamless Azure Integration: Facilitates smooth interaction with Microsoft's ecosystem
Flexible API Data Exchange: Allows easy data sharing across platforms

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Time Efficiency: Automation and native connectivity reduce manual tasks
Enhanced Security: Role-based access and real-time compliance visibility
AI-Driven Insights: Detects risks and manages sensitive data effectively
Workflow Improvement: Integration with Microsoft tools enhances processes

Industries implement Microsoft Purview Data Governance to leverage its data cataloging, lineage, and loss prevention capabilities. The tool assists in scanning and documentation of data sources, aiding in data classification, governance, and compliance. Integration with tools like Synapse and Power Platform enables streamlined data management and improved data security across cloud-based and on-premises environments.

Microsoft

The SAP® Data Hub solution enables sophisticated data operations management. It gives you the capability and flexibility to connect enterprise data and Big Data and gain a deep understanding of data and information processes across sources and systems throughout the distributed landscape. The unified solution provides visibility and control into data opportunities, integrating cloud and on-premise information and driving data agility and business value. Distributed processing power enables greater speed and efficiency.

SAP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Kaeser Kompressoren, HARTMANN

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

895,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.