MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Zapier comparison

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 41 Zapier reviews

678 Views
465 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Zapier compete in the integration and automation category. MuleSoft seems to have the upper hand for enterprises needing comprehensive API management and robust hybrid integration solutions, while Zapier excels for simpler, code-free automation workflows.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers robust API management, hybrid integration capabilities, and a diverse range of connectors, providing a comprehensive toolkit for enterprise-grade solutions. It also features strong monitoring and API reusability. Zapier specializes in connecting disparate cloud applications through automated workflows, emphasizing ease of use, rapid setup of automation, and offering an extensive library of integrations.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft faces hurdles with pricing complexity, technical support responsiveness, and the need for faster release cycles. Users mention pricing as a barrier for smaller businesses and suggest enhancements in AI capabilities. Zapier requires improvements in handling complex business logic within Zaps, connection reliability, and faster support responses. Users frequently mention the need for better functionality in multi-step workflows and advanced decision-making capabilities.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform supports multiple deployment models such as public, private, and hybrid clouds, making it versatile for enterprise requirements. Customer service feedback is mixed, with some users noting slower response times. Zapier focuses on ease of deployment primarily in the public cloud, with users citing positive experiences with their proactive support team, though advanced API integrations can pose complexity.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is considered expensive with a complex pricing model, potentially deterring smaller organizations. Larger enterprises likely see significant ROI due to its robust integration capabilities. Zapier offers a more accessible pricing structure with a free plan for basic needs and flexible paid plans appealing to startups and small to medium businesses. While costs may increase with complex tasks, most users find the pricing justifiable due to time savings and functionality provided.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Zapier Report (Updated: March 2025).

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Zapier

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Zapier

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 6.7%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zapier is 1.9%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

FrankHo

Analyst at MSXI

Though the tool offers a visually appealing UI, it needs to improve its documentation

With Zapier, improvements are required in the areas of concerns like bugs, ease of use, and documentation. The product has many bugs, so users have to wait for a period ranging from five minutes to an hour to see where the Zap went. In Zapier, Zaps aren't very understandable owing to the way they work. As a user, you would think that in Zapier, a Zap works in a particular way once you set it up, but it won't happen. At times, some Zaps can interfere with each other, because of which there might be infinite loops that may occur, owing to which multiple Zaps continue to run or break down in general, after which nothing would run in your environment. You would not be notified about the breakdown of Zaps. The bugs in the product may be considered to understand or get an explanation of how Zaps works between software systems, so for something between Gmail and HubSpot, Zapier would explain through better documentation what would work and what wouldn't work. Maybe if Zapier had better functionality with Python or any other coding language in general, it would make the product a lot better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good interface, simple to use and stable."

"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."

"The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API."

"The tool's visual features are attractive."

"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."

"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."

"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."

"Webhooks are the most valuable feature of Zapier."

"The initial setup is pretty easy to do."

"We find it effortless to set up. We really don't have to do anything other than finding the application in the Zapier catalog. And as long as the application has been re-integrated into Zapier, they're able to then just provide the connection details and hook it up."

"The connection between Facebook lead forms and MailChimp integrations is the most valuable feature."

"There are a few valuable features, like the stability that it comes with and also the number of features that it offers. I've used other services like Pabbly, but they don't offer similar numbers of applications that Zapier has or allows to integrate with – it's maximum."

"The solution is a SaaS and does not require a complex setup."

"With the previous CRM we were using – the Google Ads landing pages we had – we were collecting leads manually. That process was not efficient and took a sales team a lot of time to insert these leads manually. Currently, the process is smooth and we use Zapier to collect the leads for us."

More Zapier pros

Cons

"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."

"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."

"The customer service is not good enough"

"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"Being able to share Zaps and organize them with teammates would allow sharing and refining scenarios and even combining steps that require different people's credentials."

"I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted."

"Zapier needs more YouTube or video tutorials or more training for people. That would help a lot. In particular, Zapier should have documentation for every connector. Its documentation needs to be more detailed and visual."

"The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments."

"Some recent changes to the solution have made it bulky and not as intuitive to use as it previously was."

"The solution does not work properly when we apply filters and we get errors."

"Zapier could be a little faster, but that might not be possible. I would encourage Zapier to make more API endpoints for each application"

"After mapping them out, and they'd worked for a while, I've had Zapier fail."

More Zapier cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"The solution has a high price."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"Zapier's price is good."

"The price of Zapier is approximately $75 monthly."

"The least expensive plan is $24 a month, and you can go all the way to $800 a month if you're a huge company using many tasks."

"Per task, there is a monthly plan involving 15 euros...Also, in different forms, they just give you the ability to use different features. They charge 18.58 euros for the first standard plan, which includes 750 tasks. So, it is about 25 cents per task."

"It's very straightforward licensing. There's only one cost you have to pay, and if you want a relevant pricing plan, I think you have two or three different models or packages which include the number of notifications or Zaps, as they call it, that you can program."

"Think your Zaps through to make sure you don't use more Zaps than you need."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"There is a free plan that is, of course, limited. However, it allows you to understand and check true scenarios for a while."

More Zapier pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

University

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

What do you like most about Zapier?

The product's most valuable feature is automation.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zapier?

The pricing is suitable. It's not cheap, but not expensive.

What needs improvement with Zapier?

The pricing could be a little cheaper.

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Coefficient vs Zapier

Compared 24% of the time

Fivetran vs Zapier

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Glue vs Zapier

Compared 12% of the time

Coupler.io vs Zapier

Compared 10% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Zapier

Compared 10% of the time

More Zapier Competitors

Product Reports

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Download Zapier product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

No data available

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Zapier is a tool for primarily non-technical users to connect together web apps.

An integration between two apps is called a Zap. A Zap is made up of a Trigger and one or more Actions or Searches.

Whenever the trigger happens in one app, Zapier will automatically perform the actions or searches in another app in order.

Zaps are very lightweight and easy to set up. Zaps do not import or export old data (they only operate on new items created after the Zap is enabled). Zaps are also not kept in sync ("two way syncing") after the Zap is triggered.

Zaps are deceivingly simple if you're used to dealing with complex and difficult integrations. Their simplicity is what enables anyone to create them.

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

BuzzFeed, Groupon, Spotify, Columbia University, FOX

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Zapier