Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NinjaOne vs Scappman comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne
Ranking in Patch Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (23rd), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Remote Access (11th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (9th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), MSP Backup (4th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th)
Scappman
Ranking in Patch Management
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Aziz Lyazami - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that helps with a lot of configurations and creates automation processes that work perfectly
I had recently dealt with something that was frustrating in NinjaOne, but I don't remember what it was. I would love it if I could deploy automation processes for locations because, currently, at my workplace, we can't deploy automation processes for locations. In NinjaOne, there is a need to create groups. I already have 12 or 14 locations, where sometimes I just want to deploy some updates, software, or something for specific locations, but I can't do so since I have to go and create a group for that location, which is a lot more work, which I don't like. I would love it if the aforementioned area is considered for improvement. The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best. I think NinjaOne has been working on its ticketing system. I have seen how there has been a huge improvement in the tool recently, but it is still not as good as the ticket systems in the market. At my workplace, we don't use ticketing systems. I am waiting for NinjaOne to improve its ticketing system so that I can use it. There is a lot of room for growth and adding more features in NinjaOne. I love how NinjaOne gives its users the possibility to create a custom field, allowing them to create whatever they want. I haven't used NinjaOne a lot, so I don't have anything in mind as to what extra features it needs to have. If I just sit down and look at NinjaOne, I will get a list of things I would love to have in it.
Use Scappman?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Retailer
7%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NinjaOne?
NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?
The pricing for NinjaOne is appropriate for small companies. Customers feel that the cost is not too high for the features they need but might be unwilling to pay more for additional features such ...
What needs improvement with NinjaOne?
Improvements could be made to reduce NinjaOne's functionalities to focus more on inventory or remote help tools. Many features are not needed for our purposes currently. Security and reporting, inc...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Capital One 7. Chase 8. Citibank 9. Coca-Cola 10. Delta Air Lines 11. Disney 12. FedEx 13. Ford 14. Google 15. HP 16. IBM 17. Intel 18. JPMorgan Chase 19. Kraft Heinz 20. McDonald's 21. Merck 22. Microsoft 23. Nike 24. Oracle 25. PepsiCo 26. Procter & Gamble 27. Starbucks 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Visa
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.