No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

NinjaOne vs Scappman comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne
Ranking in Patch Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (8th), Network Monitoring Software (11th), Server Monitoring (3rd), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Remote Access (8th), Vulnerability Management (19th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (3rd), IT Alerting and Incident Management (6th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), MSP Backup (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (5th)
Scappman
Ranking in Patch Management
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of NinjaOne is 7.6%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Scappman is 0.7%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NinjaOne7.6%
Scappman0.7%
Other91.7%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Not Joseph Pearson - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials
Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support
NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.
Use Scappman?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I think it is very reasonable for the product that we get.
What needs improvement with NinjaOne?
To improve NinjaOne, there should be better integration between multiple different software including Cisco and Meraki.
What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?
My main use case for NinjaOne is managing machines over multiple networks and locations. For managing machines across those networks or locations, we have NinjaOne deployed on all our machines, and...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Capital One 7. Chase 8. Citibank 9. Coca-Cola 10. Delta Air Lines 11. Disney 12. FedEx 13. Ford 14. Google 15. HP 16. IBM 17. Intel 18. JPMorgan Chase 19. Kraft Heinz 20. McDonald's 21. Merck 22. Microsoft 23. Nike 24. Oracle 25. PepsiCo 26. Procter & Gamble 27. Starbucks 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Visa
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.