OneLogin by One Identity vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

One Identity and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. One Identity is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4, while Ping Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 100% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

OneLogin by One Identity

Read 17 OneLogin by One Identity reviews

1,109 Views
852 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 28 Ping Identity Platform reviews

4,240 Views
3,079 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin by One Identity

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

OneLogin by One Identity and Ping Identity Platform are two leading identity management solutions. While users praise OneLogin's features and pricing, Ping Identity Platform is noted for its robust capabilities, providing superior value despite higher costs.

Features: OneLogin by One Identity is valued for its ease of use, integration capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Ping Identity Platform is praised for its comprehensive suite, advanced security features, and detailed customer support.

Room for Improvement: OneLogin by One Identity users suggest enhancements in reporting tools, mobile app functionality, and user interface. Ping Identity Platform users indicate a need for simplified setup processes, clearer documentation, and complexity adjustments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin by One Identity is recognized for its straightforward deployment model and responsive customer service. Ping Identity Platform's deployment can be complex but is supported by detailed customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OneLogin by One Identity is often viewed as cost-effective with clear ROI. Ping Identity Platform’s higher setup costs are justified by its advanced features and security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OneLogin by One Identity

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

9th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

9th

Ranking in Access Management

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (6th), Identity Management (IM) (12th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

4th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

5th

Ranking in Access Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (5th), Data Governance (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Featured Reviews

Ben Ruset

Senior Director of Infrastructure at Whip Media

Streamlines access management with top-notch support, and a user-friendly interface, making it a highly effective solution for businesses of all sizes

During my evaluation of various products, one standout feature of OneLogin that impressed me was their mobile app for authentication through push notifications. Unlike traditional methods involving rotating codes, the OneLogin app simplifies the process by sending a push notification asking if the login attempt is legitimate. If confirmed, the login proceeds seamlessly. The primary benefit is its user-friendly interface, making it particularly accessible for non-technical users. One aspect I particularly appreciate is their exceptional customer support whenever I've needed assistance. Their sales team has also been highly responsive and helpful in connecting me with necessary resources, although we haven't faced any major challenges.

Read full review

Dilip Reddy

Ping Engineer at Equitable

Easy to use but requires improvements in the area of stability

In my company, we have worked on authorization, and I know that there are different types of grants. We have worked on the authorization code, client credentials, and ROPC grant. There are two types of tokens, like the JWT token and internally managed reference tokens. JWT tokens are useful for finding information related to the claim requests. Internally managed reference tokens are useful for dealing with visual data and information. For the clients to fit the user information, they need to do additional work to fit all the user info into the site, which is to define and validate the token issue and provide the request for VPNs. I worked on the key differences between the authorization code and implicit grant. In the authorization code type, you will have the authorization code issued initially to the client, and the client has to exchange it with the authorization server, like using a DAC channel to get the access token. In implicit grants, tokens are issued right away if the application is a single-page application. We can either use the authorization code or an implicit grant.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution allows the user to search logs based on a specific time."

"The single sign-on and the fact that we can integrate everything in one place and control from there were valuable features of this solution."

"Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin."

"Ease of integration with AD."

"The solution's ability to save and manage of all my passwords is great."

"When it comes to access management, the solution's single pane of glass is extremely important. The single pane of glass for access management enables collaborative work between IT and security. We have access to certain applications that require device trust. Based on the role, we can access those applications through OneLogin Desktop."

"The directory integration and SCIM provisioning are probably the best features compared to competitors."

"OneLogin is efficient."

More OneLogin by One Identity pros

"I like PingFederate."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."

"People use the solution to secure their applications and authenticate particular processes."

"It is a very stable solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"OneLogin offers a Virtual LDAP feature that we utilize, although it differs slightly from traditional LDAP servers."

"While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations."

"They have downtime twice a year or once in six months. During the downtime, the SSO page did not come up. When users wanted to get to their email, they were redirected to the OneLogin page, but the page did not come up, and MFA and logins failed. It completely crippled us."

"The tool must be made more robust."

"having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

"I'd like OneLogin to have a customization section that displays the company's offerings, categorized by different topics."

"We've been experiencing some pain points since the acquisition. For example, there have been some outages we didn't see previously, which are a big topic with my executive team. You have hundreds of applications relying on this service for login. If the service is unavailable, nobody can log into these applications."

"The uptime has not been great recently, with some outages lasting six, seven, or eight hours."

More OneLogin by One Identity cons

"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

"Sometimes, there are issues with its stability."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin is efficient.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

There have been some outages over the years. The uptime has not been great recently, with some outages lasting six, seven, or eight hours. Improvement in the stability of the infrastructure would b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

We use OneLogin by One Identity to provide SAML authentication and single sign-on for all of our SaaS apps.

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 25% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 16% of the time

Auth0 vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 15% of the time

LastPass vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

More OneLogin by One Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 25% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 11% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity

December 2024

Download OneLogin by One Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

December 2024

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

OneLogin, OneLogin Workforce Identity

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Learn More

One Identity

Ping Identity

Overview

OneLogin by One Identity is a cloud-based access management solution for the modern enterprise. It delivers secure access for every user, every app and every device to meet an organization’s Workforce and Customer and Identity and Access Management (CIAM) needs.

OneLogin provides secure single sign-on, multi-factor authentication (supporting a wide array of passwordless authentication factors), adaptive authentication, desktop-level MFA, directory integration with AD, LDAP, G Suite and other external directories, identity lifecycle management and much more. OneLogin advanced authentication capabilities provide multi-layer, context aware and risk-based protection, minimizing the most common attacks and resulting in increased security, a frictionless user experience, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Furthermore, OneLogin’s user-friendly interface and streamlined design make it easy for end users and IT administrators to navigate the platform and remain productive.

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Sample Customers

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

November 2024

Free Report: OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OneLogin by One Identity vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.