Parallels Access vs TeamViewer comparison

Parallels and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Access category. Parallels is ranked #23, while TeamViewer is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Parallels holds a 1.7% mindshare in VUS, compared to TeamViewer’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Parallels users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

TeamViewer Business and Parallels Access compete in the remote access solutions category. TeamViewer Business stands out for superior support and cost-effectiveness, while Parallels Access offers a richer feature set.

Features: TeamViewer Business provides secure remote access, file transfer capabilities, and scalable solutions for larger teams. Parallels Access offers a mobile-friendly design, seamless desktop application access, and optimized touch controls for enhanced productivity.

Room for Improvement: TeamViewer Business could improve by offering more intuitive mobile features, better cross-platform integration, and enhanced customization options. Parallels Access may benefit from more competitive pricing, expanded language support, and simplified interface for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamViewer Business offers an easy installation process and multilingual support, providing an edge with its robust customer service. Parallels Access also features an intuitive setup and excels in platform integration.

Pricing and ROI: TeamViewer Business offers flexible pricing plans for both small businesses and larger enterprises, making it a cost-effective solution. Parallels Access requires a higher initial investment but delivers a strong ROI with its advanced feature set enhancing productivity.

To learn more, read our detailed Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,118 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 5.9%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parallels Access is 1.7%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer is 8.2%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
TeamViewer	8.2%
Microsoft Intune	5.9%
Parallels Access	1.7%
Other	84.2%

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Binish Parikh

Vice President at ARK Infosolutions Pvt Ltd

Easy-to-deploy and good for small as well as large setups

There is room for improvement in the pricing policy. The price point is pretty aggressive. Since it is not very resource hungry, it doesn't require dedicated servers like high-end solutions do, so it's easier for customers to integrate it into their own solutions. In future releases, maybe more support for Macs and Unix so that customers with setups on those platforms can also benefit from the solutions.

Read full review

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Remote access has cut critical issue resolution time and supports faster production troubleshooting

Perhaps on the UI side of TeamViewer because we are connecting to different remote desktop connections or remote server connections. Whenever we are working on one of the production issues and we open multiple connections, it is very hectic or confusing to jump from one server to another server. Perhaps on the UI side, if they can improve something related to the view sessions or which session is connected to which remote server, that would be helpful. Perhaps something related to the authentication because it should have a proper authentication mechanism. Every developer should not access TeamViewer or the remote desktop by using TeamViewer. We always have a proper authentication or multifactor authentication mechanism in place, so only those on on-call support or P1 support at that time can access the remote server, but not anyone else. I chose nine out of 10 because sometimes we face the session timeout issue. Suppose during the production support, we connect to one of the remote servers, and if it is idle for approximately 10 or 15 minutes, the session timeout happens. We have to follow the same authentication mechanism to connect to the remote server again. During the session timeout, it delays our process or the troubleshooting steps, which is the reason I have given nine out of 10 instead of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Intune impacts my organization positively by saving significant time via faster onboarding; there is no requirement for manual imaging or setup."

"The ability to manage devices over the cloud is a big benefit, as devices now receive updates regardless of location."

"The best thing about Intune for the customers is simply that it's included in the different plans of Microsoft 365."

"I have no issues with the scalability and ability to expand Microsoft Intune."

"The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively."

"It works well if you have a Microsoft environment."

"Our main use is Intune's management of mobile devices, like Android or iPhone devices. The application performs quite well for both types. We successfully managed almost 3,000 endpoints."

"The initial setup is not complex."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"Parallels Access gives me full access and control of the computer, and I can do anything I want remotely."

"The application used to publish for mobile devices is very good and the desktop publishing is very, very good."

"It's great that the total deployment can happen completely remotely."

"It's got a very easy-to-use interface."

"Parallels Access has flexible licensing policies, which is beneficial for customers who have intermittent usage or users who are on and off the system."

"What seems to be the most valuable from the customer side is the ease of operation, and the overall experience they have."

"We don't have problems with stability. Everything is good."

"TeamViewer Business does a lot in the enterprise part and has many features that can be used in big organizations, and it is able to assist on the network side, monitoring, security side, and remote side, making it a good platform and solution to use."

"It is very easy to configure and very easy to use."

"The implementation is quite straightforward."

"It is a great, amazing tool; all companies need to have it, and it's secure, fast, and reliable."

"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use."

"We have hundreds of remote key users, a lot of whom are non-native English speakers, and using TeamViewer allows my team and I to resolve any issue directly, without having to translate on the phone or by email."

"It’s so great for when you need to provide remote support, allowing us to troubleshoot in real-time, with good configuration and structure, easy installation, strong stability, good scalability, and it isn’t expensive at all."

"I find the mouse control and the ability to click for them very effective. I can move the mouse and click on buttons as if sitting at their computer. These are the basic features I use most often in the solution. There are tricker features that I don't use much because I don't need them frequently. Overall, it's a great tool for helping others with their computer issues without traveling to their location or another building."

More TeamViewer pros

Cons

"I assess the stability of the product as low. I have faced downtime crashes and performance issues with Microsoft Intune."

"I would like to see Intune improve its handling of hybrid domain joins. We continue to experience issues with machines losing their hybrid domain join status."

"There is room for improvement in integrating additional features such as Purview and SharePoint activities into Intune."

"Intune could be improved by organizing different solutions, like Defender and Sentinel, into a single package. This would allow us to focus on security while Microsoft manages other areas. Having a unified solution would drive better management of various sectors. Although the Intune user experience is good, we should continue enhancing it."

"If you could replace SCCM completely with Intune, that would be fantastic so that you don't have to run SCCM with Intune as an extension."

"Automatic updating is pretty rough. It doesn't give me as much control as I had in the past."

"The major problem with this product is that there can be delays in the deployment of new policies."

"Intune is not the most user-friendly mobile device management platform available."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"One challenge we do notice is that the application is limited to Windows servers only. If a customer has a Linux server, things get complicated. They should open it up a bit to be more compatible with different types of servers."

"They could improve the reporting."

"The solution may not scale well for enterprises."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing policy. The price point is pretty aggressive."

"When you want to transfer a file from your iPad or remote device to the computer, the copy-and-paste feature doesn't always work."

"The scalability is great for small or medium-sized businesses. However, it may not scale well for enterprise-level entities."

"The product could be less expensive."

"Sometimes it lags."

"If were to I put myself in the seat of a small business owner, I would prefer TeamViewer to be more of a pay-once-and-own-it solution, rather than paying via a subscription model (although I am using the free version). Only annual subscriptions are available. It makes paying for it the first time seem a little daunting."

"It does what I need it to do but I think it's expensive."

"Sometimes we'll have a device in the field, and I'll click on remote control and it says "Can't authenticate." I'll double click in a different part of the TeamViewer interface and it'll say "Can't authenticate." Then I'll do it a third time and it connects. It's possible that it's just bad luck. It's also very possible that it's some bug within TeamViewer..."

"Wish it would support multiple support persons at the same time to assist a client for situations that need team collaboration."

"A feature that they could add is chat with sound to talk."

"Support for mobile devices from Linux has been missing since the Native client was rolled out. This was a nice option, especially when trying to walk somebody who was struggling to understand something on their phone."

More TeamViewer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Intune's costliness stems from licensing fees and the overhead associated with its management, user experience, and device remediation."

"If you're ever going to buy an Office 365 environment, then pricing is reasonable given all that it does, but if you're not, then you might find the pricing expensive."

"It is not expensive."

"It's affordable for the protection it gives. There are no additional costs."

"There is a license needed to use the solution and we are on an annual license."

"Microsoft Intune is not cost-effective as a standalone product."

"There is a cost benefit of using Microsoft Intune because of the packaging with other Microsoft products."

"We are partners, so we receive some discount. However, from the customer's perspective, Microsoft Intune's pricing is competitive with non-Microsoft technology, and the price is good compared to other market competitors."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The licensing costs are about $100 per user."

"TeamViewer has multiple licensing options."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"The cost is in the thousands of dollars per year."

"TeamViewer's price is cheaper than some other similar solutions. We have licenses for our users."

"We're using the free version. We do not pay any licensing fees."

"There is a free and paid version of this solution. I am currently using the free version."

"The solution has a pilot feature that is expensive. The overall price of the solution can be cheaper."

"It would be nice if it is cheaper."

More TeamViewer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

University

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Transportation Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	194
Midsize Enterprise	61
Large Enterprise	185

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?

The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By f...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for TeamViewer Business are relatively very competitive and cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer?

I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive. Virus scann...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Parallels Access

Compared 17% of the time

N-able Take Control vs Parallels Access

Compared 14% of the time

Splashtop Remote Support vs Parallels Access

Compared 12% of the time

MSP360 Connect vs Parallels Access

Compared 10% of the time

ScreenConnect vs Parallels Access

Compared 9% of the time

More Parallels Access Competitors

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs TeamViewer

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer

Compared 5% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs TeamViewer

Compared 4% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs TeamViewer

Compared 4% of the time

LogMeIn Pro vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

More TeamViewer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

June 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

June 2026

Download Parallels Access product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer

June 2026

Download TeamViewer product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

TeamViewer Tensor

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Parallels Access is a fast and reliable remote access software, enabling users to connect to computers from anywhere. It streamlines operations by allowing access to applications, files, and multiple computers seamlessly.

Parallels Access provides a stable, user-friendly platform with superior desktop and mobile capabilities. Designed for both small and large businesses, it emphasizes ease of use and secure remote access, enhancing user independence, particularly for those with physical limitations. However, it faces challenges including scalability issues for enterprises and aggressive pricing. Reporting and compatibility particularly with Linux and Unix servers need enhancement, alongside integration issues like the copy-and-paste function between iPads and computers.

What are the key features of Parallels Access?

Remote Deployment: Facilitates easy setup for businesses.
Scalability: Supports small to large business needs.
User Independence: Assists users with physical limitations through enhanced control.
Mobile Publishing: Offers superior capabilities for mobile users.
Secure Platform: Ensures high-level security for remote operations.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Offers flexibility by controlling computers via iPads.
Centralized Management: Saves hardware resources.
Application Publishing: Allows independent application deployment.
Use Case Flexibility: Supports CAD and ERP applications.

Entities integrate Parallels Access into their services for remote application access, focusing on efficiency through centralized management. It supports industries such as engineering and education with Virtual Desktop Infrastructure solutions, enabling flexibility and enhancing operational efficiency. Companies work alongside system integrators and channel partners to tailor offerings to customer needs.

Parallels

TeamViewer offers a license type mainly for small teams, focusing on remote connectivity solutions. It includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, catering to both small businesses and large enterprises with specialized needs.

TeamViewer Business isn't standalone but a primary license for small teams. Its remote connectivity suite includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, the latter offering enhanced features for enterprises. It enables secure, high-speed remote access, collaboration, and troubleshooting. Major users suggest aligning product descriptions and improvement in interfaces and user experiences.

What are the key features of TeamViewer?

High-speed and secure remote access: Fast connections with strong security measures.
Robust collaboration tools: Enhances team productivity remotely.
Screen sharing: Easy display sharing for presentations and meetings.
Session recording: Documentation and review of remote sessions.
Easy integration: Seamless compatibility with other platforms and tools.

What benefits do users highlight?

Improved workflow: Streamlines processes and reduces downtime.
Efficient troubleshooting: Quick resolutions to technical issues.
Compliance assurance: Meets necessary security standards and regulations.
Time and resource savings: Minimizes the need for physical presence and travel.

Organizations use TeamViewer for remote desktop connectivity to manage and solve IT issues. It allows technical support, collaboration, and training with real-time assistance and secure access. By enabling remote support for employees and customers, it ensures efficient issue resolution across industries, such as healthcare, finance, and education.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Gilt Groupe K.K.

Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross

Buyer's Guide

Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Free Report: Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer

Find out what your peers are saying about Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.