ScienceLogic vs StableNet comparison

ScienceLogic and Infosim are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ScienceLogic is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.7, while Infosim is ranked #91. ScienceLogic holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Infosim’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Infosim users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,918 Views
2,557 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

StableNet

Read 3 StableNet reviews

704 Views
690 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

StableNet

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and StableNet compete in the IT management domain. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand in AI and ease of deployment, while StableNet excels in network management and scalability.

Features: ScienceLogic's features include dynamic monitoring, AI-driven insights for real-time analytics, and proactive issue resolution. StableNet offers end-to-end network management, extensive visibility across IT infrastructure, and superior scalability.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve in network management capabilities, scalability for larger networks, and customization options. StableNet may enhance its AI capabilities, integration with third-party tools, and user interface for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a cloud-based deployment model that simplifies setup with efficient customer service. StableNet offers adaptable on-premise or hybrid deployment with extensive configuration options and reliable support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic has a mid-range setup cost with quick ROI through automated analytics, making it cost-effective for operational scale. StableNet's pricing is on the premium side, with higher ROI over time through customized scalability and extensive network capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. StableNet Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. StableNet

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (16th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (13th), AIOps (9th)

StableNet

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

91st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StableNet is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.3%
StableNet	0.3%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

ShahzadAziz

Director of Development/Project Manager at Enablers Private Limited

A highly scalable and stable solution that provides excellent features and can be integrated with any product

The support team is more into R&D. They're not focused on support. The vendor lets the partners provide support for the solution. Partners must have StableNet-certified engineers. Complex problems arise for complex installations. When a problem is deep, it takes a lot of time to resolve it. It goes to the R&D and development teams. They do solve it, but the time taken could be reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration of ScienceLogic with our existing IT ecosystems has significantly benefited our organization, as all alerts now directly go to IBM Netcool and then to the ITSM tool, ServiceNow."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"The power flow is great."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"Power packs."

More ScienceLogic pros

"The best features are the reporting, utilization, and network graph."

"The solution is stable."

"We can integrate any tool with StableNet."

Cons

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"They need a little more self-service."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

More ScienceLogic cons

"The solution is expensive."

"The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement."

"The existing dashboard capability is there, but it is not user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Government

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my opinion Infosim, StableNet Enterprise is the best as it is a third-generation highly automated network management system. It enables IT departments to unify the management requirements of the...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs StableNet

Compared 51% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs StableNet

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs StableNet

Compared 24% of the time

More StableNet Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

January 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download StableNet product report

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

StableNet provides Fault, Performance, Configuration, and Services Management on a single platform.
It is a vendor agnostic solution, built upon a single, consistent code base. The solution is easy to integrate and provides high performance while keeping low hardware requirements.

The unified network & services management approach has been proven with a large number of installations in key industry sectors like energy, finance, manufacturing, retail, telecommunications, and many more.

With this all-in-one NMS approach, Infosim revolutionizes the management of large heterogeneous network infrastructures.

Infosim

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Athenahealth, Barratt, Nocsult, Nucleus Connect, SCC

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. StableNet

February 2026

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. StableNet

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. StableNet and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. StableNet report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.