Trellix Network Detection and Response vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] comparison

The compared Trellix and WatchGuard solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #13 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 3.8% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

3,130 Views
1,628 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Read 34 WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and WatchGuard XTM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 890,027 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Network Detection a...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (9th)

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Jose Vargas

Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring

The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.

Read full review

Generalm4545

General Manager- IT & Automation - Serum at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Protects from attack software and hacking but it doesn't provide the reports in a readable format

In my opinion, image clarity is very important, because I don't get the proper image product on reports. This means that functionality is not there. My engineer does not know how he can replace an order. We attach a log after any kind of keys using a utility instead. For the internet policies that we are implementing, the policy should be based on proper protocols. We use the default policies and there are a number of third-party protocols that appear here. Management with WatchGuard XTM means that out of policy is the problem from our side. In this way, we can not do effective services for people with this one. The policy definition with WatchGuard XTM is not proper for all use case requirements. I've got weekly business reports that I am expecting attachments with from WatchGuard XTM that display data for all kinds of consideration which should be required. Main User Functionality Level Order must adhere to using the admin functionality on the registry, or else our users publish their own name. Maybe these recommendations are irrelevant, but I say that the issue to improve most with WatchGuard XTM is the Main User Function.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Support is very helpful and responsive."

"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."

"The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money."

"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our meantime in being able to identify and detect malicious threats."

"The POC quickly revealed areas for improvement and potential threats that the traditional defenses had utterly missed."

"Trellix NDR provides an essential defense by automatically responding to network incidents that firewalls may not catch."

"Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us."

"Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

"I like the HostWatch because I can see what traffic uses the most bandwidth and I can block that site."

"Reputation Enabled Defense indicates that some websites are so infested that it's not even worth visiting them, and therefore saving the bandwidth of going through the detection process."

"Packet filters and proxy policies are valuable features, as they allow you to configure restrictions by domain name and are useful to block web pages that have multiple IP addresses, such as Facebook."

"For the current network demand, I think the product is worth buying as it is not too expensive and it has almost all the features that I need."

"VPN tunnel creation in WSM is very easy to set up BOVPN tunnel between two sites by dragging and playing."

"This product helped facilitate and protect our environment from the inside out, with features like DLP (data loss prevention) to content filtering all the way to port filtering and traffic shaping."

"The web filtering is a good feature."

"A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."

More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] pros

Cons

"The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this."

"It is very expensive, the price could be better."

"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto."

"Technical packaging could be improved."

"The support from FireEye Network Security is not very good."

"A lot of false positives."

"Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone."

"Customer service and technical support could use some enhancement. On a scale from 1 to 10, it is between six and seven."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

"We had some problems of instability with older versions of the software."

"Our device was not functioning properly, so we returned the product and as a result, our business was down for two days."

"Licensing should be improved."

"I would like them to improve the product's overall protections. This would be good for all product users."

"The WatchGuard gateway wireless functionality for managing access points leaves much to be desired."

"It's a fine product, but some features like the max bandwidth don't work well. Also, the VPN errors are not helpful when troubleshooting."

"The initial setup is neither simple nor complex. If you know the base in networking and how the firewall works, you will be able to figure it out."

"I’m not in favor having to setup security proxy settings instead of just turning them on like you do with the SonicWALL enhanced OS."

More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"The pricing is a little high."

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

"The licensing and renewal is very expensive."

"Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."

"Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative."

"It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,027 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

Ixia ThreatARMOR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Cisco Secure Firewall vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Sophos UTM vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

March 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

March 2026

Download WatchGuard XTM [EOL] product report

Also Known As

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

No data available

Overview

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection, but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

AVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

890,027 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.