Trellix Network Detection and Response vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] comparison

The compared Trellix and WatchGuard solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #13 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 3.8% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

3,130 Views
1,628 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Read 34 WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and WatchGuard XTM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,576 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Network Detection a...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (9th)

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Jose Vargas

Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring

The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.

Read full review

Generalm4545

General Manager- IT & Automation - Serum at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Protects from attack software and hacking but it doesn't provide the reports in a readable format

In my opinion, image clarity is very important, because I don't get the proper image product on reports. This means that functionality is not there. My engineer does not know how he can replace an order. We attach a log after any kind of keys using a utility instead. For the internet policies that we are implementing, the policy should be based on proper protocols. We use the default policies and there are a number of third-party protocols that appear here. Management with WatchGuard XTM means that out of policy is the problem from our side. In this way, we can not do effective services for people with this one. The policy definition with WatchGuard XTM is not proper for all use case requirements. I've got weekly business reports that I am expecting attachments with from WatchGuard XTM that display data for all kinds of consideration which should be required. Main User Functionality Level Order must adhere to using the admin functionality on the registry, or else our users publish their own name. Maybe these recommendations are irrelevant, but I say that the issue to improve most with WatchGuard XTM is the Main User Function.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has provided us with better malware, intrusion and incident detection."

"The feature that I find most valuable is the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."

"Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."

"Support is very helpful and responsive."

"The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."

"The most valuable feature is the view into the application."

"We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up."

"The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate, saving time, trouble, and money."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

"VPN tunnel creation in WSM is very easy to set up BOVPN tunnel between two sites by dragging and playing."

"Simply, give this tool a try; it will generate great benefits in terms of the scalability and environment."

"We have used technical support for WatchGuard many times and overall, we are satisfied with it. They are always listening and there is a good reaction time to our findings. When there are issues, they really try to resolve them."

"The most valuable features of the WatchGuard product line that we appreciate and leverage the most is the UTM security suite."

"This product is solid and has a great reputation behind it."

"WatchGuard XTM is fairly basic. We use it as the perimeter firewall. The main point is to protect from attack software and hacking."

"It is stable and does not require you to reboot all the time."

"We use WatchGuard XTM as a privileged access management solution; I complained about another unstable product and we switched to WatchGuard, which has been good."

More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] pros

Cons

"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."

"On a scale of one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best, I would you rate this product an 8. From a security perspective, it's pretty decent. It's just that I have seen it miss some semi loads or triggers when it's integrated with other products."

"It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."

"The pricing is not reasonable. The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"FireEye’s main feature is its sandboxing or threat emulation capabilities to detect malware with extra add-ons such as signature-based IPS or endpoint protection, but these features are lacking compared to most IPS or endpoint vendors."

"Technical packaging could be improved."

"The support is somewhat lacking with long response times."

"I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

"The support is poor and lazy."

"Sometimes the local firebox management tool is flaky."

"Sometimes we have had issues with stability of the product."

"Tech support is sometimes a little bit slow."

"I would like them to improve the product's overall protections."

"One huge issue with WatchGuard XTM is that I'm not getting reports in a readable format."

"I think the anti-Spam feature, and the real time log to inspect the bandwidth users both need improving."

"The technical support is very bad. The price is very high, the response time is very long, and technical support does not provide a general solution."

More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an expensive solution."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."

"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

"Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative."

"Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."

"It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."

"The licensing and renewal is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

Ixia ThreatARMOR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 30% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Sophos UTM vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

March 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard XTM [EOL]

March 2026

Download WatchGuard XTM [EOL] product report

Also Known As

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

No data available

Overview

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection, but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

AVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.