No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] comparison

The compared Trellix and WatchGuard solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #17 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 4.1% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 45 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 3,756 Views
  • 2,028 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
Read 34 WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and WatchGuard XTM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: May 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    May 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 895,272 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Trellix Network Detection a...
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.1
    Number of Reviews
    45
    Ranking in other categories
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (17th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (13th)
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Number of Reviews
    34
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Hassan Sheikh - PeerSpot reviewer
    Hassan Sheikh
    Network & Security Lead at Net-International
    Integrated sensors have improved traffic inspection and now provide resilient east-west threat control
    I believe Trellix Network Detection and Response can be improved by integrating machine learning into its detection response capabilities. Additionally, incorporating failover kits integrated into the sensors could be beneficial. It would be best if Trellix Network Detection and Response sensors were converted into a next-generation firewall with built-in capabilities for routing, switching, and Layer 7 functionality, as most next-generation firewalls today include these features. While Trellix Network Detection and Response sensors are highly capable, I think it would be advantageous to include features such as Layer 7 profiles, application profile filters, web filters, IDx, IP feature sets, signature detection features, and routing and switching capabilities all in one device. While the user interface of Trellix Network Detection and Response is very good, I suggest implementing a customizable dashboard. Additionally, there should be report generation for critical attacks and high alert severities, displayed graphically on the dashboard, and providing options to extract files in Excel format for better visibility.
    Read full review
    Generalm4545 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Generalm4545
    General Manager- IT & Automation - Serum at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Protects from attack software and hacking but it doesn't provide the reports in a readable format
    In my opinion, image clarity is very important, because I don't get the proper image product on reports. This means that functionality is not there. My engineer does not know how he can replace an order. We attach a log after any kind of keys using a utility instead. For the internet policies that we are implementing, the policy should be based on proper protocols. We use the default policies and there are a number of third-party protocols that appear here. Management with WatchGuard XTM means that out of policy is the problem from our side. In this way, we can not do effective services for people with this one. The policy definition with WatchGuard XTM is not proper for all use case requirements. I've got weekly business reports that I am expecting attachments with from WatchGuard XTM that display data for all kinds of consideration which should be required. Main User Functionality Level Order must adhere to using the admin functionality on the registry, or else our users publish their own name. Maybe these recommendations are irrelevant, but I say that the issue to improve most with WatchGuard XTM is the Main User Function.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."
    "Very functional and good for detecting malicious traffic."
    "The product is very easy to configure."
    "After all of our testing was conducted we felt confident that this was the right approach to safeguard the bank from advanced malware, zero-day and targeted attacks."
    "Once we had a chance to do our own due diligence, it was clear that there is really nothing else that compares with the FireEye appliance."
    "The best features that Trellix Network Detection and Response offers are visibility, threat detection, and immediate response, which allows us to take action almost instantly while keeping proof through proper data capture and maintaining logs for future analysis to prevent attacks and ensure that we have the right policies and controls."
    "Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us."
    "Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
    "Simply, give this tool a try; it will generate great benefits in terms of the scalability and environment."
    "I like the HostWatch because I can see what traffic uses the most bandwidth and I can block that site."
    "Reputation Enabled Defense indicates that some websites are so infested that it's not even worth visiting them, and therefore saving the bandwidth of going through the detection process."
    "SNMP status monitoring and the Central Management Software."
    "Setup and configuration is straightforward with excellent management interface."
    "WatchGuard XTM2050A has enterprise class performance with the cost of an SMB class device."
    "It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."
    "We switched because WatchGuard offered better value for money without sacrificing security."
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."
    "Technical support could be improved."
    "I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."
    "It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there. A known threat can be coming into the network and we would want the cloud to look up the problem. I would also like to see them develop more file replication and machine learning."
    "Technical support needs improvement as sometimes engineers are not available promptly, especially during high-severity incidents."
    "It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."
    "Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone."
    "It is not a very secure product."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
    "Licensing should be improved."
    "One huge issue with WatchGuard XTM is that I'm not getting reports in a readable format."
    "The setting policies need improvement. It needs an easier way to do static NAT and check on what policy is being used for that specific traffic."
    "Expensive Requires client-server application to use some advanced features"
    "Initially WatchGuard assured us regarding endpoint security, but we are not sure that the product provides endpoint security features to its full extent."
    "One huge issue with WatchGuard XTM is that I'm not getting reports in a readable format. Readable means, I don't want Excel online. We repeat auditing when we trigger the report or setup calendar. That functionality is what we are looking for from WatchGuard XTM here."
    "WatchGuard doesn't have a product that allows them to get into the data center. And that's just because there is no hardware to do the job."
    "Using the SSL VPN remote feature is great, but we additionally needed two-factor authentication, and employed a third-party product."
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
    "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
    "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
    "When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."
    "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
    "It's an expensive solution."
    "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
    "The pricing is a little high."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
    "The licensing and renewal is very expensive."
    "Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."
    "Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.​"
    "It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    895,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    14%
    Comms Service Provider
    12%
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
    Government
    8%
    Marketing Services Firm
    14%
    Financial Services Firm
    14%
    Performing Arts
    13%
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business22
    Midsize Enterprise8
    Large Enterprise21
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business24
    Midsize Enterprise7
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
    I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for FireEye Network Security?
    My main use case for Trellix Network Detection and Response is providing support for our customers, and one of our customers has Trellix, so we had to provide monitoring or specific XDR tools for t...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 6% of the time
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 6% of the time
    Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 4% of the time
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 3% of the time
    Hillstone Cloud Sandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Hillstone Cloud Sandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 3% of the time
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 24% of the time
    Fortinet FortiGate vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 23% of the time
    Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Sophos UTM vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Sophos UTM vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 14% of the time
    Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 10% of the time
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Trellix Network Detection and Response
    April 2026
    Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
    Buyer's Guide
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    April 2026
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reportDownload WatchGuard XTM [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Trellix Network Detection and Response provides robust threat protection with advanced detection of zero-day attacks and APTs. Its user-friendly dashboard and real-time response capabilities enhance security and visibility across networks.

    Trellix Network Detection and Response stands out with its MVX engine, leveraging virtual machines for comprehensive behavioral analysis. The solution supports detection of advanced cyber threats through features like sandboxing and application filtering, offering real-time response and packet capture for detailed contextual insights. Companies benefit from seamless integration with other platforms, enhancing usability and overall protection. User-friendly interfaces improve network visibility, while stability and ease of configuration safeguard against both signature-based and signature-less threats.

    What key features does Trellix offer?
    • Zero-Day Attacks Detection: Identifies and mitigates unknown threats.
    • APTs Detection: Detects advanced persistent threats through sophisticated techniques.
    • MVX Engine: Uses virtual machines for behavioral analysis.
    • Sandboxing: Adds a layer of threat protection.
    • Real-Time Response: Offers immediate threat mitigation and context.
    • User-Friendly Dashboard: Enhances visibility with application filtering.
    What are the benefits of Trellix Network Detection and Response?
    • Enhanced Usability: Integrates easily with other platforms for seamless operations.
    • Detailed Context: Real-time packet capture provides in-depth threat analysis.
    • Comprehensive Threat Protection: Covers both signature-based and signature-less threats.
    • Improved Visibility: Offers clear dashboard analytics for network monitoring.

    Companies in sectors like finance, healthcare, and enterprise security utilize Trellix Network Detection and Response for tasks such as network intrusion detection, endpoint protection, and securing data transmission paths. It aids in threat investigations, pre-sales demos, and network forensics, reducing risks by protecting against cyber threats like phishing.

    Trellix

    Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection, but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.

    WatchGuard
     

    Sample Customers

    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    AVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    May 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: May 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    895,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.