No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] comparison

The compared Trellix and WatchGuard solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #17 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 4.1% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 3,756 Views
  • 2,028 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
Read 34 WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and WatchGuard XTM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: April 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    April 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 892,487 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Trellix Network Detection a...
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.3
    Number of Reviews
    40
    Ranking in other categories
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (17th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (13th)
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Number of Reviews
    34
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Jose Vargas - PeerSpot reviewer
    Jose Vargas
    Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
    Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring
    The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.
    Read full review
    Generalm4545 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Generalm4545
    General Manager- IT & Automation - Serum at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Protects from attack software and hacking but it doesn't provide the reports in a readable format
    In my opinion, image clarity is very important, because I don't get the proper image product on reports. This means that functionality is not there. My engineer does not know how he can replace an order. We attach a log after any kind of keys using a utility instead. For the internet policies that we are implementing, the policy should be based on proper protocols. We use the default policies and there are a number of third-party protocols that appear here. Management with WatchGuard XTM means that out of policy is the problem from our side. In this way, we can not do effective services for people with this one. The policy definition with WatchGuard XTM is not proper for all use case requirements. I've got weekly business reports that I am expecting attachments with from WatchGuard XTM that display data for all kinds of consideration which should be required. Main User Functionality Level Order must adhere to using the admin functionality on the registry, or else our users publish their own name. Maybe these recommendations are irrelevant, but I say that the issue to improve most with WatchGuard XTM is the Main User Function.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "FireEye has placed us in the position to proactively counter malicious threats; we now don’t have to take a user offline in order to rebuild their PC following an attack."
    "Anyone who is looking for a complete network protection solution and does not have any budget issues should definitely go for it."
    "Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."
    "The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."
    "The POC quickly revealed areas for improvement and potential threats that the traditional defenses had utterly missed."
    "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our meantime in being able to identify and detect malicious threats."
    "The most valuable feature is the network security module."
    "It has provided us with better malware, intrusion and incident detection."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
    "This product is solid and has a great reputation behind it."
    "Go for it. It's a great product with many security features and offers great protection for your network."
    "Setup and configuration is straightforward with excellent management interface."
    "After it is installed, you will have plenty of time to do something else, because it is stable and does not require you to reboot all the time."
    "SNMP status monitoring and the Central Management Software."
    "We're really happy with WatchGuard."
    "Flawless. I have had my firebox for 3 years now and never had an issue with it."
    "It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "It is very expensive, the price could be better."
    "The product is pricey. We'd like it to cost less. Not all customers can afford it."
    "Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
    "Stability is fine as long as we don't go deeper into the system. Once we go deeper into the SSM, inspection, and decryption, we get some issues."
    "The pricing is not reasonable. The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
    "As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web)."
    "The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right."
    "Technical packaging could be improved."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
    "Tech support is sometimes a little bit slow."
    "The support is poor and lazy."
    "Now, you need to replace the appliance."
    "I would like them to improve the product's overall protections."
    "In my experience they need to make changes in web filtering access for Skype as that's the time we had problems."
    "We still haven't got the Terminal Service agent to work in our Citrix environment Application Signature also doesn't work well especially in SSL traffic"
    "One huge issue with WatchGuard XTM is that I'm not getting reports in a readable format."
    "Wireless throughput needs to be improved."
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The pricing is a little high."
    "Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
    "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
    "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
    "The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."
    "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
    "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
    "The tool is a bit pricey."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
    "Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."
    "Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.​"
    "It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."
    "The licensing and renewal is very expensive."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    14%
    Comms Service Provider
    11%
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
    Government
    8%
    Marketing Services Firm
    15%
    Financial Services Firm
    15%
    Performing Arts
    13%
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business20
    Midsize Enterprise8
    Large Enterprise19
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business24
    Midsize Enterprise7
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?
    We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
    My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
    I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 6% of the time
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 6% of the time
    Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 4% of the time
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 3% of the time
    Hillstone Cloud Sandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Hillstone Cloud Sandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 3% of the time
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Cisco Secure Firewall vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 28% of the time
    Fortinet FortiGate vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Fortinet FortiGate vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 27% of the time
    Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 17% of the time
    Sophos UTM vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Sophos UTM vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 16% of the time
    Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Logo
    Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Compared 12% of the time
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Trellix Network Detection and Response
    April 2026
    Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
    Buyer's Guide
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    April 2026
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reportDownload WatchGuard XTM [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Trellix Network Detection and Response provides robust threat protection with advanced detection of zero-day attacks and APTs. Its user-friendly dashboard and real-time response capabilities enhance security and visibility across networks.

    Trellix Network Detection and Response stands out with its MVX engine, leveraging virtual machines for comprehensive behavioral analysis. The solution supports detection of advanced cyber threats through features like sandboxing and application filtering, offering real-time response and packet capture for detailed contextual insights. Companies benefit from seamless integration with other platforms, enhancing usability and overall protection. User-friendly interfaces improve network visibility, while stability and ease of configuration safeguard against both signature-based and signature-less threats.

    What key features does Trellix offer?
    • Zero-Day Attacks Detection: Identifies and mitigates unknown threats.
    • APTs Detection: Detects advanced persistent threats through sophisticated techniques.
    • MVX Engine: Uses virtual machines for behavioral analysis.
    • Sandboxing: Adds a layer of threat protection.
    • Real-Time Response: Offers immediate threat mitigation and context.
    • User-Friendly Dashboard: Enhances visibility with application filtering.
    What are the benefits of Trellix Network Detection and Response?
    • Enhanced Usability: Integrates easily with other platforms for seamless operations.
    • Detailed Context: Real-time packet capture provides in-depth threat analysis.
    • Comprehensive Threat Protection: Covers both signature-based and signature-less threats.
    • Improved Visibility: Offers clear dashboard analytics for network monitoring.

    Companies in sectors like finance, healthcare, and enterprise security utilize Trellix Network Detection and Response for tasks such as network intrusion detection, endpoint protection, and securing data transmission paths. It aids in threat investigations, pre-sales demos, and network forensics, reducing risks by protecting against cyber threats like phishing.

    Trellix

    Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection, but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.

    WatchGuard
     

    Sample Customers

    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    AVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    April 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: April 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    892,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.