Trellix Network Detection and Response vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] comparison

"The product is very easy to configure."

"The solution can scale."

"Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall, and if you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly."

"It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye."

"We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up."

"Once we had a chance to do our own due diligence, it was clear that there is really nothing else that compares with the FireEye appliance."

"Very functional and good for detecting malicious traffic."

"The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design."

"Packet filters and proxy policies are valuable features, as they allow you to configure restrictions by domain name and are useful to block web pages that have multiple IP addresses, such as Facebook."

"We're really happy with WatchGuard."

"Lots of enterprise-grade features in SMB firewall Cost-price performance is at its best"

"A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."

"We have used technical support for WatchGuard many times and overall, we are satisfied with it. They are always listening and there is a good reaction time to our findings. When there are issues, they really try to resolve them."

"SNMP status monitoring and the Central Management Software."

"It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."

"I like the HostWatch because I can see what traffic uses the most bandwidth and I can block that site."

"The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless."

"The pricing is not reasonable. The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."

"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."

"As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web)."

"Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."

"I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."

"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment."

"Initially WatchGuard assured us regarding endpoint security, but we are not sure that the product provides endpoint security features to its full extent."

"Sometimes the local firebox management tool is flaky."

"I think the anti-Spam feature, and the real time log to inspect the bandwidth users both need improving."

"Expensive Requires client-server application to use some advanced features"

"The WatchGuard gateway wireless functionality for managing access points leaves much to be desired."

"I feel that paying a yearly maintenance fee for firmware updates is not worth it in my opinion."

"The problem is the high cost."

"VPN tunnel lost packet."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."

"The tool is a bit pricey."

"It's an expensive solution."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.​"

"It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."

"Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."

"The licensing and renewal is very expensive."