The primary use case is for software development teams to manage their work.
The most valuable features of this solution are workflow and reporting.
The team construct could be simplified. We use Jira with Tempo Planner, and Portfolio for Jira, and at times it is not always clear. With Portfolio, it's the same as Jira but with Tempo, it clashes. It's not a seamless transaction.
We would like to see integration between Tempo and Jira. For example, if I create a team in Tempo, I would like to be able to use it and re-use it Jira as well.
In Tempo, if you create a team then you are able to link that to a project in Jira. I would like to have that same capability, where I can link to Portfolio for Jira. Specifically, if I create a team in Tempo then I want it available in Portfolio. When I am planning the work for my team, it would be easier to have that capability available.
I have been using Jira for approximately four years.
It's a stable solution and we have not had any issues.
Jira is scalable.
We have more than 13,000 users and we have not experienced any issues with the performance or scalability. We are able to scale pretty well.
I work with Jira on a daily basis, as well as offer support to users and guide them into making the best use of it.
We have a relationship with Atlassian. I have not personally had to contact technical support, but I do know that we have a technical account manager to whom we report any issues.
My advice for anybody who is implementing Jira is that it easy to use but you want to understand what your requirements are. You want to know what you want to use it for, and what you want to achieve by using it.
With Jira, you get what you input, in terms of your data. For me, I get what I need out of it.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.