Microsoft Intune Reviews

We are rolling out the product to manage cloud-based devices. We heavily use it for iOS and Windows devices.

Microsoft Intune improves our organization’s response time. We are supporting an older population of users. It is a key advantage to be able to support users who lock devices quite frequently.

The product’s biggest advantage is its ability to unlock a large number of devices remotely. It supports end-users who tend to lock their devices quite frequently. Its conditional access policy helps us keep the users logged in to their devices.

Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance. The devices fall out of compliance a little too easily. If the users don't check in within a certain amount of time, they become non-compliant, even after having up-to-date standard settings.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for three years, personally. Our organization was using it for one or two years before I joined.

I haven’t encountered any stability issues for the product.

Microsoft Intune supports over 10,000 devices for our customers, primarily using iOS and Windows. We have a large number of managed apps in the aerospace industry. We were able to transfer apps to our devices managing app licensing through Intune.  I rate the product’s scalability a nine out of ten.

The technical support services are pretty decent.

Positive

I can see a good return on investment in terms of the areas it can automate to summarize day-to-day tasks, making them less time-intensive.

Intune has helped us greatly by rolling out conditional access policies with the RBAC settings. It helps us create a security posture for devices.

The product is critical for our organization to keep devices safe. We have a large number of around 300-400 IT executives. It is crucial to be able to limit any one user or group of users within the IT field from a zero-trust standpoint.

In the time aspect, the product helps users get the right tools whenever required. It saves a couple of work hours per month by letting the right IT executives know how to access the devices.

We heavily use iOS space with iPads. I advise others to decide to buy the product depending on the operating systems their environment supports. They should make sure it is the right product for their devices. 

I rate Microsoft Intune an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for auto-enrollment with app EPP and application deployment with EPP.

We're currently testing the possibility of using the solution as a new MDM tool for mobile applications.

All regions and departments operate on the same model; we turn on the device, select if it's personal or corporate, and all the products and profiles are loaded onto it.

The solution hasn't improved our organization yet, as we're still in the testing phase and have yet to go into full production.

The ability to switch between Affinity and non-Affinity enrollment is great. 

The wiping features are very good. 

The capacity to create more profiles and switch between corporate and personal devices are beneficial features.

One of the main advantages of Intune is that it's a Microsoft product, so it integrates with the other MS products we use.

The solution needs to be better for managing laptops; many functions are still unavailable in this regard.

The scalability could be improved, and like most other MDM products, Intune is good but not 100% there yet.

We've been using the solution for a couple of years. 

The stability is good, and there has been a lot of progress since I last used the solution.

The solution is working well for the most part, but some improvements could be made to the scalability. 

I never had to contact technical support. 

I previously used MobileIron UEM and VMware Workspace ONE.

I wasn't involved in the initial deployment. Now that it's set up, deployment to devices requires turning the phone on, and the device will automatically pull up the profile if the client is linked to our Apple Business Manager tool. We currently have one staff member involved with the maintenance, but we're looking into distributing it to others on the same team.  

The pricing for Intune and the competitor products are all within the same range, there is no true advantage when it comes to cost. 

I evaluated MobileIron and VMware. 

I rate the solution seven out of ten. 

We have yet to reach a level where we can notice flaws or identify areas for improvement since we're still checking and have yet to run the solution through a capability list.

My advice to others evaluating Intune is that it's the best solution for mobile devices like Androids and iPhones. However, if you're rolling out physical laptops, I recommend using a second tool, as there are still many unavailable options on the Intune app for laptops.  

We use it for the rollout of Windows and Apple devices to our users.

Its direct integration with all the other products that we have from Microsoft is valuable. We're using the E5 license, and we have a whole wealth of different products available. It just makes it easier to have everything from one provider. 

One big problem with Microsoft is that they're changing the names of the products quite often, or they're quite consistently doing so. Intune is now Endpoint administration. Constantly switching the user interface or the administrative interface makes it quite hard to keep pace. If you are on a two-week holiday and you come back and look at the same screen you have looked at for the last couple of months, it looks different, which is annoying. Changing things around all the time doesn't make it easy.

There are some elements where the integration isn't finalized. So, for some of the things, you use the user interface, meaning the administrative website, and for some of the things, you have to use PowerShell to make changes, and it's not quite clear why you have to do things at one point this way and at the other point that way. If they could improve that a little bit more, it would be a good thing.

Other than that, functionality-wise, it, more or less, serves our purpose. I'm not really sure what I would wish more at the moment.

I have been using this solution for over a year.

It is stable 99% of the time. There are some problems with Microsoft in terms of outages, but overall, the solution is very stable.

It is very easy to scale. It is basically adding additional licenses. It requires adding additional domain names and things like that and maybe adjusting a couple of security groups, but other than that, it's really easy to scale up or down.

We have only 120 users in 44 companies. A few of them have financial, accounting, or legal backgrounds. We are not an engineering company; we are a service company. We are a shared service center catering to the needs of more than 44 other companies. That's our business. We are a managed service provider to all these companies.

Its documentation is quite okay, and if not, if you Google things, you would find almost everything. 

We had four, five issues over the last year, and we had to contact them. They were actually quite swift at solving problems. So, overall, we are happy.

It was easier than expected. We did the full deployment for 44 companies and about 120 users in about three months.

ROI is very high at the end. We were using a full data center before with three racks built up with about 30 host systems and 220 virtual servers that we operate in, and by just switching to Microsoft 365, we could get rid of all of them. It made our life easier in terms of support and maintenance. We have saved the costs for all the hardware that we had and all the hassle that we had when parts were broken.

If you ask the accountant or the finance department, they'll tell you that it is way too expensive, but when I look at the cost and compare it with the value you actually get, it's more than fair.

We looked at the Sophos solution as well. We are a Sophos partner, but it was easier to deal directly with the Microsoft solution primarily because of the rules management and the Microsoft groups and the security groups that we use. We use rule-based access, and we have access packages so that users can elevate their rights with an approval process in the back.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

Our use case is relatively typical; we primarily use the product for managing Windows laptops, pushing policies, and some configurations. 

The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies.

The reporting could be improved, as it's pretty poor compared to other products of this type. 

Patching needs improvement, as it hasn't been working well recently. 

We've been using the solution for over two years. 

The solution is very stable. 

The scalability is there, and it's automatically based on the number of users in the back end, so we don't even need to think about it.

The tech support is excellent, and I give them a nine out of ten.

Positive

At my old organization, we used Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM), which is more of an on-prem system. Microsoft seems to have recognized that everyone is moving to the cloud, and I expect they will bring SCCM's capabilities onto Intune as a kind of product upgrade.

SCCM is a more versatile tool than Intune; we can't patch third-party applications in the latter, which is a significant headache.

The deployment was pretty straightforward; the solution came in a prebuilt configuration, and we just needed to enable it in our Azure domain.

As the product is cloud-based, we don't have to do any maintenance as a customer. 

Intune is available as an individual product, but it also comes with Office 365 Premium or an Enterprise license, and the price varies for each version. 

I rate the solution eight out of ten. 

Those considering the solution should look into it because it may already be part of your license or available with a small upgrade. Once upgraded, you have a tool and don't need to bring in another one. The deployment is simple, there is no other third party and no agents to be deployed. You also have a dedicated console that provides visibility and management, which is very easy to handle.

We primarily use the solution for device management. 

There are a lot of use cases, however, the base is the mobile security for our corporate devices and deployment of applications. We are a worldwide organization and in many countries. There are also country-based use cases, or areas that incorporate these use cases for some specific business units such as healthcare and similar SAP solutions. We have a lot of small areas where we use this, however, the main driver is improving the security of the devices and providing some automation configuration for the users including VPN solutions and corporate WiFi connections, applications, et cetera.

If I compared this product to XenMobile, except the conditional access, which was also partially possible to integrate with Citrix XenMobile, then there is not much difference between the two. The functionality s very good. However, the main way this has improved our organization is that there is support for conditional access and native integration with Office 365 services which we migrated to. 

The integration with conditional access is great. That's maybe the most important aspect of the solution.

The pricing is very good.

We already use a lot of Microsoft products in our company, and therefore, it made sense to also use this product.

For the most part, the solution is stable.

As a cloud solution, the scalability on offer is great.

There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations.

We would like, for example, integrated remote control or a remote session tool or something like this. You must have TeamViewer and the integration with this is limited and it's extra money. Nothing is built-in. Some functionalities are really limited to fully managed devices and so on. It took a long time for them to integrate the big ECS infrastructure into the corporate devices. This is now done, however, it took a longer time than expected.

Technical support could be h=better.

We've used the solution for the last three years, starting with the integration. 

The solution is pretty stable. As it is in the cloud, there are not many issues in terms of a service outage or things like this. Maybe when there are new patches integrated every month, which sometimes happens, some functionality may be influenced or affected. It's more or less a small issue, however, issues are possible. I don't recall a situation where downtime happened or users were really affected, however. It's just an occasional issue we may have with a patch that we would need to address.

The solution is quite scalable. As a cloud product, there are no issues surrounding expanding if you need to. 

We have maybe 27,000 people using the solution at this time. There is a plan to have all mobile users in this solution, so we are talking about 70,000 users at some point. However, it's a question also of the licenses, as you have to have a license for that product.

Technical support is hit and miss. Sometimes it's really good and other times it's not so great.

We used Citrix Endpoint Management in the past. We used it about two years ago. It was a good product. They are comparable, really, Citrix and Microsoft. 

I was not involved from the beginning of the project. However, from what I remember, we did the implementation directly with the help of a support engineer from Microsoft. Their involvement ensured the setup was not such a big deal.

Deployment took maybe one year in our environment, however, this was because we had a lot of time to tune it up and to test it, to have a pilot for a few months and then add more people to the pilot before we started migrations for mobile, for example. We took our time to really prepare the product as best as possible and then deployed it to the users and migrated them over.

We have two levels of people at a global level that handle deployment and maintenance. They mostly focus on improving the environment, not troubleshooting WiFi issues. 

We had direct assistance from Microsoft. Their assistance made the process seamless and it was a positive experience.

The solution offers reasonable pricing.

It's my understanding that we have the licensing set up for monthly payments, however, it's not an aspect of the solution I'm directly involved with. I don't know enough about it.

That said, I am aware that, in order to have mobile involved, you need the EMS solution or EMS license, and that's an extra cost to the standard Office license.

We're just a customer and an end-user.

As we are on the cloud version of the solution, we are more or less on the latest version of the solution.

The product was chosen for political reasons, as the company is mostly using Microsoft products and also the prices were maybe better than other options. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. If they are already using Microsoft or 365, it's a good product for companies sot have. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

I'm a senior information security analyst and a customer of Intune. 

Before having Intune, we didn't have the capability to have computers wiped. I couldn't manage the operating system from a central location and wasn't able to deploy policies and verify software updates. It's helped with software update needs, operating system version update needs, and security policy enforcement.

The support is excellent for this solution and the configurations are a good feature. 

There are some enrollment features that could be improved, possibly some other tools that do almost the same job with alternative ways to enroll the device. Intune doesn't have those features. Additionally, I think they could try to invest more on macOS devices making it more manageable, and making the management more accurate. A solution like Jamf, for example, gives you the greatest capability - more capability on management, on policy enforcement, wiping devices, locking devices, and many other things. This is the main reason I'm not using Intune for all the contractors now and the reason we're planning to have Jamf implemented at the beginning of 2021.

If they could improve the support on the macOS devices, it would be great. Then we wouldn't need to buy Jamf. I'm not sure it's possible because of the relationship the enterprise has with Apple, but if they could improve the macOS management, that would be great. 

I've been using this solution for about two years. 

The solution is very stable, we don't have any problems with the platform itself. We had a problem a few weeks ago with the whole Azure provider system which affected not only Intune, but most Microsoft services. This was the biggest problem I've had with Intune, no problems with the platform or instabilities.

I'm not able to scale because of the issues with macOS management. We really have some needs here that Jamf Pro covers more efficiently than Intune does. We are trying to work it to have Intune on Mac systems, but we need to install something extra to make that work. We were looking for a more transparent tool in order to get this enrollment done by a central console, and not have to install other tools on the computers. Jamf does that, so we essentially don't need to install any kind of tool. You just need to enroll your device using a URL and it's done. Scalability in relation to the entire Windows or Android or iPhone environments can be done without a problem. We have around 2000 computers. In my previous job we had 55,000 PCs, and they were all Windows.

We had four analysts working on implementation and we now have two people dealing with day-to-day maintenance. For now, we won't continue installing Intune on macOS. We'll just keep them on Windows, Android, and iPhone and we'll go through the macOS with Jamf Pro.

With Microsoft, everything is on the community and easily accessible. Jamf Pro also provides a very, very, good support team. They have engineers, and depending on the support you buy or the support agreement you make with them, you can have a personal engineer working with you 24/7. Both tools have very good support teams.

It's really simple to implement Intune. Everything is already deployed on the cloud and you get everything you need. If you have a Windows 10, you can perform this connection from the Windows control panel and it's quite easy. We are now working to get the Android and iOS cell phones enrolled as well. We are on a pilot right now for macOS. Computers running macOS are already in a pilot period. We're just verifying that everything works well. We're also proceeding with the implementation for the macOS computers as well. Deployment took one or two weeks and I did it myself. 

In Brazil, we need a partner to get a license. The partner communicates with Microsoft and provides us with the license. We have a monthly contract which is paid annually and we have a three-year contract with Intune. 

If you have a complete Windows workstation environment, Intune is fine. But if you have a mixed environment like I do, running Windows and Mac, Jamf Pro is the best tool to manage an Apple environment. The reason we chose Jamf is because it integrates to Intune. In a single panel you can have all the inventory you need, either from Mac computers or Windows computers, because they send the information to the Intune platform. This was the main reason we chose Jamf.

I would rate this solution a nine out of 10. 

We are replacing AirWatch MDM with the product so that we can manage our devices. Eventually, we plan to migrate from SCCM, Windows, and Mac to the Microsoft Intune environment. It will help different departments to manage devices from one place. 

Microsoft Intune helps us lock and open iPads easily. 

The tool's most valuable feature is Autopilot. 

I have a lot of Apple products in my environment. It would be nice to have an improved integration of Apple products with Microsoft Intune without Jam. 

I have been working with the product for a year. 

Microsoft Intune's stability and uptime are good. 

Microsoft Intune has a lot of documentation. Its support is also good. 

Positive

We used AirWatch before Microsoft Intune. We switched because of cost and customer care issues. We are currently in an SCCM environment. 

The solution's deployment is both complex and intuitive. 

Microsoft Intune's pricing is reasonable. 

We chose the product because it was cost-effective and easy to integrate with our system. 

We are working with a Microsoft partner to improve our environment's security. It helps us condense our profile into one instead of three. 

We expect time and money savings in the long run since it is a cost-effective solution. We are Microsoft partners. It integrates everything into one platform, which helps us save time since we don't have to jump from one platform to another. 

I rate the product a seven. It is a good product with good capabilities. It is a solid solution that is easy to work with. 

We use Intune as an educational platform. My company has about 85 users and 10 admins at one location. 

Intune saves us time and money because we buy less equipment. We can wipe our devices and reuse them on different jobs instead of buying new ones. 

Intune enables us to manage our devices from anywhere. 

Intune has limited integration with non-Microsoft solutions. It isn't suitable for iOS devices—only Windows and Android. I would also like to see improved synchronization and replication with Azure Active Directory in hybrid environments.

I have used Intune for one year. 

Intune is stable.

Intune is scalable.

I rate Microsoft's support an eight out of ten. The recommendations from the community forums are usually enough. I contact Microsoft's support when I have a significant issue. They're helpful and provide the information I need.

Positive

We also do business with Amazon, Google, and other cloud providers. 

Intune was easy to set up. Everything goes quickly once you have all the documentation. It isn't that complicated and took about four or five days in our test environment. We had to synchronize the users with the cloud environment. Once all the identities are replicated in the cloud, we started to duplicate the groups and endpoints. After this was finished, we cut the links to the on-premise installation.

We have seen a return on investment. We pay about $10,000 annually for 85 users. We save a lot on maintenance and monitoring. 

Intune's pricing model is appropriate. 

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.