Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
IT Solutions Analyst at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Defect Management is a feature allows us to track the defect status for our projects

What is most valuable?

Defect Management: This feature allows us to track the defect status for our project, send the notification to the user via email and all the details about the defects can be maintained for the future reference as knowledge center.

Graphs and Dashboard: This is one of the top features, by which we can track the status of the project with ease to keep track of project management and executive reporting.

The live graphs can be exported via public URL's and can be integrated with SharePoint and others as required.

How has it helped my organization?

More collaborative, ease of work, and better documentation of all project activities.

What needs improvement?

Certainly on the UI part, it has to be improved to make it user-friendly and more presentable.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than three years.

Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about OpenText ALM / Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues with scalability.

How are customer service and support?

Technical Support is great and always responsive to solve the issues.

How was the initial setup?

Nope, the architecture is simple to implement and scale.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price is a bit high.

What other advice do I have?

Go ahead with this tool. It is for the project management and test execution.

Do consult a few of the other folks using this tool to understand the tricks.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Principle consultant at Active Data Consulting Services Pty Ltd
Real User
Top 20
Being able to quickly and easily compile executables on Multiple Platforms.

What is most valuable?

Being able to quickly and easily compile executables on multiple platforms.

How has it helped my organization?

Just over 10 years ago, our organization joined the Australian Bill payment scheme, part of the technical requirements involve having to build a COBOL interface to their rules validation program. So we needed to source a COBOL development environment which would allow us to quickly develop and deploy a COBOL interface.

What needs improvement?

None that I can think of from my experience, MicroFocus COBOL does everything we need it to do.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than 10 years

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No, we found the support staff at MicroFocus in Australia to be highly knowledgeable and very much of assistance in helping us get our products setup and deployed.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

None, the product has been absolutely rock-solid.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No, the solution has coped with tens of millions of dollars worth of transactions over the years.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

Very high.

Technical Support:

Extremely good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No.

How was the initial setup?

Yes, setup was fairly straightforward. It needed a little help with regards to the license server on the development platform, but once that was sorted out everything was smooth sailing.

What about the implementation team?

We developed our solution in-house.

What was our ROI?

Substantial, the payment platform is an essential customer service.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We found the pricing to be very reasonable.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did, however MicroFocus stood out with their excellent technical support.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about OpenText ALM / Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user567885 - PeerSpot reviewer
Testing Center Manager at Groupement des Mousquetaires
Vendor
You can include a requirement test case, feasibility of execution, and dashboard reporting for web or mobile applications.

What is most valuable?

It's a very good tool to use for referencing all testing components in the lifecycle of the application end to end. For example, you can include a requirement test case, feasibility of execution, and dashboard reporting for web or mobile applications.

How has it helped my organization?

The benefit is to track coverage of functionality, and to have a stronger application without bugs in production.

What needs improvement?

Integration with other tools would be good, for example, with open-source tools. In the meantime, we do something with JIRA, with Selenium, and so on, and it's good; but we can increase this connectivity with other tools.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

For the past month, the solution has been more stable than it has been over the past 10 years. For our mobile center, for example, we started using it this year; but it's not very stable for the moment. ALM, however, is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

For the moment, we use it for our projects; but our testing centre is only in one location, and not for offshore. We haven’t had to scale it much.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support depends; frequently, it's not very responsive in resolving our problem, but engineers handle it too late.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

In the past, we used a Compuware Solution and an open source solution. We switched to ALM because tracking all activities is better when all your monitoring is on products from the same vendor.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was okay.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

The IBM solution is very hard to set up and to use. The Silk solution, which is now Micro Focus, is very strong.

With ALM, it’s simple.

What other advice do I have?

Use ALM because it's simple; it has all information you need to communicate with all people involved in a project, whether they are in IT or not IT. This is the aim of the testing lifecycle.

The most important thing when choosing a vendor is that the product is user friendly and can integrate with all your old modules. It helps to have one application rather than multiple applications to connect with all the different companies.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user469161 - PeerSpot reviewer
Micro Focus ALM/Mobile Center/UFT Administrator/Software Quality Analyst III at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Provides the classic benefits of an application lifecycle management tool.

What is most valuable?

HP ALM helps us consolidate our efforts. All of our projects are in there. We are also in the life science domain so we have many more compliance requirements which we have to adhere to. It's pretty good so far.

How has it helped my organization?

As a user we see one version of the requirements for the application, we keep all our assets together, it gives us a huge traceable. It's all the classic benefits of using an application lifecycle management tool that are available.

What needs improvement?

We look at service packs, what bugs they have and fixes. From a end-user perspective when you have invested heavily in these tools for the last four, five, six years or more, organizations are there from when it was Mercury. We just want to keep pace with where the industry is going, where the shift is in terms of quality assurance and requirement management. HP is very strong on the testing side, but in the last few years with the agile methodology it has lagged behind. It's slowly catching up and eventually it will get there, but we love the eco-system we're in and will continue to move forward.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's stable

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's very scalable, a very robust kind of solution and we recommend it to anyone who's looking for application lifecycle kind of tool.

How are customer service and technical support?

We use an HPE partner for our support needs, but tickets do go to HPE eventually, level two, level three. We have never had an issue.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our organization is very new in this area. We are a pretty young company. We didn't have any formal task-management kind of tool or testing tool per se. When we were looking at the solution one of our implementation partners for one of the projects recommended it and we looked at it and it's capability. Many of the folks who are on the team have used it in other companies. For the current organization it was a no-brainer not to pick this tool.

How was the initial setup?

It's very straightforward.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Since we are in a regulated industry we have to use the workflow we use, what was built for this. For us it was a straight-forward choice. For large and small companies there are a lot of choices for task-management tools. IBM rational tools are there and then there's JIRA, there's also TFS. There are a lot of task-management tools. They can pick any one that they want to.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user326448 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Test Analyst and Automation Engineer at Unum
Real User
It added structure to the test process and enabled the developers to better understand the QA process, though it should integrate with Agile Manager.

What is most valuable?

The overarching lifecycle view, from requirements gathering through to testing and defect resolution. Additionally the ability to customize the user permissions so they can only see and do what their job role permits.

How has it helped my organization?

It added structure to the test process and enabled the developers to better understand the QA process. This in turn led to an improvement in the code developed in-house.

What needs improvement?

As a standalone QA tool it meets the needs adequately, but it really needs combining with other solutions, such as Agile Manager, to get the best full lifecycle solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

Around 14 years from when it was originally called Test Director.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There are still some issues when deploying to a few end user machines but the install and upgrade process is very easy. Some of these issues will be resolved in later releases.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Very stable with no reported issues in years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There are options to increase the scale of use and extra modules that can be obtained with the full ALM license.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

On par with other big companies, sometimes you need to get past the front line support to get to the real answers.

Technical Support:

Good, quick turnaround with ideas and solutions to try.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

QA was driven by spreadsheets before the deployment of Test Director.

How was the initial setup?

The documentation is not always easy to follow but the answers can be found on the support forum and help desk.

What about the implementation team?

The initial deployment was with a vendor over 14 years ago, but all subsequent updates have been done in-house.

What was our ROI?

It's unknown, but I suspect it to be quite significant.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

More recently it was reevaluated against Microsoft Test Manager to see if it was still the best QA tool for our needs.

What other advice do I have?

It is still the best QA tool on the market that integrates with most of other tools we use. It allows everyone who wants to be able to see the current quality of the project and control the QA process.

Fully understand the different options out there and the license types. Other tools may offer similar and you will probably want to customize some of the options to get the best out of it. Have not tried the cloud option which would take away any implementation and upgrade issues.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user326448 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user326448Technical Test Analyst and Automation Engineer at Unum
Real User

Agree with you on the Workflow - the editor could be a lot better but I guess they are trying to get most people to use the built in functionality and not push the limits of what it can do.

See all 2 comments
Anouar RAID - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior SAP Functional Consultant at YAAS IT
Consultant
Useful for test designing, test planning, and test execution, but lacks management visibility and its dashboard needs improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "What's most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is that it's useful for these activities: test designing, test planning, and test execution."
  • "Currently, what's missing in the solution is the ability for users to see the ongoing scenarios and the status of those scenarios versus the requirements. As for the management tools, they also need to be improved so users can have a better idea of what's going on in just one look, so they can manage testing activities better."

What is our primary use case?

I'm using Micro Focus ALM Quality Center for testing purposes.

What is most valuable?

What's most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is that it's useful for these activities: test designing, test planning, and test execution.

What needs improvement?

What could be improved in Micro Focus ALM Quality Center are the dashboard and the management tools particularly used for management reviews. Currently, what's missing in the solution is the ability for users to see the ongoing scenarios and the status of those scenarios versus the requirements. As for the management tools, they also need to be improved so users can have a better idea of what's going on in just one look, so they can manage testing activities better.

An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is having management visibility on the dashboard. For example, it would be so much easier if there's global information that users could work with.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Micro Focus ALM Quality Center for six months now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is a stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center should be scalable, but I don't know what's behind the infrastructure, so I'm unsure of its scalability.

How are customer service and support?

I don't deal directly with external support. I'm dealing with internal support, so I can't rank the technical support for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. I don't deal with their support directly.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

My organization previously used HP Quality Center, but I don't remember the differences between that solution and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. I also don't make decisions on whether to move from one solution to another solution.

How was the initial setup?

I wasn't part of the team who set up Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, so I don't have information on whether the process was straightforward or complex.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I'm not aware of the pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.

What other advice do I have?

At least sixty people who are part of different departments are using Micro Focus ALM Quality Center in the organization I'm working for now.

There are people who use the solution once a day, while there are people who use it twice a week, etc. It depends on their positions.

I'm rating Micro Focus ALM Quality Center six out of ten. What would make it an eight or a nine for me is improving the dashboard and adding a management tool that would be useful for management reviews.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Senior Specialist - Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Real User
Not easy to set up or use, UFT tests run poorly, and it does not scale well
Pros and Cons
  • "The integration with UFT is nice."
  • "The UFT tests don't work very well and it seems to depend on things as simple as the screen resolution on a machine that I've moved to."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution primarily for doing test cases and running UFT cases.

What is most valuable?

The integration with UFT is nice.

What needs improvement?

We are having a lot of problems with this solution. One example is that users are able to run test cases, but the permissions are managed by another group.

I don't have the ability to create test sets.

A lot of the testing steps are ad-hoc in nature where they have a lot of prerequisites, but they don't specify what the prerequisites are.

The organization that I am at is not very good in the sense that even finding test cases that need to be run is very difficult.

The UFT tests don't work very well and it seems to depend on things as simple as the screen resolution on a machine that I've moved to. Specifically, if I move to a screen with a different resolution then it throws things off.

For how long have I used the solution?

I first started using Micro Focus ALM Quality Center in 2011.

We are using version 12. It has a new name, it's called HPE application Lifecycle Management.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the hardware is okay. It's just the tool itself is not easy to use at all.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is not great at all, especially with the licensing model.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have never had to use them because we have an in-house group that manages many of our issues. I don't know what their interactions have been with Micro Focus, but I have personally had never reached out to them.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with it, in general, is that the initial setup is not easy and that upgrades are dreaded. Companies tend to not go through the upgrade process because it causes many different types of issues, especially on the database side. This seems to be a longstanding bug with the management of permissions that goes all the way back to quality center days that have never been addressed. 

I would say that the initial setup is not easy at all.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing model is an area that can be improved.

The cost of licensing depends on the number of VMs that you are running test cases on and it is not cheap. To the best of my recollection, it is several thousand dollars per license.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are having a lot of problems with this product and we're now looking at other options.

What other advice do I have?

This is a product that I do not recommend but if someone were in a situation where they were intent on using it, my advice is definitely to plan it out ahead of time. Don't try to wing it and learn it on the fly. Have someone who knows the tool and can set up the proper authorization because otherwise, it will be like ours, which is a mess.

I would rate this solution a three out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1422234 - PeerSpot reviewer
Talent Acquisition Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
A good and very stable product for maintaining your test cases and requirements
Pros and Cons
  • "You can maintain your test cases and requirements. You can also log the defects in it and make the traceability metrics out of it. There are all sorts of things you can do in this. It is not that complex to use. In terms of user experience, it is very simple to adopt. It is a good product."
  • "The Agile methodology is now being used across all the organizations, but in this solution, we don't have a dashboard like Jira. In Jira, you can move your product backlogs from one space to another and see the progress, that is, whether a backlog is in the development stage or testing stage. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center does not have this feature. It is typically very straightforward. You just execute the test cases from it, and you just make them pass, fail, or whatever. They can also improve its integration with Jira. The browser support needs to be improved in this because it supports only Internet Explorer as of now. It does not have support for Firefox, Chrome, Safari, or any other browser. There are also some performance issues in it. Let's say that you are doing the testing, and you found something and are logging the defect. When you try to attach several or multiple screenshots with the defect, it slows down, which is a very common problem people face. I would like them to include a functionality where I am able to see the reports across all the projects. When you have multiple projects, being a manager, I would like to see the reports across all the projects. Currently, there is no single sign-on through which we can get all the information at one place. You need to log into it project-wise. If you have ten projects, you can't view the information in one dashboard."

What is our primary use case?

It is a test management tool where you write the test plan, test scripts, and test cases. You can log the defects that you found during the testing. You can also use it with other integrations, such as automation using UFT, where you execute the scripts from Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. We are using the latest version of this solution.

What is most valuable?

You can maintain your test cases and requirements. You can also log the defects in it and make the traceability metrics out of it. There are all sorts of things you can do in this.

It is not that complex to use. In terms of user experience, it is very simple to adopt. It is a good product.

What needs improvement?

The Agile methodology is now being used across all the organizations, but in this solution, we don't have a dashboard like Jira. In Jira, you can move your product backlogs from one space to another and see the progress, that is, whether a backlog is in the development stage or testing stage. Micro Focus ALM Quality Center does not have this feature. It is typically very straightforward. You just execute the test cases from it, and you just make them pass, fail, or whatever. They can also improve its integration with Jira.

The browser support needs to be improved in this because it supports only Internet Explorer as of now. It does not have support for Firefox, Chrome, Safari, or any other browser. 

There are also some performance issues in it. Let's say that you are doing the testing, and you found something and are logging the defect. When you try to attach several or multiple screenshots with the defect, it slows down, which is a very common problem people face.

I would like them to include a functionality where I am able to see the reports across all the projects. When you have multiple projects, being a manager, I would like to see the reports across all the projects. Currently, there is no single sign-on through which we can get all the information at one place. You need to log into it project-wise. If you have ten projects, you can't view the information in one dashboard.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for more than 12 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a very stable product. It is a very old product.

How are customer service and technical support?

Whenever I face any issue or require an item for automation, such as for integrating Excel support, I can get it in the resource library. It has a resource library where you can get all of the stuff.

I don't have any direct contact with Micro Focus support. For any issues that I face while using the product, we have a ticketing system in my company. I just need to log the ticket, and the right person will resolve it. They might be contacting Micro Focus.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty simple.

What other advice do I have?

I would highly recommend this product because it is a very stable product. Around 70% to 80% of organizations are using this product. It is a very stable and popular product.

I would rate Micro Focus ALM Quality Center an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
YingLei - PeerSpot reviewer
YingLeiProduct Marketing Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
MSP

Thanks for rating ALM / Quality Center very high and strongly recommending it. I'm glad to hear it's valuable to your company and users find it easy to adopt.

Regarding your comments on client browser support, we now have a web-based client called Web Runner which works with any browser (Chrome, Firefox, Safari are surly in the list). As of version 15.5, its functionality includes test execution (both automated and manual), defect management and dashboard views, and we are continuing to enhance it. For more information on 15.5 release, please read community.microfocus.com

Regarding your comment on cross-project reporting, it has been available since long time ago, and you need the ALM edition to have this feature. Using the Graph Wizard, you just select your multiple projects and proceed with graph creation. See admhelp.microfocus.com

Please bookmark the following to keep informed on the latest information of ALM / Quality Center:
www.microfocus.com
admhelp.microfocus.com

Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText ALM / Quality Center Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText ALM / Quality Center Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.