Proofpoint Email Protection Reviews

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for the emails that we receive to determine if there is any suspicious attachment or content. It will detect and give us an alert on our dashboard. From there we can pick up the alerts and review and take action to mitigate the risk.

The most valuable feature of Proofpoint Email Protection is the central location dashboard for viewing all the related information for risk.

Proofpoint Email Protection could improve by allowing more customization of the reports, such as exceptions and black-and-white lists.

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for approximately four years.

Proofpoint Email Protection is stable.

The scalability of Proofpoint Email Protection is good because it is cloud-based.

We have approximately 5,000 people using this solution in my organization.

If we need to understand how to use the solution better we contact the support.

I rate the support of Proofpoint Email Protection a four out of five.

Positive

The initial setup of Proofpoint Email Protection is easy, it does not take more than a couple of weeks. However, it can depend on the business.

The solution is expensive.

My company is using the solution because it is one of the leading email security providers, and it has gone through a review by the application security team. The features were in line with our requirements.

I recommend Proofpoint Email Protection because it provides everything in one place, such as security control. I would suggest having a separate solution for security control and another for email business flow. This way it would give a separation of duties instead of having everything in one place, the business policy as well as the security policy. Sometimes it is not the best way to manage both policies in one place. It's better to have a dedicated security, email security gateway where we can control the security of the organization.

I rate Proofpoint Email Protection a nine out of ten.

I gave my rating because the solution provides everything in one place and it has a lot of features for more insight regarding suspicious emails. I can see how many users received it, the attack vector, and the repetition of the email.

Proofpoint Email Protection is used to protect your entire email.

Proofpoint Email Protection has improved the organization by reducing spam emails.

Proofpoint Email Protection could improve the Mail Trace feature and make navigation easier.

I have used Proofpoint Email Protection within the last 12 months.

The stability of Proofpoint Email Protection is very good.

I have not had an issue with the scalability of Proofpoint Email Protection.

We have had projects with 5,000 users and some with 50 users using Proofpoint Email Protection. We are using this solution extensively and we plan to increase our usage of the solution.

The support from Proofpoint Email Protection is very good. 

I would rate the support from Proofpoint Email Protection a four out of five.

We previously used Proofpoint Email Protection on-premise to Proofpoint Email Protection on the cloud.

Proofpoint Email Protection's initial installation is straightforward. It took us less than a day to complete the implementation.

The solution charges per user per month to use it. There are not any additional fees in addition to the standard living fees.

We did evaluate other options before we choose Proofpoint Email Protection.

Proofpoint Email Protection is a very robust solution. I would advise others to read the manual before use.

I rate Proofpoint Email Protection an eight out of ten.

It does have some issues, but it's very good.

The solution protects our mailboxes from phishing and scanning.

The solution is very user-friendly.

The flexibility of the solution can be improved. We have a history of a white labeling project that we completed with one of the largest worldwide telecom companies. We encountered a major issue with some blending cases, as it was almost impossible to meet the blending of colors or requirements expected by our customers within the white labeling project. This is not only a technical issue, but from a marketing perspective, it is also very important. A white hyperlink means that we have prepared a dedicated infrastructure specifically labeled. All parts of our service had to be labeled with a very specific brand, and it was very challenging to make it all happen.

I have been using the solution for a few years.

The solution is stable.

For customers unfamiliar with DNS settings, we created very specific instructions with informative graphics to make the process less complicated. If we had no knowledge, it could have been difficult, so we created several infographics to show the steps that needed to be taken, and it worked.

The time to deploy depends on if we have a dedicated person or team working on the deployment or if we have to pull someone off another job.

The implementation is completed in-house.

We have a very specific licensing setup for all the vendors we use for our infrastructure. The end customer is buying our solution, which can be for monthly or annual usage depending on our payment and business model. If someone is trying to test the imaging, the shortest period for testing is a free trial of either fourteen days or seven days or a paid period of one month. The customer does not need to worry about any licensing with Proofpoint, as this is included with our solution.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

We have almost 1000 people using the solution.

I recommend the solution to others.

The targeted attack protection that we use has been great, as has the email filtering and the rules that we have set for Proofpoint. The quarantine capabilities are very useful.

You can scale the solution.

It's a mature product. It does a good job in detection. 

The false positives are an issue. There are many false positives that come in, which you report to Proofpoint. Sometimes they take time to update those things. They say there's an option that we can use to report false positives. However, it is not a quick remedy. You go and report it, and still, you have to take action on it and clear those emails getting blocked. It's too cumbersome. 

We don't have the option to scan a password-protected attachment. I have to either blindly whitelist it as it will get blocked since an email with attachments normally gets scanned. We'd like to have some mechanism in place where we can scan these protected attachments or whitelist the domain.

I've been working with the solution for two years. 

We purchased some licenses, and we are using all of them. For us, scalability is not a problem. We have been able to scale it. 

We have more than 5,000 people working on the product.

Technical support is good. The expertise that they offer is good. The only thing that I have a problem with is we have our support operations in India and their availability for a call can be mismatched. That would normally take some time. You don't get a suitable person in the time zone available around the clock.

We did not previously use a different solution.

I was not there when it was deployed. We only manage at the application level.

We do not need that many admins to maintain it. We might need three or so. Most of the time, it's only checking on the blocked emails, which are actually good emails, and sometimes if there are investigations required and maintenance, they would handle those tasks. At a minimum, you need three, depending on the size of your organization. They would maintain it for the shift, for fixed operations hours, not on a rotational basis. You might have to put in more resources if you have rotational.

Depending upon your company's revenue, you can make up your mind about whether you want to invest that money or not. However, the offering is niche in the market today compared to other products, like Exchange Online Protections, which is an evolving product. It's growing. In contrast, Proofpoint has been around in the listing for quite some time, so they mature in terms of detection of suspicious emails and its email filtering system. Of course, while the pricing is rather fair, clients would always prefer to pay less. 

I cannot speak to the exact price. 

The price is fixed. It doesn't change according to companies. It gives you multiple package options, so you can pick what suits you. 

You also get other add-on services, which if you've got a subject matter expert within Proofpoint, then you don't have to buy additional personnel from them to coordinate. You wouldn't need a customer success manager or somebody doing a health check for it. That might increase your cost. 

Next time, if I get an opportunity to reapply for a license, I might think of removing some of the add-on services, which might reduce the cost or the overall price that we are paying today. I don't know the actual standalone product cost, meaning what would be the product cost alone. It's dealt with by our procurement team, or they can check with Proofpoint to see the product pricing.

I have cross-checked this solution with Defender right now. We're doing a cost-benefit analysis and seeing if it makes sense for us to use it at all or not.

I'm a customer and end-user.

We are using Proofpoint Essentials right now. 

When you are an SME, every product company is trying to promote a product and sell it to you; however, if you don't know how it functions and its capability and effectiveness, then you probably end up buying what you need. Constantly evaluate any product you're buying. I've seen Proofpoint used in the last three companies that I worked with, so I have a lot of experience with this particular solution.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The solution is primarily used for email protection. However, it is not as good as EDR. It is good at handling privacy.

It's helped us when one of our senior managers got a fake email about getting a payment. The solution automatically flagged and notified us. 

It's great for email protection.

It's very good at identifying threats.

There is useful sandboxing available.

The pricing is very reasonable. This is an affordable product.

Technical support is very good. 

Sometimes it detects false positives. 

We'd like the sandbox to integrate with the on-prem device. 

It needs to identify the paths and signatures. We'd like advanced machine learning for detection. 

We'd like the have more lunch and learns to get more out of the solution. 

I've used the solution for around two years. 

I'd rate the stability five or six out of ten. It's okay. It's not perfect.

I'd rate the scalability around six or seven out of ten. It's decent. 

We have around 100 people using it. 

Technical support is quite good. We are happy with the level of support we receive. 

Positive

It was quite easy to set up. 

We have about four people able to deploy and maintain the product. 

I have witnessed an ROI after using it. 

The pricing is reasonable. I'd rate the pricing one out of ten in terms of affordability. It is not expensive at all. 

I've been using the latest version of the solution. 

If you understand email technicalities like email authentication, you will have an easy time with the solution. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

I use the solution to protect email. It's primarily used for security purposes. 

The solution has improved the productivity of the users. It works in the background protecting us.

The protection has been fair so far. We haven't had any issues. 

It's easy to set up. The deployment is also fast. 

The solution has been stable.

The solution scales well. 

So far, the protection on offer is okay. There are no improvements needed at this time. 

The solution could lower its price. 

I've been using the solution for quite a long time at this point. I'm not sure how long it has been 

We have not had any stability issues. There are no bugs or glitches. It is reliable. 

It is scalable. It's easy to expand. We have about ten people using it in our environment. 

The initial setup is straightforward. It is not overly complex at all.

The deployment itself is very quick. It doesn't take long to set up. You only need one person to set up the solution. 

The solution could be cheaper. The pricing is transparent. There are no extra costs. 

I am a customer and end user. 

I'm not sure which version I'm using. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. It's okay. 

We use it in front of Office 365 for anti-phishing, anti-malware, and threat protection.

Proofpoint Email Protection has reduced the analyst overhead in responding to phishing incidents by several orders of magnitude. We did not have the resources to respond directly to all Phishing Reports under the old system  With automated responses, we are able to address all Phishing Reports automatically.

Its anti-phishing functionality is very valuable to the organization.  As outlined above, we are able to automatically respond to Phishing Reports as well as stop as much as 80% of most Phishing Attacks at the front end leaving only a small percentage to be handled after the fact.

It has too many screens. It is kind of a conglomeration of products. In other words, they built product A, product B, and product C, and they are yet to integrate them into a single administrative console. I would certainly like to see a more seamless administrative interface. 

I would also like to see them include more bang for the buck, by including features like email fraud protection, rather than making their product so piecemeal, where you are buying little pieces. I agree with the idea of having multiple tiers or layers, but maybe as small, medium, and large, as opposed to an a la carte menu.

I have been using this solution for one year.

It is very stable.

It is fairly scalable. When we had a problem with capacity on one of the clusters, we simply added more members. We have probably 32,000 to 34,000 users in a given period.

Their technical support is mediocre. It could be better. They're a little slow to respond at times, and depending on the product, they're not always very knowledgeable. In one case, I had to fix it myself and show their tech how to fix it.

I found it to be fairly straightforward. It had medium complexity. The deployment was very fairly fast. I did it in about three to four hours.

Annually, it costs us about $92,000. This is pretty much what it costs us. There is no additional cost.

I evaluated Microsoft ATP or Microsoft Advanced Threat Protection. I also evaluated Mimecast at least at face value. I also looked at GreatHorn technologies.

They're the best in the breed. I would rate Proofpoint Email Protection a ten out of ten for the capability of doing its job. I am happy with this solution.

Our primary use case is the encryption tooling of email security. Emails sent externally are automatically encrypted as is all the information included. There are some DLP related options available in Proofpoint, which we enabled with the help of classifying the emails, like internal, external, private, public, sharing. That's our main use. We are customers of Proofpoint.

The value for us is that we now have much better control over emails, especially those sent via Office 365 on the cloud. We've configured it so that all emails go to Proofpoint and are quarantined or encrypted. I believe the quarantine email function is very rare to find in other solutions. It's a powerful tool and I believe cost effective.

Integration for reporting needs to be improved, it's a little complex. Right now we have integrated with Power BI to get logs and information from Proofpoint. That has to be improved with the API and there are also latency issues which need to be simplified and improved. Those are the areas I've observed that need improvement. 

The solution is hosted by Proofpoint on Amazon AWS, with some on servers on-prem. We've done the load balancing and I believe it's pretty strong now. We haven't experienced any issues. 

Scalability is good, we have around 100,000 employees. For now, we have implemented two data centers. It covers 60% of traffic. We're moving ahead so that by the end of the year we'll have 100% implementation. 

Technical support is relatively good although the solutions and ticketing system requires a lot of improvement.

We were previously using Symantec but switched to Proofpoint because Symantec didn't offer the email quarantine function. Cost was another issue with Symantec being a more expensive solution. But the main reason we switched was because we were looking for more control over the cloud email, especially with the sensitive information we have. 

The initial setup was a mixed experience. Nothing is simple nowadays and we were dealing with both cloud and on-prem, dividing the load blancing. As a result, it's taken almost six months to get full implementation. We were testing for a lot of that time. We initially implemented only in the cloud. And later on we integrated it with the reporting applications, and lastly we implemented on-prem. We are a team of seven, and implemented ourselves. I did a lot of demos and trainings which helped us a lot when it came to deploying ourselves.
We now have around 10 staff who have access to the administration portal; the project manager, a couple from the messaging team, architects, and security engineers. 

We evaluated Forcepoint and McAfee but both dropped out in the middle stage and we moved on to testing with Proofpoint. Both solutions had an easy environment, with an easy to configure and straightforward dashboard. However, when it came to security controls, including inscription and quarantine options, those things were more available in Proofpoint. 

We've observed that we have almost 99.9% control over our emails now in an easy to configure and easy to implement solution. It's simple and easy for the administration as well. We're looking forward to any upgrades or updates they provide. I recommend this solution if it suits your needs and requirements. If you have concerns about data floating in emails, it's a good solution. If that's not an issue then you can choose something else.

I rate the solution nine out of 10.