Proofpoint Email Protection Reviews

My primary use case for this solution is for email security.

The most valuable feature of this solution is that it's a one-stop shop for email protection.

We have some use cases that haven't been dealt with yet, so that could be improved.

I have been using this solution for eight years.

Proofpoint's support is very responsive, especially in comparison to Microsoft. Commonly a specialist is available within 24 hours, and the support is more professional overall.

The product has decent functionality. I would rate this product as eight out of ten.

We use Proofpoint for advanced email protection from a number of threats, including phishing and account spoofing.

This solution has reduced the number of phishing and spoofed emails that we have received.

The most valuable feature is the ability to remove bad messages that were delivered, prior to being classified as unwanted.

Proofpoint should have better integration with complex environments that need more than one instance of Proofpoint, as there are issues with nested instances.

We have been using this solution for six months.

Our company uses the solution for a customer's email security. 

Three years ago, the solution opened offices in Saudia Arabia. Previously, you could only deal with distributors. 

We were introduced to the solution and conducted proof of value and concept for one customer. We implemented one year ago and the customer is happy with the solution. 

Our customer has 5,000 users across a big company with many branches. 

The solution is dedicated to email security and that is its core business. It is a leader in comparison to other vendors. 

The solution has very strong detection for most phishing and malicious emails received from the outside. It is stronger in this area than competitors. 

The TRAP is great for analytics and correlations related to the mailbox. 

The solution should add post-sales training. There is no issue with the product itself but education could be improved because no information related to implementations is available. We can find sales and pre-sales training but are in need of post-sales training similarly to what is offered by other vendors. 

If we know how the product works, we can implement it. Sometimes, customers ask the solution to handle implementations and that is costly. We would like the training to fully handle implementations and save our customers money. 

I have been using the solution for three years. 

The solution is stable. We had a problems during implementation but none after that was completed. We haven't received complaints or emails related to issues with the solution. 

Stability is rated a nine out of ten. 

The solution is very nice and flexible, particularly for virtual machines. 

Our customer did not have the particular requirement to scale.  

Scalability is rated a nine out of ten. 

Our customer has direct contact with the solution's technical support. They can escalate a case directly so sometimes do this instead of contacting our company. 

Our customer has only opened one case with technical support. There were no problems with the process and the support team was both helpful and flexible. 

The Saudi and UAE teams are especially flexible and help with small favors. Other vendors do not provide this level of support.

Technical support is rated a nine out of ten. 

Positive

Our customer had an obsolete email security gateway from Trend Micro. This product had good endpoint protection in general, but was not strong when it came to email security so the customer did not renew the contract.

The setup is straightforward and easy so I rate setup a nine out of ten. 

Three of our technicians implemented the solution for our customer. Implementations depend on use case and customer preparedness.

If all prerequisites are prepared by the customer in advance, then implementation is straightforward and takes one or two weeks.

Our implementation took about four months because our customer did not prepare the prerequisites. This caused a delay in the project. Otherwise, this implementation would have been completed in a week to ten days.

We handle ongoing maintenance and our customer also has a direct pipeline to the solution's technical support.

Our company has not yet realized an ROI because we recently became partners so have only closed one project. We are doing our best now to propose the solution to other customers. 

In general, the pricing is competitive. It is not expensive or inexpensive. Pricing is a bit above average but the solution is a leader in the area. 

I rate pricing a six out of ten. 

We conducted a proof of concept and proposed Forcepoint and the solution as possible options. To be honest, the solution is many times better than Forcepoint for email security.

Forcepoint has many issues that are also used for email security in another mode. We were not getting much success with email security so we proposed Proofpoint as a better option. 

The two types of email protection include the gateway and the mailbox from the inside. The solution offers three tools for full protection.

The PPS provides email protection as a gateway. The IMD protects internal emails in general. The TRAP is great for analytics and correlations related to anything happening in the mailbox. 

We replaced Trend Micro and implemented all three of the solution's protection components. 

If you want the solution to be implemented properly, then it is important for customers to have prerequisites ready. Technically, the solution can be implemented but customers need to understand their wants, needs, and requirements to ensure a successful implementation. Implementations are easy and flexible when requirements are known in advance. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for a variety of services. It's mostly related to email. 

The state-of-the-art security is the solution's most valuable aspect. 

The solution scales quite well.

The product offers very good value for money.

The solution is very easy to handle overall.

The implementation process is simple and straightforward.

The incident reporting on offer needs to be improved. It's lacking right now. It should be on the platform somewhere.

I've been using the solution for three years so far.

The scalability of the solution is excellent. That has to do with the fact that it is placed behind the load balancers. It makes it so that we have no problems with scalability. It's very, very good. If a company needs to scale, they can do so with ease.

The technical support is okay. We don't have any complaints on that front. We're largely satisfied with the level of support we receive.

Our organization also has some experience with Cisco, however, I don't directly deal with it on a technical level per se.

While the initial setup is straightforward, in all cases, those doing the impr=lementation need to be well-prepared for the project.

While the final deployment takes two days, which isn't very long, the research front should take at least a month. Being prepared at the outset will ensure all parties are happy with the end results once everything is up and running.

The pricing is reasonable, however, it's expensive. It offers good value. You get good value for your money for it, so it's no problem spending as much as you do.

We're just consultants. We help our clients with this product.

Overall, we've been happy with the product and the results we've gotten. I would rate the product at a nine out of ten.

While I don't have specific advice, I can say that the solution is easy to handle and we didn't have any troubles with the initial implementation. It was pretty seamless. I'd recommend the solution to other organizations.

We primarily use the solution for email protection. 

The pricing is great.

It has a nice interface.

The features are very good. 

The stability is very good. 

The solution is scalable. 

The price policy needs to be better. We'd still like lower pricing. 

The initial setup is complex. 

I've been using the solution for the last 12 months at least.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable. 

It's scalable. You can expand it if you need to. 

While I haven't had contact with the technical support, my understanding is it's not the worst in the world. 

Neutral

We found the initial setup to be pretty complex. It was not necessarily straightforward or simple. 

The pricing is very good. However, the price policy needs improvement. While we find it reasonable, we'd always like it to be a bit less. 

I'd rate the affordability two out of five. 

I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

We are just end-users, and we are using this solution on a small project. 

We use Proofpoint Email Protection for machine learning and artificial intelligence engine.

The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are ease of use, data loss prevention, antivirus, and spam protection. 

Proofpoint Email Protection's interface is confusing and could be improved.

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for approximately one year.

Proofpoint Email Protection is stable.

We have apparently 100 people using Proofpoint Email Protection in my organization.

The technical support we receive is very good.

The initial setup of Proofpoint Email Protection is easy. The installation model for the moment is very confused. It would be a benefit if the next release was easier.

I rate Proofpoint Email Protection a nine out of ten.

Proofpoint is number one in terms of market share worldwide. We recommend it to clients because of its rich features. It offers a lot of choices. We primarily use the solution because of its rich features in email protection. It also provides protection for the cloud. It provides backup targeted attack protection features as well.

The solution is very simple.

The anti-spam features are excellent on the email firewalls.

The program's interface is easy to use. We've found that end-users have been very happy in terms of the usage provided and the delivery of an email solution that protects them.

The search functionality is quite small. It could be a bit more in-depth. Right now, it's a bit simple.

The solution could be improved with the addition of PLP and email encryption features.

Our company has been working with Proofpoint for two years.

The stability of the solution is fine. We haven't had any negative feedback from any of our customers.

We have contacted technical support in the past. However, Proofpoint offers access to technical support via a portal for end-users. Sometimes end-users can't access the portal. In this case, technical support is largely directly through the vendors. 

The initial setup is straightforward. We found it quite easy.

Deployment took approximately two to three days. It does, however, depend on the customer-commissioned network setup.

We supply the solution to the end-user.

The pricing is relative; it's not a fixed amount, so it's hard to discuss exact numbers.

Our company is a direct partner of Proofpoint and not an end-user. Since I don't have too much experience with usage, I don't think I can speak to it as well as a typical user. We work with Email Protection and Targeted Attack Protection.

We handle the on-premises deployment model.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. I'm very happy with it, and even one year after implementation I haven't had any issues with it or had any customers who were displeased with the solution.

The most valuable feature of Proofpoint Email Protection is the dashboards and their visibility, easy configuration, and artificial intelligence. Additionally, the reports are very important and helpful.

You only receive one model in Proofpoint Email Protection and the other ones you have to purchase at a high price. There should be more available with the solution and additional models should be less expensive.

The administrator that manages the service should be better in their role. They don't have enough people to manage the service well.

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for less than a year.

The initial setup of Proofpoint Email Protection was very simple.

We worked with the vendor to implement Proofpoint Email Protection.

I rate Proofpoint Email Protection a nine out of ten.