No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Head of IT Infrastructure at Cranfield University
Real User
Feb 2, 2021
Lowers our overall management costs and provides single pane of glass management
Pros and Cons
  • "Rubrik is a faster unit from a hardware perspective. Things, like Live Mount, mean we can bring services back straightaway, then have them transition back into the live storage in the background. Because we can use Live Mount to do instant restores, a restore is now a five-minute job. Then, the rest of it is done in the background, rather than doing something for an hour before you actually get the restore back."
  • "From Rubrik being delivered to it ingesting backups, it took about an hour."
  • "I would like to see the entire Office 365 product suite backed up by Rubrik. For instance, they do SharePoint and Exchange online, but they don't back up Microsoft Teams. So, I would like to see more of the Office 365 suite added into their backup capabilities."
  • "I would like to see the entire Office 365 product suite backed up by Rubrik. For instance, they do SharePoint and Exchange online, but they don't back up Microsoft Teams."

What is our primary use case?

We have it onsite and in the cloud. We also make use of their SaaS offering as well.

Primarily, we back up our VMware estate. We back up Azure VMs and Office 365 as well as some physical boxes.

We used to be on r348, so now we're on r6408.

How has it helped my organization?

Rubrik provides us with all our backup services: onsite backups, Office 365 Backups, and Azure Backups (IaaS).

We can now just point the solution at our virtual environment and know that we are protected. No longer do we have to manage backup jobs. The simplicity of the SLA-based policy automation means that we are just protected.

Rubrik sits alongside things, like the VMware SRM product, so we can use it in a PowerShell integration. We can test and verify our backups using the Live Mount functionality. That is saving us probably one or two days a month.

Rubrik is a faster unit from a hardware perspective. Things, like Live Mount, mean we can bring services back straightaway, then have them transition back into the live storage in the background. Because we can use Live Mount to do instant restores, a restore is now a five-minute job. Then, the rest of it is done in the background, rather than doing something for an hour before you actually get the restore back.

I have one man-day a week back across the team to do other more important jobs. So, it's not saving us money from that point of view. However, it allows my team to concentrate on the things that matter, rather than having to worry about the backup.

What is most valuable?

  • Backs up all our platforms. 
  • Its ease of use and single pane of glass management.
  • Performance. 
  • Lowers our overall management costs; we don't have to look after it anymore.

The solution's web interface is clean, simple, and easy to use.

Its archival functionality is great. We have used that from day one for Azure. The cloud backup was one of the key reasons to switch.

We use their predictive search. It is very much like your standard, usual search engine type approach. You can type in simple English and get results back from that. The easier the interface is to use, then the more time is saved in other peripheral tasks.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see the entire Office 365 product suite backed up by Rubrik. For instance, they do SharePoint and Exchange online, but they don't back up Microsoft Teams. So, I would like to see more of the Office 365 suite added into their backup capabilities.

Buyer's Guide
Rubrik
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about Rubrik. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using it for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is fantastic. We have not had any downtime. We have not had any issues with it at all. It has been good and stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not had to scale too far. We have six nodes at the moment and are capable of going to 32 nodes, if we need to. We don't really make use of that scalability, but I know other customers who do. I would be quite happy to scale it, if we need to.

There are six people who know how to use Rubrik at Cranfield. This is my systems team: cloud engineers and systems admins. 

How are customer service and support?

We used the support services a couple of times early on, because we were quite early adopters. They were fantastic. When you speak to support, you get an engineer who knows what they are doing straightaway. There is no multi-tiered support, so you get someone very quickly who knows exactly what your issues are. Nine times out of 10, we have had a resolution extremely quickly.

After the first month, we did not really use support because the solution worked fine. So, we used support early on, and they were great. Since then, we have not had to use support, which is even better.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before we had Veeam, we were with Dell EMC Data Domain storage.

We previously were a Veeam customer. With Rubrik, we could replicate directly into Azure. That released the operational costs of having a third-party hosted solution offsite. We have been able to remove that, managing it directly in Azure.

How was the initial setup?

From Rubrik being delivered to it ingesting backups, it took about an hour. To get it out of the box, racked, configured, and ready to go was simple. To be perfectly honest, we have probably never used a product that was as simple as it to deploy.

We had a two-week window set to migrate our backups from the old system into Rubrik. Instead of it taking two weeks, it ended up taking three days, which saved us time tremendously.

What about the implementation team?

They were two IT systems administrators involved in the initial setup and deployment. I have a general team of cloud engineers who do the storage, cloud, and virtualization.

What was our ROI?

Managing backups, we have saved about 85 percent of the time from our previous solution.

We removed a software product, then removed the servers. We did not have to support servers nor storage arrays that it runs on, having a single platform to do everything. That led to TCO savings.

With our old service, managing the whole environment was about a day a week per person. Now, we are lucky if it is five minutes a day. From a complete solution and backup relation, we are saving 85 to 90 percent of our management time.

Return on investment primarily goes back to time savings. It allows my guys to spend time doing things that I need them to do rather than babysitting quite a labor-intensive backup service.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Originally, we bought the units on perpetual licenses. Now, we have switched to Rubrik Go. I think the Rubrik Go subscription is a better model, where it is based on your onsite environment and you consume what you use.

Going to subscription makes it more affordable because then the university does not have to find so much capital to spend upfront. Knowing that we are entering a deal for a number of years with fixed yearly payments allows me to manage budgets better.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked at Veeam with Data Domain, Cohesity, and NetApp. We looked to do it all with Microsoft Azure Backup services. However, the only one that really fit our environment and had the vision for what we were trying to do was the Rubrik solution.

Cost and complexity are probably the main reasons as well as the flexibility of the service that we can get. So, we are on that public cloud journey where services are moving between on-prem and the cloud. Rubrik offered us those enablement services. It allowed us to do the transition pieces that we needed or still need now. So, it was an all in one feature set. At the time, their vision and direction matched our vision and direction.

What other advice do I have?

Make sure you know your environment, so you know what you are putting in it before you start. It really does do what they say it does. The real takeaway is just make sure that you are aware of their products and capabilities, and that you can match them appropriately to your environment.

We haven't had any events of ransomware that required us to do that restore. However, we also have Polaris Radar in place to help us detect ransomware anomalies as well as Polaris Sonar that we use for compliance and malware detection. We have used Polaris for reporting on metadata, but not to extract it anywhere else.

Polaris hasn't necessarily changed our approach, but it has given us extra reassurances around key factors, like governance, compliance, ransomware activity, and cloud mobility. Whilst we have our internal policies and procedures in place, it is a tool that effectively is scanning our entire environment, helping to alert and bring issues to the fore if we have any of those problems.

We use the API to automate some of our processes, but we don't have it integrated into any of our other products.

I would rate this solution as a nine (out of 10).

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Phanindar Ada - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at YASH Technologies
Real User
May 10, 2024
Offers an initial setup phase which is very admin-friendly
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
  • "With Windows, it is difficult to configure Oracle Database."

What is our primary use case?

I use the solution in my company, and we use it to protect our on-prem managed servers from Oracle. My company is trying to back up VMware and VMs, which is the reason why we use Rubrik.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable area I noticed in Rubrik is in the area with the configuring of SQL backup. When we are adding SQL host to Rubrik, it is easy and reliable to configure SQL backups on Rubrik as well as to deal with VMware vCenter. The only thing I noticed in Rubrik is that configuring Oracle Database backup is difficult. When Oracle Database backup is hosted on Windows, configuring Windows on Rubrik is kind of a difficult or tough task.

What needs improvement?

When it comes to Oracle Database or Linux-based machines, it is easy to configure Oracle Database when we are using Linux. With Windows, it is difficult to configure Oracle Database. If the ease of configuration of Oracle Database while using Linux can be made possible with Windows, it will be a great help to the administrators.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have experience with Rubrik.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

From what I heard, most of my company's customers are migrating from different backup tools to Rubrik. My organization deals with around ten clients who use the product.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support is really great and good support.

How was the initial setup?

The product's initial setup phase is very admin-friendly.

The setup phase and upgrades issues and configuring Rubrik Edge using vCenter, VMware, or hypervisor. My company has good documentation from Rubrik. By going through the documentation, my company easily sets up a Rubrik-based environment. My company was involved in the deployment process of several Rubrik Edge servers for our customers. I have deployed Rubrik Edge servers using VMware and hypervisors. I have set up new physical Rubrik appliances, after which our company migrated the complete Rubrik to a different site, and we deployed it there.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

I integrated Azure Cloud with Rubrik for archival purposes. When we face a disaster, by using the cloud, we can simply connect as a reader on the different Rubrik brik, and we can make it a plug-and-play kind of stuff, which is a great feature introduced by Rubrik.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend the product to others.

Whenever I work with different customers who use different backup products, I suggest to them how they need to consider migrating to Rubrik. I recommend Rubrik to my company's customers who use legacy backup tools. The product is stable and reliable.

Speaking about the benefits offered by the product, I can say that my company's Rubrik license expired in May 2023. Rubrik's team gave my company a buffer time of two months to upgrade and renew our licenses, and such support was one of the great things I noticed about Rubrik.

I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Rubrik
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about Rubrik. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AbdulJaleel - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Lead at MORO
Real User
Top 5
Feb 10, 2022
Good performance, cheap, and easy to implement
Pros and Cons
  • "Rubrik is cheap, and you get good performance."
  • "We are protecting more than 3 petabytes of data daily, and we have more than 3,000 plus servers."
  • "Its reporting can be improved. Sometimes, I need to create reports to know whether something is available or not, how much frontend data is being protected, etc. Rubrik gives a lot of things in the report, which can be confusing. It isn't very easy to get reports. It shows all the backup, index, replication, and everything else in one report. So, I have to export, filter, and then do the calculations."
  • "Its reporting can be improved. Sometimes, I need to create reports to know whether something is available or not, how much frontend data is being protected, etc. Rubrik gives a lot of things in the report, which can be confusing."

What is our primary use case?

We're using it for the backup of our virtual machines or VMs for the cloud. It is also for the standalone. We have a connector with vCenter, and we are using it for the virtual machine backup.

It is on-premise. We have two Rubrik. We are using one as a standalone, and we are also using one Rubrik in our private cloud. It is an on-premise VMware cloud.

We haven't upgraded the software in the last one year. We do the security patch updates and hardware firmware upgrades, but at the software level, we haven't done any major updates. We are using the same version.

How has it helped my organization?

It provides cost savings. Cost-wise, it is beneficial for us. We are protecting more than 3 petabytes of data daily, and we have more than 3,000 plus servers. 

What is most valuable?

Rubrik is cheap, and you get good performance. 

Its implementation is easy and doesn't take much time. Scalability and high availability are also there.

What needs improvement?

NAS backup can be improved. We have a NAS share, and we were not able to configure that with Rubrik. We found a solution from Dell EMC called Avamar that has an accelerator for NAS backup. The NAS backup is quicker in Avamar with the accelerator hardware, but in Rubrik, it is time-consuming.

Its reporting can be improved. Sometimes, I need to create reports to know whether something is available or not, how much frontend data is being protected, etc. Rubrik gives a lot of things in the report, which can be confusing. It isn't very easy to get reports. It shows all the backup, index, replication, and everything else in one report. So, I have to export, filter, and then do the calculations. If they can improve these things, it would be good. We are managing services for our customers, and every month, I have to provide reports for different types of KPIs and SLAs. We need to provide KPIs to the customers in terms of:

  • How many clients are we protecting?
  • How much frontend data are we protecting?
  • How much recovery are we doing?
  • How many recovery jobs and backup jobs have we performed?
  • How many ad-hoc jobs have we performed?
  • How many new backup clients are we adding every month?

This is the information that I have to give to the customer to show the effort that we are putting in, but currently, we have to do a lot of manual tasks and customizations. If there is a way to generate such reports, it would be helpful. 

By default, it shows only weekly reports. There should also be monthly and quarterly reports.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Rubrik for the last one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Its performance and stability are fine. We haven't faced any issues in the past year.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable. We can add a node and scale it. 

In terms of its usage, it is used every day. Currently, we have only five users because we also have other solutions. We also have Dell EMC Avamar and Networker. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have been using EMC for the past seven or eight years, and we have recently started moving to Rubrik. When I calculate the ROI for both, there is a lot of difference, and that's why we started using Rubrik.

We are using Rubrik only for the VMware backup. VMware works fine with Dell EMC Avamar and Rubrik. Our environment also has SAP HANA, Oracle, SQL, but we are not using Rubrik for these. We use Dell EMC NetWorker for these.

How was the initial setup?

It was not complex. It was very fast, which is also a good thing about Rubrik. It just takes one day for hardware mounting and connectivity. In three days, we completed everything, including the integration between vCenters.

What about the implementation team?

It was implemented in-house. 

Its maintenance is minimal. Usually, for patching, we take support, and our staff works with the support. Currently, I have three to four people working for the data protection part. They work with Rubrik, and they also work with Avamar.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is just one cost, and it includes software and hardware. So, everything is included. 

It is better than other solutions in terms of cost. We also have Dell EMC Avamar in our environment, and we have to pay for the hardware and data domain. We also have to pay for the software license for the data protection suite. So, based on my calculations, I find Rubrik cheaper, and we are also getting good performance.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it an eight out of 10. Technically and operationally, everything is fine. In terms of implementation and cost also, it is fine, but its reporting needs to be improved.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1277985 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jan 19, 2022
Secure, simple to use , and the support is excellent
Pros and Cons
  • "Rubrik, when compared to Cohesity, Dell, and Veritas, was the best of the four."
  • "Rubrik, when compared to Cohesity, Dell, and Veritas, was the best of the four."
  • "The dashboard and user interface could be improved to make them more user-friendly."
  • "We had some stability issues; we encountered some bugs and glitches."

What is our primary use case?

It was a test environment for testing the backups.

What is most valuable?

Rubrik is a little better than Cohesity.

Rubrik, when compared to Cohesity, Dell, and Veritas, was the best of the four.

For the most part, it is easy to use.

It is secure.

What needs improvement?

The dashboard and user interface could be improved to make them more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

Rubrik was last used six months ago.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We had some stability issues. We encountered some bugs and glitches.

I recall having to go to the lab because we couldn't get in from the outside, we had to gain access from within, and I had a network.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Rubrik is easy to scale.

We had a team of about seven users when we were working with Rubrik.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support was pretty good. They were excellent.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have also worked with Cohesity, Dell, and Veritas. Cohesity was one of the simplest. It is more user-friendly.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

The Rubrik, team assisted us with the installation and the updates.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Rubrik a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1052715 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Technical Services at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jan 16, 2022
Excellent support, beneficial restorations, and simple installation
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of Rubrik are the restoration and ease of use."
  • "Rubrik is critical for our organization because it keeps our data safe and helps us meet all of our POs and TOs."
  • "The solution could improve by having fewer VM Stuns."
  • "The solution could improve by having fewer VM Stuns."

What is our primary use case?

We use Rubrik for backup and recovery.

How has it helped my organization?

Rubrik is critical for our organization because it keeps our data safe. It helps us meet all of our POs and TOs.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Rubrik are the restoration and ease of use.

What needs improvement?

The solution could improve by having fewer VM Stuns.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Rubrik for approximately three years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have recently scaled the solution and it went well.

We have an administrator and people who do the restorations that use the solution.

How are customer service and support?

I rate Rubrik support a five out of five.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were previously using Avamar, but we switch because it was too expensive.

How was the initial setup?

The initial installation was very simple. 

I would create the ease of installation a five out of five.

What about the implementation team?

We used a VAR for the implementation and our experience was excellent.

What was our ROI?

We haven't actually calculated the ROI, but there's a good return on investment.

I would rate the ROI of Rubrik a four out of five.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We are on an annual license to use Rubrik and it is priced well.

I would rate the price of Rubrik a four out of five.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other options before, such as Cohesity. We choose Rubrik because it was overall a better solution.

What other advice do I have?

If you are wanting to implement this solution I would recommend doing your homework and evaluating other solutions.

I rate Rubrik a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1752804 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Support Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jan 7, 2022
Enables archive to cloud location and automation around the PowerShell script but doesn't cater for open source databases
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the archive to cloud location and the automation around the PowerShell script. There are also reports and dashboards."
  • "The most valuable feature is the archive to cloud location and the automation around the PowerShell script."
  • "The only thing that can be improved is catering for open source databases because at the moment it doesn't cater for Mongo, MySQL, and Postgres."
  • "The only thing that can be improved is catering for open source databases because at the moment it doesn't cater for Mongo, MySQL, and Postgres."

What is our primary use case?

The use case is for backups of virtual environments, so it covers all IT areas. Whether it's infrastructure, virtualization or database platforms, our organization uses it for backups and storage.

The solution is deployed on-premise. The version I'm running is 5.3.1.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the archive to cloud location and the automation around the PowerShell script. There are also reports and dashboards. There is simplicity in going through the interface and servers and setting SLAs. Overall, the product is good. It's just a single pane of glass.

Rubrik has ransomware and encryption, so there is nothing I can fault on the technology.

What needs improvement?

The only thing that can be improved is catering for open source databases because at the moment it doesn't cater for Mongo, MySQL, and Postgres. It has a good database agnostic.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Rubrik for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Rubrik has come a long way. Initially, it was a bit unstable in giving incorrect information, but I think that has been rectified. The performance of the devices was an issue. When you added devices, it was a problem. Rubrik actually leverages off your Microsoft VSS, so Rubrik is basically just a front-end.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable, but you're just locked in because you have to buy a Rubrik device unless you go with the cloud.

There's another team that does maintenance. There are other products, so the team isn't just dedicated to Rubrik. We have about five individuals using Rubrik.

We are planning to increase usage. There are between a few hundred workloads to a thousand in IT. We're basically looking at cloud technology, so we're not actually using Rubrik.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is excellent.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I played with various technologies. I played with Veeam, Data Domain, Commvault, and Tivoli.

We switched to Rubrik because of the user interface. The other products use the same VSS Microsoft. The only difference between all these backup products is just the user interface, the PowerShell modules, and the reporting that it presents. 

The underlying technology is all the same, whether it is Veeam, Data Domain, whatever it is. The only thing is the compression and the deduplication. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment took a day or two.

What about the implementation team?

We worked with Rubrik for deployment.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10. 

In terms of the compression, there are other products out there that are better in terms of deduplication and recovery time. Another thing is that you have to buy a Rubrik device if you don't go cloud. You can't go buy another piece of software, so you're actually locked in.

My advice is if you want to go through Rubrik, then you must forward something that can protect the data and the backups from ransomware for end-to-end protection.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Srinivas-R - PeerSpot reviewer
General Manager - IT Infrastructure / Security at The Himalaya Drug Company
Real User
Nov 30, 2021
Effective Live Mount feature, reliable, and straightforward installation
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature has been the Live Mount feature."
  • "The Live Mount feature is one of the main features we use; it is saving us time in restoring the VMs, allowing us to give them quickly to the developers for testing, resulting in a faster turnaround time."
  • "There are some features to improve on in Rubrik. For instance, they should have a tool where we can integrate with our SAP HANA. Directly from the HANA studio, we should be able to do a backup. That's what I'm looking forward to in the future."
  • "There are some features to improve on in Rubrik. For instance, they should have a tool where we can integrate with our SAP HANA."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Rubrik for our server backups.

How has it helped my organization?

The Live Mount feature is one of the main features we use. It is saving us time in restoring the VMs, allowing us to give them quickly to the developers for testing. There is a faster turnaround time.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature has been the Live Mount feature.

What needs improvement?

There are some features Rubrik planning to give in next version. For instance, a tool where we can integrate with our SAP HANA native tool directly from the HANA studio/HANA Cockpit, to trigger backup and restore. We understand it is available in the new version, looking forward to it.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Rubrik for approximately three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Rubrik is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Rubrik is scalable. We can manage multiple Rubrik appliances from a single console.

All of our IT infrastructure team are using Rubrik. We are using it in at our data centers in  India, and we have another  in the middle east. We have recently increased our usage of the solution.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good. We have good contact, all the issues are resolved on time.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have previously used a backup tool only for virtual infrastructure, as we were migrating to SAP HANA from a virtual environment. We wanted to have a single solution for virtual and physical  environments , Rubrik is helping us in a great way here.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. However, since Rubrik was new to use and different than the previous our solution, there were some new things we need to understand, such as SLA based orchestrating. We were used to scheduling it manually before, Once SLA is done the automation in place.

The full implementation process took us two and a half weeks.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation was directly from the OEM.

What was our ROI?

We have received a return on investment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We pay annually for the license for Rubrik. There are no additional costs. Initially, we needed to set it up, negotiate and finalize the offer.

What other advice do I have?

I would advise people who are wanting to implement this solution to evaluate their business case and the business requirement prior to making their decision because every enterprise has a different requirements and environments, they should do the thorough assessments, POC's  then decide on what backup fits their needs.

I rate Rubrik a nine out of ten

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Principal at a venture capital & private equity firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Nov 25, 2021
Easy to set up, supports cloud backup, and can be used as a file server
Pros and Cons
  • "What I like about Rubrik is that you can back up to the cloud. It is a different kind of backup where you're not archiving the tape. Rubrik is a physical appliance. It is a dedicated appliance to which you can back up, and you can also back up to another device. So, you can back up to Rubrik and then to another device. If you have more than one site, you can set up Rubrik on site A and also on site B. You can back up to the Rubrik on site A and then replicate that data to the Rubrik on site B."
  • "What I like about Rubrik is that you can back up to the cloud, it is a different kind of backup where you're not archiving the tape, and as a dedicated physical appliance you can back up locally, to another device, and even replicate data between multiple sites."
  • "It is a lot more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."
  • "It is a lot more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."

What is most valuable?

What I like about Rubrik is that you can back up to the cloud. It is a different kind of backup where you're not archiving the tape. Rubrik is a physical appliance. It is a dedicated appliance to which you can back up, and you can also back up to another device. So, you can back up to Rubrik and then to another device. If you have more than one site, you can set up Rubrik on site A and also on site B. You can back up to the Rubrik on site A and then replicate that data to the Rubrik on site B.

I like it. There are so many functions. It can also be used as a file server. It is a physical appliance. It is a backup device, but it can also be used as a file server. It can back up a file share. 

What needs improvement?

It is a lot more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I didn't have any issues with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

You can scale it. It is expensive, and it normally requires their support team's help because it is a physical brick. So, you usually connect another brick to it, and it scales out to that brick. So, it is easy to scale out. Scalability is not a problem. 

How are customer service and support?

Since the time I've used it, I never had to call their support. I didn't have any issues with it.

How was the initial setup?

It is pretty easy to set up because it is a physical appliance. You just need to configure IP addresses. There is not much to set up on that. You just plug it into the network and assign IP addresses. After that, you just log in, and you're ready to go.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Some people say it is expensive, but you get what you pay for. If you want a Maserati, you have to pay for it. If you want to buy a Porsche, you have to pay for it.

What other advice do I have?

If you're still backing the tape, Rubrik is not going to be for you.

I would rate it a strong nine out of 10. It is a solid product.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Rubrik Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Rubrik Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.