SAP HANA Reviews

We're writing SQL queries for the verification process, and we're using SAP master tables for tables. We write huge queries for processing data.

The feature that I like the most is that we can transport the data to our web data application.

SAP HANA's performance is really perfect. We're working on big data, and SAP HANA is really working on high performance. We are happy working with it.

The user experience should be better. Its user interface is not good. I also don't like the transition concept. 

I have been working in the SAP HANA environment for around two years.

We have experienced some glitches, and we are solving them with the help of our technical team.

It is a bit complex, but if you follow the instructions, it can be installed. The initial setup could be easier.

SAP HANA is expensive, which isn't a problem for us because it is processing the data so fast.

It is an SAP tool. Therefore, replicating the data from SAP to HANA is easy because it provides a high-performance area without overworking the SAP site. Working with big data is really nice in the SAP HANA database.

I would rate SAP HANA a seven out of ten. I took some points because of the pricing, user experience, and stability issues.

The solution operates well. I had no problems with the functionality.

The current version we are using is lacking some unique features, we are upgrading to the newer version of this solution that has these features, S4 HANA.

I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has. We are going to continue to use the solution.

I rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.

Compared to Oracle, the licensing could be better. 

SAP HANA is not strong like Oracle when it comes to finance. They are only strong with the logistic business project.

I have around 12 years of experience implementing SAP HANA. 

It is stable.

It depends on the enterprise, but the average enterprise has 20 employees. They buy two accounts to use the SAP S4HANA. It means that on average the enterprise will buy 20% to buy the license.

So far technical support is good. If we have any problem that a local partner cannot resolve for the customer, they will write to SAP and support will help fix the problem.

The initial setup is straightforward. It usually takes around eight months but it depends on a customer's requirements. We can spend a month or two customizing. 

The SAP license fee is more expensive than other solutions like Oracle or Microsoft Dynamics.

I would rate SAP HANA a nine out of ten. Not a ten because of the price. 

We have a lot of clients from different industries, such as factories and hospitals. We have deployed it on the cloud as well as on-premises for various clients.

All features are valuable. 

They can improve their technology for the CRM subsystem. There are other products that are better and more effective for the CRM subsystem.

Its price could be better. It is expensive.

I have been using SAP HANA for several years. I have been using it since they launched the HANA database.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We have installed SAP HANA for around 15,000 users.

I would say they are average. Sometimes, they are not able to answer our questions, or their answers come very late after we have already resolved the issue. They should be more familiar with the product.

We used our own product, which we developed on our own. After engaging SAP, we substituted our own product with SAP HANA.

The initial setup was straightforward.

It is expensive.

I would recommend this solution. We plan to continue using this solution for our clients. 

I would rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.

It is a memory database that has all the content of the database. Once the database is turned on, it is loaded in the server RAM. It has a very huge bandwidth and data transfer. Once you try to do any queries against this database you can get the result very fast. You can get real-time output or results. This aspect is very helpful to me.

From the deployment-side, I don't have any issues with the solution and haven't heard of any problems from clients.

The solution is very expensive, however. The pricing depends on the number of users and many other factors that affect licensing.

It is very stable. I use the Linux operating system and find it to be quite stable.

The solution is scalable. You have horizontal or vertical capabilities. You can upgrade the server itself in case the memory is at capacity. The resources of one server are not enough because it's big. According to your requirements, you can expand by adding more servers into one big cluster.

I don't go through the official support team from SAP, but most of the time I use the website to find the answers I need. It's very detailed and most of the problems that I've faced in the past while handling the implementations I can find on the website or on the internet.

Before using SAP HANA, we used other SAP products.

The initial setup is straightforward. For one system, the stand-down system, it will take about four to five days for implementation from scratch. I often handle implementation, so for me, it's straightforward because I have some experience in this area. You do need a skilled team. You have to understand many areas if you want to deploy it yourself. You have to have experience with the storage, the network, with operating systems, etc. 

I know SAP itself recommends that you have to have a certificate or a certified person that can deploy SAP HANA.

We are an integrator, so we handle the installation for clients.

The SAP portfolio is huge. It covers all industries and fields. It is very wide horizontally or vertically. It has modules for all industries, fields, and for all departments: accounts, HR, production, they have a solution for each industry and for each department in any organization.

There are some applications that are very sensitive to the delay or the latency so for these types of applications I would recommend SAP HANA. However, if these are not concerns, there may be other database technologies that would be more cost-effective than HANA.

I would rate this solution eight out of ten.

We use this solution in conjunction with other prompted solutions primarily for real-time analytics.

The pricing on this product could be reduced, and the installation process could be more straightforward.

We have been using the solution as integrators for about five years.

The solution is stable.

I do not have any experience with customer service and support.

The initial setup is not straightforward. It took us between seven and 15 days for deployment. We have over ten people using this solution in our organization.

I am not sure about the licensing costs for this solution, but the feedback I have received is that it is expensive.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. It is a good product, but it is expensive.