SAP HANA Reviews

The memory capabilities are great.

The performance is very, very good. It's one of the best aspects of the solution.

I've used Oracle for ten years, and yet, I find SAP better than Oracle. Oracle is more cost-based.

Oracle tends to have better features than SAP HANA. They should work to add the kinds of features clients expect from Oracle.

With Oracle, you can install their cloud and that enables you to see more of the database and multiple accounts. This is better than what SAP has on offer.

SAP could really work on its monitoring capabilities.

There's data aging that needs to be dealt with on the solution. It's not ideal. You might have a lot of raw data and aging can really affect it.

It would be help if the solution had a graph database. They're lacking that right now.

There's an issue in the partition. When you record more than two million records, partitioning does not work well. In Oracle it's easy. SAP must resolve this issue in order to be more competitive with Oracle.

I've been using the solution for about five years at this point. It's been about half a decade.

The scalability of the solution is pretty good. We don't have any problems in that area.

We've dealt with technical support in the past. It wasn't that good. Sometimes the information we received from them wasn't accurate. It's a difficult solution. I would say, to be fair, that their support is better than Oracle's.

In the case of Oracle, I had an issue once with Oracle GoldenGate. It took two weeks to resolve the issue. That's far too long. SAP is much more responsive. It's never taken two weeks to resolve anything.

We also used Oracle. We find SAP to be very fast. It's much faster than Oracle.

The initial setup was five years ago, so it's been a while. However, I do recall it being straightforward. We typically install a version on Linux. While it can be difficult, at the moment, it's pretty good. Things have changed a bit, and they've improved the setup a bit. It's not really that unsimilar to Microsoft's SQL server.

We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with SAP.

We're using the latest version of the solution.

We use an on-premises version and e have a private cloud in our company.

I'd recommend the solution. If you have, for example, a huge project that's kind of a unique, scalable database I recommend SAP HANA for it. It's easy to use and handles more RAM.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

The solution is mainly for in-memory computing and past data processing, both columns or databases. It's a very good database.

The solution offers very good in-memory computing.

We can save data very easily.

It is easy to set up. The implementation process is quite straightforward for us. 

The solution is stable.

There are limitations on tables. There is a two billion record limitation on a table. We'd like it if there could be more. If a table passes two billion records, SAP goes down.

The pricing is expensive. 

I've dealt with the solution since 2012. It's been about ten years or so. We've used it for around a decade now. 

It's very stable. We've been using it for almost ten years and haven't had any issues. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is very straightforward and simple. It's not overly complex or difficult. 

It's quite a costly product. It is expensive. I'd rate it four out of five in terms of the level of expense. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. It's one of the best databases in the world. 

The dashboard is great.

It's user-friendly so long as you use it frequently.

The product is stable.

You can scale the solution.

Technical support has been good.

Some production features are lacking. For example, we cannot see any dashboards in the production department. The generation of reports needs to be better. We have sales reports and yet no production reports.

It's a complex initial setup.

It can be an expensive solution.

I've used the solution for six years.

The stability is very, very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The scalability is very good. It's very capable.

I've used technical support in the past. They are good.

I did not use a different solution. I use what my company uses in order to get reports.

The initial setup is difficult and complex. It's very complex compared to SQL, for example.

The initial deployment took 15 days, however, nowadays, it takes one or two days. Mostly, I can complete it in one day.

I'm a business consultant. I do implementations for various parts of my customers' organizations.

The licensing is typically chared yearly. It was rather expensive.

We deploy the solution mostly on-premises and sometimes on the cloud. When we use the cloud, we usually use the AWS cloud. 

I'd warn new users that it might be difficult the initial time they use it if they are changing their ERP, however,t it'll be very helpful in the future if they're using it frequently.

I'd rate the entire product an eight out of ten. There are other well-known ERPs, such as Salesforce, and companies expect to have the same features. However, not everything may be on SAP, and that's something they need to work on.

The most valuable features are the flexibility and the integration with other solutions in data quality.

HANA could be improved by adding analytics and development models in the institution.

I've been using this solution for two or three months.

The support is good and is available 24/7.

I'd rate SAP HANA as nine out of ten.

The internet of things, big data, and utilization of block chain will be possible with HANA.

It's a reliable and fast solution.

It is very stable and very innovative. You can integrate many applications with it.

The worst thing about SAP HANA is the price; it's very expensive. The licensing cost, implementation cost, hosting cost, and appliance cost are all high. 

We've been using it for three years now.

It's a cloud-based solution.

It is a very stable solution.

It's very scalable.

The technical support has been fine.

We were running SAP on Oracle, and then we switched to HANA.

If it's a new installation, it is straightforward. However, if it's a migration from one system to a new system, it's not as straightforward as you might think it would be.

We utilized around 30 technical and functional staff because we were leaving our legacy system behind and migrating to a new one. 

We pay for a maintenance license, and the licensing cost is high. In general, it is a very expensive solution.

This product covers almost everything, and it's scalable and very innovative. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate SAP HANA at nine.

We are using this solution for enterprise resource planning.

The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well.

I have been using this solution for approximately five years.

The solution is stable. I have not had any bugs or issues.

We have over 50 people using the solution in my organization.

The technical support is good.

The initial setup is straightforward.

We used an integrator for the implementation of the solution and we were satisfied.

The price is high and could be a bit cheaper.

I rate SAP HANA a six out of ten.

We are using this product for IAM.

Using this solution has given us better details for reporting and analytics.

The most valuable feature is optimization.

The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement.

I have been working with SAP HANA for between three and four years.

The stability is okay.

It scales well and we have had no trouble with it.

The technical support is good.

The deployment was straightforward.

We had assistance from an SAP partner for deployment.

The price of this product is good.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

The solution operates well. I had no problems with the functionality.

The current version we are using is lacking some unique features, we are upgrading to the newer version of this solution that has these features, S4 HANA.

I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has. We are going to continue to use the solution.

I rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.