Workday Reviews

We use Workday for recording payroll in the USA.

The most valuable feature of Workday is the ease of use which is overall user-friendly.

Workday could improve by adding other features, such as messaging to candidates and other recruiting capabilities that other new-age solutions have.

I have been using Workday for approximately two years.

There were not many issues with the stability of the solution.

I rate the stability of Workday a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable.

Our entire workforce of approximately 100,000 people is using the solution.

I rate the scalability of Workday a ten out of ten.

The support is excellent.

I rate the support from Workday a ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of Workday is simple.

I rate the initial setup of Workday an eight out of ten.

There is no maintenance required for Workday.

I would advise others to use the solution. It is a holistic tool that does not only focus on candidate experience but on team member experience, it is an end-to-end solution.

I rate Workday a ten out of ten.

I am a consultant. I configure and consult with clients who ask me about solutions, how to use products, how to help them to implement the solutions, how to improve the deployment and performance, and how to give them the solutions they need. Workday is one of the better solutions we can provide.

Workday gives us another option for providing solutions to our clients that they need for managing and improving their business practices.

The feature I think that is the most attractive is the security. But there are other features that are valuable as well, such as the BP (Business Processes) — like the social security business processes — the HCM (Human Capital Management) modeling component, Absence (for monitoring time and attendance), Payroll (for payroll processing), Financial Management (core financial management) and the Benefits module (self service employee benefits management). All of those take care of essential business needs.

In essence, I think that all areas of the product have the potential to improve even if they are good already. At the same time, from one release to the next, Workday makes the effort to improve the product. The company has two updates per year. The product is always getting better with each release. If there was anything specific that I thought of that I would improve, it would be the Benefits domain and the advanced computations.

What clients seem to respond to as being in need of attention and want to see developed for the program is apparent in the community cooperation. Workday uses the community to brainstorm and collect feedback and drive innovation. To work with brainstorming, you go to the community and you create a brainstorm (propose an idea and enhancement), and then people in the community vote on it. You get votes and rankings based on response to your ideas. I think Workday is quite proud of the large percentage (40% or so) of what comes out in their releases comes from brainstorms and client feedback. There are tons of things that people propose and say they want in the product in upcoming releases. Workday does this for the customers and suggestions do get put into the product. I've never heard of something like this being done with any other product.

There are other enhancements that go untended that have been languishing for years. I am interested in one feature now and the development just is not spending the time to fix it. They are good but they are not perfect. You can see that they are trying to meet client needs. Using that as an example, you can only put a certain task in certain BPs. Additional data can only be an action item in a few business processes like Hire, Change Job, etcetera. The idea is that users would like the option for the additional data to be available in other areas.

Another example is the default field in Questionnaires. People have asked that the field not be required as a default. Little things like this you can workaround, but it's the little things that are kind of nice. On the other hand, little things get less attention in brainstorming so they get less attention in development.

I would say that it is a very stable product. 

I think it is extremely scalable if you have the money for it. You can have 5 employees using it or you can have 300,000 employees on it all using Workday globally. Scalability isn't a problem.

The customer service is pretty responsive and there is also a pretty good community. The Workday community is a closed user community guided by Workday but mostly comprised of user contributions. There are Workday contributions, questions, guides, administrative discussions, support — all that sort of thing. Users really invest time to help each other and it is a great support system. No other product has something quite like that. The Workday technical customer support system is in addition to and above-and-beyond that. It really provides a broader opportunity to learn and contribute.

The installation is complex. There are two reasons for this. One is that you need a Workday partner to implement the setup for you. In order to be a partner, you have to have an organization or group of consultants who are trained by Workday to implement the product and support it. It is a closed environment and Workday keeps everything pretty much in check. It is complex in the fact that you have to have somebody — either Workday or a Workday partner — implement it for you.

The deployment will usually anywhere from three months to 12 months or more. It depends on the number of users or the number of modules and how complex the expectations are for the implementation. All the different flavors of how complicated an organization wants the implementation to be — all that becomes a factor in the length of the deployment.

The number of people required for maintenance on Workday varies around the same sort of desire for complexity. You usually have at least one person in-house to watch the implementation and you will have a contract with somebody to supply you with support. That might be a partner contracted for 800 hours a year or whatever the specific terms might be. Then you "lose it as you use it" or you have an ongoing maintenance contract with somebody.

Licensing costs are tiered. When you add different modules, it adds to your cost. For example, you can pay for Payroll functionality or you pay for the Benefits module. The more pieces you add, the more you pay.

I can't say what a particular company may value or see as a true return on investment. I would say that it is expensive — it is the most expensive one out there. In my opinion, you would get a clear return on investment. Different businesses would account for that in different ways.

Our clients like to look at some of the bigger names like PeopleSoft, Ceridian's Dayforce, and maybe a few other major competing products. Workday beats them all. In my opinion, they are leaps and bounds above the competition. Part of the reason is that it is built with modern technology. It has no legacy coding in it at all.

I've been in the HR/Payroll product domain for about 25 years, so I've been involved in the development of Ceridian's applications and other companies as well. I know a lot about other products and competitors.

Workday is a bit different, but I love it. You get used to it. It is like back-in-the-day when HR and the payroll system used to be the determining factor in whether you got to have a company laptop or not.

One piece of advice to anyone considering this as a solution is to implement it properly. Spend the time and do it right the first time. Don't rush the requirements, don't skip steps just to get to a stage of deployment. Do your requirements properly. Consider everything beforehand. Don't leave things till later that you should do now. It will be worth the extra time that you invest. That is really true for everyone and every implementation, but especially for Workday. Trying to go back in after the fact and change things is just really complicated and it is a real pain. Skipping steps to get it implemented is a big thing that we notice that clients do.

We have often had to go back and fix something that a client overlooked or looked past. There's always something changing, there's always something that wasn't done correctly. There's always some tweaking afterward. The more tweaking you avoid by doing it right, the less you pay to get it fixed.

After releases, 99 percent of the time it is great and it will not introduce issues. In my experience, it is really rare for issues to crop up or that those issues are so extreme that a client will have to roll an upgrade back. I find that the releases are really well-tested and well-managed. They have two releases a year and in those two releases, they are usually pretty good at getting new features out there.

On a scale from one to ten with one being the worst and ten being the best, I would rate Workday as an 8. Having had 25 years of being involved in the development of other Ceridian products, the development of some other products and having to work with PeopleSoft as a customer, Workday is right there with the best of them.

We use the platform for tasks, including applying for leaves, communication, and adhering to our organization's policies through efficient goal setting and reviews.

The platform doesn't help me in decision-making as I have used it only for basic applications, including applying for leaves and managing calendars.

They could provide a web chatbot feature in the dashboard for Workday.

We have been using Workday for eight or nine years.

I rate the product's stability a seven or eight.

We have over 2000 employees in our organization using Workday.

The product can be deployed on the cloud.

I recommend Workday to others and rate it a seven out of ten.

We install this solution for our customers to use, for capital management purposes.

We like the fact that this solution is very user-friendly, with a straightforward user interface.

We would like to see improvement in the mobile app variant of this solution. The  time sheet entry and approval, and the geo-tagging features all need to have their functionality updated, in order to be comparable with other products on the market.

We have been working with this solution for three years.

We have found this to be a stable solution during our time working with it.

We are informed bu our customers that it is an easily scalable solution.

The initial setup of this solution is very easy, and the deployment will take a maximum of one week to complete.

We would recommend this solution to organizations looking for a unifying product, as there is very little need for customization or development and it is easy to use from implementation.

We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use the product for HR purposes.

The product is easy to use and user-friendly. It saves a lot of time for onboarding processes.

There could be a web-based application for making payments to the employees.

We have been using Workday for three years. At present, we use the latest version.

The product is highly stable. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.

We have 1000 Workday users. We use it daily. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.

The initial setup was easy for me. It might be complicated for some. I rate the process a ten out of ten. 

I rate the product’s pricing a ten out of ten.

I rate Workday a ten out of ten.

It is an in-house HCM system and is currently being used by our staff across the world. We are planning to implement more features of the solution including analytics.

With other ERP tools in place, there is a lot of scope for customization with this solution. There is a lot of maintenance and we need a very huge team to maintain our ERP systems. With Workday taking everything to the cloud and taking responsibility of the customizations, introduce the workforce which we need to maintain in the organization.

The entire HCM module, specifically the recruitment process compared to other modules, is way easier to use.

The finance module of this solution is not great and needs improvement. Within the HCM space, the analytics functionality could be improved to allow us to create our own reports.

We have used this solution for two years. 

Bharat Pulikonda:
HCM is pretty good. I think they have developed really good and they have spent a lot of time. I think they have a lot of... They have sold it a lot of companies.

Bharat Pulikonda:
Scalability. I think they have already done pretty good with the HCM module, but for the ERP solutions need to enter into other areas. So if they can do that, they can be really scalable.

Bharat Pulikonda:
So it's in house, so it is 250,000 population.

Bharat Pulikonda:
They're pretty experienced. So they have done a lot of implementations like this, so they're very clear about what they're doing.

We changed from our previous solution to have top end technology which is cost efficient.

The initial setup is very straightforward. Deployment took two years but was smooth because it's a huge implementation across 32 countries. And it took us only two.

Bharat Pulikonda:
[I 00:04:51] use a third party workday implementation partner of Deloitte.

For a large organization, this product is really good. For a small organization, there are better value products in the market. Overall, this solution provides a  good user experience and is very easy to use.

The primary use case for the product in our environment is to manage the entire employee lifecycle, from recruitment to retirement.

The product's most valuable features include its intuitive user interface, seamless integration with other systems like Microsoft Outlook for calendar management, and comprehensive reporting capabilities that provide insights into workforce analytics.

They could improve the product areas such as enhancing the interview scheduling module to support more flexible online assessments within the platform. Additionally, further integration with third-party applications could broaden its functionality.

I have been using Workday for approximately three years. 

The product is stable. 

The product is scalable. 

The technical support services are excellent.

Positive

We previously used Oracle Taleo for candidate tracking but switched to Workday due to Taleo's less intuitive workflow management.

The initial setup was complex due to the need for detailed configuration and integration with existing systems. 

We took help from a vendor team for product implementation. 

We evaluated SAP SuccessFactors and ADP Workforce Now. However, Workday stood out due to its superior user experience, robust feature set, and scalability.

Overall, the product has been instrumental in modernizing our HR operations. Its training resources help us keep up with updates and new features.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

Workday is easy to use. Timesheet and resource management are also easy.

The solution has to work a lot on financial integrations, material management and CRM modules. 

I have been working with the solution for three to four years. 

Workday is scalable, and we have 40,000 users for it. 

The tool's customer support is good. 

Positive

Workday has saved us time by at least 40 per cent. 

The tool is easy to maintain and requires around two to three people. Workday is flexible, but SAP and Oracle are better regarding integration with other products and stability. I rate it a nine out of ten.