What is most valuable?
What I like about DX Unified Infrastructure Management is that it's a very good product. The feature I found most valuable in the solution is the MCS feature, which is the automatic deployment of the objects you want to monitor. You can set up a system, for example, if it's a Windows machine and I want to test specific devices on it, I could do that through DX Unified Infrastructure Management. That type of deployment is very good because it means you won't miss any monitoring aspect on any server.
What needs improvement?
I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved.
The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex.
Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive.
What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with DX Unified Infrastructure Management for a total of six or seven years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is a very stable tool.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
My team finds DX Unified Infrastructure Management scalable. It's good enough in terms of scalability.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support for DX Unified Infrastructure Management could be better because the quality of support fluctuates.
On a scale of one to five, I'm rating support a three.
Sometimes, half of the year, support is perfect, and then for some reason, in the other half of the year, support becomes less responsive and less knowledgeable.
My company asked for improvement from the support team and mentioned the areas my team is unhappy with, and now I see support for DX Unified Infrastructure Management improving again.
How was the initial setup?
I found the initial setup for DX Unified Infrastructure Management complex, but the environment in my company is rather complex. It's a complex setup for every tool, and I doubt other tools would be able to match the requirements of my company.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We'll be comparing DX Unified Infrastructure Management against another product, so we still don't know the outcome. Scalability and advanced features are the main reasons people choose DX Unified Infrastructure Management over other tools.
What other advice do I have?
I'm using the latest version of DX Unified Infrastructure Management.
Within the company of nine thousand people, about four hundred people use DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and department-wise, there's a total of sixty user accounts.
My rating for DX Unified Infrastructure Management, in general, is eight out of ten. If the price could be lower and functionality could be higher, I'd give it a ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.