Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
An easy to use product, but we would like them to add Citrix going forward to mitigate costs
Pros and Cons
  • "We are using it for scripting, and it is end user based with screen captures. It is a bit easier to use than any of the other tools out there."
  • "We looked at the Bot Store initially and didn't find much."

What is our primary use case?

It is primarily used for accounting apps. So far, it has been okay. It's for a small implementation.

We have automated account reconciliations.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is its ease of development.

It's pretty easy for people who don't have a tech background to use. It is one of the easiest tools for them to use. We are using it for scripting, and it is end user based with screen captures. It is a bit easier to use than any of the other tools out there.

What needs improvement?

There are a few things that could be done better, so we can monitor properly. They need to improve in terms of development and enhancements. We need to get the right feature sets in place as an enterprise.

We would like to use Citrix going forward. We use Bot Runners to scale up, and it gets to be expensive. Using Citrix, it can mitigate costs.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We went through the documentation, it looks pretty easy to scale.

It took six months to scale from pilot to our current number of bots.

Buyer's Guide
Automation Anywhere
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Automation Anywhere. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. The document was good. Everything went as expected.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment was done in-house.

What was our ROI?

We don't have an ROI in any of our processes. We are just trying it out now to see if it works.

We haven't had any savings yet. We have been putting more time in than saving time at this point.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Our annual licensing costs are around $100,000 a year.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We chose Automation Anywhere through a process of elimination. We evaluated all the RPA products out there and decided on Automation Anywhere mainly based on ease of use.

We also looked at Blue Prism.

What other advice do I have?

We looked at the Bot Store initially and didn't find much. We looked a year ago, so maybe we will take a look again.

I don't have much experience with attended automation.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Automati7e97 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Director, Healthcare Technology Solutions at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
We are getting massive efficiencies across our back office, internally. We are looking forward to the web-based development versions due to installation and performance issues.
Pros and Cons
  • "We are getting massive efficiencies across our back office, internally."
  • "We've had a lot of issues with the installation and performance on a variety of computers, onshore and offshore. Our network bounds multiple domains, and we've had issues there, as well. So, we are looking forward to the web-based development versions."

What is our primary use case?

We have four core business areas: Energy, financial services, healthcare, and our internal corporate. We're spread pretty evenly across the four areas.

We have automated a lot of processes serving human resources, legal, life sciences, financial services, healthcare (on the payer and provider sides), and IT. We're all over the place.

We're still in the rapid expansion phase. The last six months have really been an explosion, so we're trying to keep everything under wraps and control it.

How has it helped my organization?

We are getting massive efficiencies across our back office, internally.

What is most valuable?

Th Enterprise platform: Automation on a platform, as opposed to scattered automation.

What needs improvement?

The ease of use is improving for development. We've had a lot of issues with the installation and performance on a variety of computers, onshore and offshore. Our network bounds multiple domains, and we've had issues there, as well. So, we are looking forward to the web-based development versions.

The bot creation process is getting better. The general development process and change management deployment process is moving more towards enterprise-level and catching up with the more mature software industry around it.

So far, the cognitive document processing is not available at the enterprise level. However, this is being worked on by Automation Anywhere.

I would like them to start building continuity between employees and customer contacts.

There are a lot of new features coming with the release of version 11.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is improving.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is inconsistent. It seems like every time we call, there's someone who has only been with Automation Anywhere for a couple of months. Oftentimes, if you call two different people, you'll get two different answers, back-to-back. What we tend to do is, if we don't get a fix or resolution right away, we'll call back immediately or submit a second ticket immediately, and try to find someone else.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our business teams pushed for an RPA solution.

What about the implementation team?

We worked with Automation Anywhere on the deployment.

What was our ROI?

We have saved time and money using this solution. It varies pretty heavily by use case. We have some bots which are saving a week or month of multiple employees' times. We have some bots saving an hour a half during a day of a team of 30 people's times. So, there is some significant savings that we've uncovered.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Our annual license is somewhere in the neighborhood of $115,000.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPath, and Kryon were on our shortlist. 

At that time, Automation Anywhere was the most responsive to working with us. That actually tipped the scales.

What other advice do I have?

The more you preplan, defining processes and governance upfront, the more successful you will be down the road.

The solution integrates well with others. When it doesn't, it is usually the fault of the other solution.

The courses on Automation University were generally good.

We have not done anything with Citrix automation yet.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Automation Anywhere
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Automation Anywhere. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1864485 - PeerSpot reviewer
RPA Consultant & Developer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Business users can easily use the solution without any technical skills
Pros and Cons
  • "We have used support a few times for one of our customers, and they respond quickly. If the issue involves a critical production system, they respond to the request on the same day."
  • "Automation Anywhere should make it easier for developers to manage queues and exception handling. The OCR component could also be better. We have had to use other OCR tools to get information from the account documents."

What is our primary use case?

We only use Automation Anywhere on the RPA site because our internal Automation Anywhere customers are varied. Since Automation Anywhere doesn't have an office in Turkey, our customers there work on UiPath. We are automating some business processes based on a checklist. Automation Anywhere is also used for a few OCR projects that involve scanning documents or images and extracting the information. We can automate those jobs with RPA technology. 

What is most valuable?

Automation Anywhere is user-friendly. Business users can easily use the solution to automate tasks like sending emails without any technical skills. Of course, you need some analytical thinking skills but don't need to know how to code. All the activities are in the tool if you want to replace or manipulate the text. While UiPath requires some development skills, any business user can use Automation Anywhere. It takes about 10 to 15 days to complete one process. If it is more complex, it might take around 20 days, but it's usually around 10 days. 

You can automate any system within your environment. There are various systems that Automation Anywhere can integrate. You can use it for web, desktop, or cloud automation. There are no restrictions on what it can automate.

The training Automation Anywhere provides is excellent. Anyone can easily learn about the solution. They also have a free trial version that you can use online. If you practice daily, learning the solution takes about two or three months. 

What needs improvement?

Automation Anywhere should make it easier for developers to manage queues and exception handling.  The OCR component could also be better. We have had to use other OCR tools to get information from the account documents. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used Automation Anywhere for four years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Automation Anywhere is a professional enterprise tool that can scale to meet all our business requirements. 

How are customer service and support?

I rate Automation Anywhere support nine out of ten. We have used support a few times for one of our customers, and they respond quickly. If the issue involves a critical production system, they respond to the request on the same day. We can schedule a meeting to solve the problem together.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We also use UiPath. Implementing projects in Automation Anywhere is easier, but UiPath is more useful for DevOps. On the technical side, the two solutions are similar, but there are differences in the front end. UiPath is faster. Automation Anywhere runs a process in two seconds, but UiPath takes milliseconds. 

You can develop any process with these tools, but our Turkish customers prefer UiPath because it has an office in Turkey so that we can take support in our mother language. Both of them meet our requirements.

How was the initial setup?

Deploying Automation Anywhere is straightforward. It doesn't take much time. All of the processes need some maintenance because the processes running in the system sometimes don't work. We need to rerun the processes or change the elements. We have a 17-person team, and three of us are responsible for maintaining. The time spent maintaining bots varies. Sometimes, the issue is easy to fix, but if you need to change the flows or do some development, it may take two or three days. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate Automation Anywhere nine out of ten. It depends on your skill. I would rate it higher for non-technical users. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1541967 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
MSP
Top 20
Automation at scale is a strength, but certain types of CRM integration are challenging
Pros and Cons
  • "One thing I really like is the the recorder where you can connect with multiple systems. The OCR is also good."
  • "We only faced some problems when integrating it with SAP, and Oracle integration was a bit challenging, especially with Oracle Fusion. We had some issues when we were trying to connect some of the applications on the API level. But, in general, integration using Automation Anywhere is fine."

What is our primary use case?

Our clients use it for different things. One uses it for invoice processing and another for the aggregation of documents based on certain characters. Another uses it to automate processes for the admin department. That company has seasonal workers, and they have to create passes for those seasonal workers. Most of the document uploading and validation is done by Automation Anywhere. Most of those documents are issued by the federal government, and they have a standard format.

What is most valuable?

One thing I really like is the recorder where you can connect with multiple systems. The OCR is also good. In one case, we used a different OCR than Automation Anywhere, but in document processing, using the OCR engine is good.

And providing automation at scale is something I feel is a strength of Automation Anywhere compared to most tools. It depends on the segment we are dealing with. There are small organizations that might not need robust applications, but for mid-sized and large customers, we usually propose automation anywhere. It's quite robust, and the performance is good. When we are proposing a solution, the automation at scale makes it much easier for us, post-sales and post-implementation.

Also, the integration of the solution's bots with APIs and business applications is good. There are certain prebuilt integration APIs in Automation Anywhere. That's especially true when you're connecting with SAP. There are issues with SAP, but in general, they have connectors with most of the popular CRM tools. The API connectivity is much easier.

What needs improvement?

We only faced some problems when integrating it with SAP, and Oracle integration was a bit challenging, especially with Oracle Fusion. We had some issues when we were trying to connect some of the applications on the API level. But, in general, integration using Automation Anywhere is fine.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Automation Anywhere since 2019, or about four years.

How was the initial setup?

In the last year, the cloud has become bigger, but before that, it was implemented more on-prem only. 

From our side, the number of staff needed for an implementation depends on the number of processes we need to deploy. For the initial configuration, we may not need many people. But, for one of our customers, there are 70 processes that need to be developed over the next 18 months. Obviously, the number of people involved will be much greater than in a project where we're looking at 10 or 15 processes to be implemented. But on average, each process takes at least two to three resources, depending on the complexity.

Once you have deployed an application, you need to maintain it. Compared to other products, it takes slightly fewer people. Maintenance on the admin side requires one to two people. We always assign one FTE for this, at a minimum. Depending on other factors, we might go for two.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Automation Anywhere is more stable compared to some of the other tools on the market. And, post-implementation, we have very few issues with it compared to others. For me, it's all about post-implementation and why customers are happier with Automation Anywhere.

For small and medium-sized customers, we may not suggest Automation Anywhere because of the cost difference.

UiPath has gotten much better in the last two years. They have really grown in terms of overall performance and bot capabilities. There has been a huge improvement there.

What other advice do I have?

As for non-technical users, it's not a low-code type of solution where you draw and drag and drop. Still, it's okay, to some extent, if they at least have some understanding of technology. Generally, it's easy to learn. If you have access to Automation Anywhere University, you can really learn it. But because I am from a technology background, it was much easier for me. We give our customers 13 or 14 sessions to bring them up to speed, and that might span over the period of a month to two months.

In the discussion about RPA versus API integration, one definite advantage of automation is that scheduling, bot management, and those kinds of things are automated. It's more about the customer and their perspective. With automation, you already have something cooked up, and you don't have to worry about much at a later stage. That makes automation much easier for them than using an API integration. You have to maintain an API integration, and there is the cost of maintaining it. With all those factors, automation becomes much easier for the customer.

We have been proposing Automation Anywhere to multiple customers. It's good. It's robust. But it's a bit expensive compared to other RPA tools on the market. Sometimes, it's too heavy for customers, especially if it's on-prem. Also, maintenance is slightly higher.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
PeerSpot user
Technical Lead | WDG projects at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
Enables us to digitize processes, optimize them, and reduce time and cost involved
Pros and Cons
  • "The development tools are very good. It's very user-friendly and easy to develop and deploy with Automation Anywhere. Ordinary people, within a few weeks, can develop a bot using the tool."
  • "Their technical support is good, but it could be better."

What is our primary use case?

We have used it for many projects and many different types of companies. For example, we have used it to solve problems that companies have with backups, as well as issues of integration with legacy systems. We also use it for human resources and suppliers.

How has it helped my organization?

With Automation Anywhere, we can digitize a process, optimize it, and reduce the cost and the time that process takes. It has also reduced failures in processes.

We have used it to increase automation by 100 percent.

What is most valuable?

The development tools are very good. It's very user-friendly and easy to develop and deploy with Automation Anywhere. Ordinary people, within a few weeks, can develop a bot using the tool. It's very easy for business users, who don't have technical skills, to use.

The learning curve is low. Within two months, non-technical people can be trained to use it.

Administration of the environment of the solution is also a valuable aspect. Scheduling the bots and the Control Room are very good.

Another element that is easy is the integration of RPA bots, APIs, business applications, and documents.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Automation Anywhere for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has good stability. It's a 10 out of 10.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The platform gives you an environment that you can easily scale within your company. The scalability is a nine out of 10.

How are customer service and support?

Their technical support is good, but it could be better.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used another RPA solution.

What was our ROI?

ROI is very good. We measure processes that we automate and calculate the reduced cost.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's the best RPA tool, but the pricing could be improved.

What other advice do I have?

Whether to use an API integration or an RPA solution depends on the use case. If there is a possibility of using an API integration, it could be better because the integration can be more secure. But if you have a legacy system where API integration is not possible you can use Automation Anywhere. It also depends on the expectations of the customer. Sometimes, the implementation via Automation Anywhere can be faster. If the customer doesn't have a lot of time and you need to deliver the solution, RPA could be the best solution.

And Automation Anywhere doesn't require any maintenance.

Automation Anywhere is one of the best tools on the market. It's a little expensive but if you implement it in your company, you should see return on investment.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Madan-Divvela - PeerSpot reviewer
SGO - IA Practice Leader (RPA, IPA, AI, ML), Data Science at Zensar Technologies
Real User
Feature-rich, useful, and simple to install
Pros and Cons
  • "Automation Anywhere has a uniqueness with respect to the IQ Bot."
  • "The overall product in Automation Anywhere is good, but they need to improve a little bit on the overall architecture side."
  • "Integrations should be included with the analytics platforms and third-party SAP, enterprise-level applications, as well as if there are any built-in connectors where you can connect with the ERPs to automate the required teams."

What is our primary use case?

Parts of Automation Anywhere (AA) that we are using include IQ BOT, RPA products, and a human in the loop attended Bots as well.

What is most valuable?

Automation Anywhere (AA) is useful for our customers.

Automation Anywhere IQ Bot is very strong in comparison to other vendors because Automation introduced this intelligent document processing product a long time ago, which is one of its unique features. 

When compared to UiPath and Blue Prism, the rest of the products are the same. They are distinct in comparison to the IQ Bot, but other than that, they share many of the same features as other products.

Automation Anywhere has a uniqueness with respect to the IQ Bot.

What needs improvement?

There is room for improvement; with the overall architecture as it is tightly coupled. Everything is coupled with the Control Room of the overall product architecture.

When I look at the UiPath product, where they have a mostly combined architecture and development environments. It should be more loosely coupled, but both products have advantages and disadvantages. 

The overall product in Automation Anywhere is good, but they need to improve a little bit on the overall architecture side.

Integrations should be included with the analytics platforms and third-party SAP, enterprise-level applications, as well as if there are any built-in connectors where you can connect with the ERPs to automate the required teams. 

There are ready-made connectors available, which will help to democratize automation across the enterprise with various customers across the globe.

They should include integration with not only analytics but also analytics and enterprise applications, as well as advanced AI/ML features. It's not just about the IdP; some AI/ML features should be available. Aside from computer vision, NLP, NLU, and NLG, as well as a variety of other advanced features, should be included.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Automation Anywhere (AA) for six years.

For the last two years, Automation Anywhere (AA) has been deployed on the cloud, and prior to that, it was on-premises.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There are several versions of Automation Anywhere. They have version 11, as well as Automation 360 and Enterprise 360.

Version 11 is considered stable. You will also notice that Automation 360 is attempting to stabilize the overall product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Automation Anywhere's cloud version is excellent, but the on-premise version is a waste of time and money.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I'm familiar with both Automation Anywhere (AA) and UiPath.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup, after cloud, is fine. It was complicated earlier, but it's fine now. When you sign up for a cloud subscription, then it's plug and play, but it's a little more complicated in the case of on-premises.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I compared Automation Anywhere to UiPath and Blue Prism.

What other advice do I have?

We are resale local partners.

I would rate Automation Anywhere (AA) an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1469046 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deputy Manager - Automation, Business Transformation at a performing arts with 10,001+ employees
Real User
The option to use the Python Script has been very helpful
Pros and Cons
  • "There are many features of Automation Anywhere that were found to be most valuable like WLM, PDF integration, Advanced Excel Commands, Terminal Emulator and its commands, Interactive Forms building features of A2019 which helped us in developing UI for our front office automation and integrate it with multiple rest APIs."
  • "We noticed slowness in a few of the commands like Object Cloning, Web Recorders, etc. on which Automation Anywhere can work to make it more robust. There are improvements required in the WLM solution provided by AA, which can make it a more robust queuing system and the system should retry by itself in case of failure due to system error."

What is our primary use case?

We used AA for all of our healthcare clients for multiple use cases. We have automated most manual steps of Claim Adjudication, Claim Pre-Work Validation, Overpayment Recovery, Triaging, Quoting Census, etc.

In the front office side, we have automated Provider Calls as attended solution which helps Agents to take calls hassle-free while Bots gather the required information from multiple applications. We have automated KFI process where AA OCR identifies the CMS1500 form run it through IQ BOT and further post it on the target application.  

How has it helped my organization?

By automating most of our LOB's on the healthcare side and putting it on production, we have saved millions of dollars and were also able to achieve FTE benefits. It has improved our quality, AHT, and was also able to achieve target TAT and SLA. 

We have successfully processed 10 million claims through unattended BOTs. We also saw significant improvement in Agent performance for provider calls where we deployed attended Bots. Overall, Automation Anywhere has been great for us and helped us in generating revenue as well. We had recognized by Automation Anywhere as Innovation Partner of the Year - 2020 in Payer Segment which helps us in selling our solutions to new healthcare clients.   

What is most valuable?

There are many features of Automation Anywhere that were found to be most valuable like WLM, PDF integration, Advanced Excel Commands, Terminal Emulator and its commands, Interactive Forms building features of A2019 which helped us in developing UI for our front office automation and integrate it with multiple rest APIs. The new features which were introduced in A2019 like Data Table, custom DLL, IBM Watson Speech to Text, IQ BOT, Document Extractor has been impressive. The option to use the Python Script has been very helpful.

What needs improvement?

We noticed slowness in a few of the commands like Object Cloning, Web Recorders, etc. on which Automation Anywhere can work to make it more robust. There are improvements required in the WLM solution provided by AA, which can make it a more robust queuing system and the system should retry by itself in case of failure due to system error. There should be the option of selecting credentials by passing variables and not just limit it to selection. Retry mechanism should be included in Enterprise 11.x version which helps developers to reduce the number of lines of code.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AA for 4.5 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Whatever product they launch they make sure that it is 99.9% stable. The stability of this solution is pretty high.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable for sure and has the capability of becoming the world's number one RPA tool.

How are customer service and technical support?

It was nice interacting with CS/tech support. Most of the time they resolves issues within 24 hours.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before AA, we tried a few other RPA tools but those have few challenges in terms of security and interaction feasibility after the AA worked for us nicely.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward and does not necessarily requires technical knowledge.

What about the implementation team?

In our case it was both. The level of expertise was 9 out of 10

What was our ROI?

We saved millions of dollars and had FTE benefits.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing model and cost are very impressive. Now, you do not have to worry about infra setup cost like Server, Database as it comes free of cost with the A2019 cloud version.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated BP, UiPath, Pega,  etc.

What other advice do I have?

One word for Automation Anywhere keeps shining and helps your customers/partners to automate & gain more.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: HGS is a Premium Partner of Automation Anywhere and have collaborated to resolve/automate our processes.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1465482 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior RPA consultant at RPATech
Real User
Integrates DLL files with meta bot, enabling developers to use DLL files to connect to applications
Pros and Cons
  • "Automation Anywhere offers the capability of integrating the DLL files with meta bot and hence the developer can use DLL files to connect to applications likes outlook, SAP, etc"
  • "Automation Anywhere can include database commands like insert row, bold row, etc commands in 11.x"

What is our primary use case?

The primary use of this tool is to automate the business process end to end for different finance towers. We have automated the following processes end to end with the help of Automation Anywhere:

R2R: In the R2R tower we have automated the process of uploading the backup files in SAP.

Manually it took around 7 working days to upload 10k documents to SAP.

With the help of Automation Anywhere, we are able to upload 10k documents in 1 4 working hours which is a great achievement for us.

We managed to save 5 FTE by automating this business process.

How has it helped my organization?

  • Automation Anywhere has helped my organization to automate the complex process which usually takes 7-8 FTE and lots of human effort in repetitive tasks/processes.
  • We have developed a bot that would automate the process of calculating the KPI of a P2P finance tower which would usually take 8 hours for each FTE to present the KPI.
  • The bot takes usually 2-3 hours to represent the KPI across all regions for the P2P tower.
  • The benefits are so great that the organization is saving the effort of 7 FTE from this project.

What is most valuable?

The following features are best in the Automation Anywhere tool:

Automation Anywhere offers the capability of integrating the DLL files with meta bot and hence the developer can use DLL files to connect to applications likes Outlook, SAP, etc.

Automation Anywhere offers the best tool in the market for extracting information from PDF and is called IQ bot. IQ bot is built on machine learning and natural language processing. It helps users to create layouts for the pdf and then process the similar format pdf in one go.

What needs improvement?

Automation Anywhere is the best automating tool on the market and it's very difficult for me to think to suggest something to improve the tool.

Here are my few suggestions:

Automation Anywhere can include database commands like insert row, bold row, etc commands in 11.x

They can also include features like API integration features in the command panel.

They should create a standard framework like re framework in Ui Path.

As it enhances the capability of the developer to create an automation project.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the Automation Anywhere tool for more than 2.5 years.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Automation Anywhere Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Automation Anywhere Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.