It is primarily used for accounting apps. So far, it has been okay. It's for a small implementation.
We have automated account reconciliations.
It is primarily used for accounting apps. So far, it has been okay. It's for a small implementation.
We have automated account reconciliations.
The most valuable feature is its ease of development.
It's pretty easy for people who don't have a tech background to use. It is one of the easiest tools for them to use. We are using it for scripting, and it is end user based with screen captures. It is a bit easier to use than any of the other tools out there.
There are a few things that could be done better, so we can monitor properly. They need to improve in terms of development and enhancements. We need to get the right feature sets in place as an enterprise.
We would like to use Citrix going forward. We use Bot Runners to scale up, and it gets to be expensive. Using Citrix, it can mitigate costs.
We went through the documentation, it looks pretty easy to scale.
It took six months to scale from pilot to our current number of bots.
The technical support is good.
The initial setup was pretty straightforward. The document was good. Everything went as expected.
The deployment was done in-house.
We don't have an ROI in any of our processes. We are just trying it out now to see if it works.
We haven't had any savings yet. We have been putting more time in than saving time at this point.
Our annual licensing costs are around $100,000 a year.
We chose Automation Anywhere through a process of elimination. We evaluated all the RPA products out there and decided on Automation Anywhere mainly based on ease of use.
We also looked at Blue Prism.
We looked at the Bot Store initially and didn't find much. We looked a year ago, so maybe we will take a look again.
I don't have much experience with attended automation.
We have four core business areas: Energy, financial services, healthcare, and our internal corporate. We're spread pretty evenly across the four areas.
We have automated a lot of processes serving human resources, legal, life sciences, financial services, healthcare (on the payer and provider sides), and IT. We're all over the place.
We're still in the rapid expansion phase. The last six months have really been an explosion, so we're trying to keep everything under wraps and control it.
We are getting massive efficiencies across our back office, internally.
Th Enterprise platform: Automation on a platform, as opposed to scattered automation.
The ease of use is improving for development. We've had a lot of issues with the installation and performance on a variety of computers, onshore and offshore. Our network bounds multiple domains, and we've had issues there, as well. So, we are looking forward to the web-based development versions.
The bot creation process is getting better. The general development process and change management deployment process is moving more towards enterprise-level and catching up with the more mature software industry around it.
So far, the cognitive document processing is not available at the enterprise level. However, this is being worked on by Automation Anywhere.
I would like them to start building continuity between employees and customer contacts.
There are a lot of new features coming with the release of version 11.
The stability is improving.
The technical support is inconsistent. It seems like every time we call, there's someone who has only been with Automation Anywhere for a couple of months. Oftentimes, if you call two different people, you'll get two different answers, back-to-back. What we tend to do is, if we don't get a fix or resolution right away, we'll call back immediately or submit a second ticket immediately, and try to find someone else.
Our business teams pushed for an RPA solution.
We worked with Automation Anywhere on the deployment.
We have saved time and money using this solution. It varies pretty heavily by use case. We have some bots which are saving a week or month of multiple employees' times. We have some bots saving an hour a half during a day of a team of 30 people's times. So, there is some significant savings that we've uncovered.
Our annual license is somewhere in the neighborhood of $115,000.
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPath, and Kryon were on our shortlist.
At that time, Automation Anywhere was the most responsive to working with us. That actually tipped the scales.
The more you preplan, defining processes and governance upfront, the more successful you will be down the road.
The solution integrates well with others. When it doesn't, it is usually the fault of the other solution.
The courses on Automation University were generally good.
We have not done anything with Citrix automation yet.
We only use Automation Anywhere on the RPA site because our internal Automation Anywhere customers are varied. Since Automation Anywhere doesn't have an office in Turkey, our customers there work on UiPath. We are automating some business processes based on a checklist. Automation Anywhere is also used for a few OCR projects that involve scanning documents or images and extracting the information. We can automate those jobs with RPA technology.
Automation Anywhere is user-friendly. Business users can easily use the solution to automate tasks like sending emails without any technical skills. Of course, you need some analytical thinking skills but don't need to know how to code. All the activities are in the tool if you want to replace or manipulate the text. While UiPath requires some development skills, any business user can use Automation Anywhere. It takes about 10 to 15 days to complete one process. If it is more complex, it might take around 20 days, but it's usually around 10 days.
You can automate any system within your environment. There are various systems that Automation Anywhere can integrate. You can use it for web, desktop, or cloud automation. There are no restrictions on what it can automate.
The training Automation Anywhere provides is excellent. Anyone can easily learn about the solution. They also have a free trial version that you can use online. If you practice daily, learning the solution takes about two or three months.
Automation Anywhere should make it easier for developers to manage queues and exception handling. The OCR component could also be better. We have had to use other OCR tools to get information from the account documents.
I have used Automation Anywhere for four years.
Automation Anywhere is a professional enterprise tool that can scale to meet all our business requirements.
I rate Automation Anywhere support nine out of ten. We have used support a few times for one of our customers, and they respond quickly. If the issue involves a critical production system, they respond to the request on the same day. We can schedule a meeting to solve the problem together.
Positive
We also use UiPath. Implementing projects in Automation Anywhere is easier, but UiPath is more useful for DevOps. On the technical side, the two solutions are similar, but there are differences in the front end. UiPath is faster. Automation Anywhere runs a process in two seconds, but UiPath takes milliseconds.
You can develop any process with these tools, but our Turkish customers prefer UiPath because it has an office in Turkey so that we can take support in our mother language. Both of them meet our requirements.
Deploying Automation Anywhere is straightforward. It doesn't take much time. All of the processes need some maintenance because the processes running in the system sometimes don't work. We need to rerun the processes or change the elements. We have a 17-person team, and three of us are responsible for maintaining. The time spent maintaining bots varies. Sometimes, the issue is easy to fix, but if you need to change the flows or do some development, it may take two or three days.
I rate Automation Anywhere nine out of ten. It depends on your skill. I would rate it higher for non-technical users.
Our clients use it for different things. One uses it for invoice processing and another for the aggregation of documents based on certain characters. Another uses it to automate processes for the admin department. That company has seasonal workers, and they have to create passes for those seasonal workers. Most of the document uploading and validation is done by Automation Anywhere. Most of those documents are issued by the federal government, and they have a standard format.
One thing I really like is the recorder where you can connect with multiple systems. The OCR is also good. In one case, we used a different OCR than Automation Anywhere, but in document processing, using the OCR engine is good.
And providing automation at scale is something I feel is a strength of Automation Anywhere compared to most tools. It depends on the segment we are dealing with. There are small organizations that might not need robust applications, but for mid-sized and large customers, we usually propose automation anywhere. It's quite robust, and the performance is good. When we are proposing a solution, the automation at scale makes it much easier for us, post-sales and post-implementation.
Also, the integration of the solution's bots with APIs and business applications is good. There are certain prebuilt integration APIs in Automation Anywhere. That's especially true when you're connecting with SAP. There are issues with SAP, but in general, they have connectors with most of the popular CRM tools. The API connectivity is much easier.
We only faced some problems when integrating it with SAP, and Oracle integration was a bit challenging, especially with Oracle Fusion. We had some issues when we were trying to connect some of the applications on the API level. But, in general, integration using Automation Anywhere is fine.
I have been working with Automation Anywhere since 2019, or about four years.
In the last year, the cloud has become bigger, but before that, it was implemented more on-prem only.
From our side, the number of staff needed for an implementation depends on the number of processes we need to deploy. For the initial configuration, we may not need many people. But, for one of our customers, there are 70 processes that need to be developed over the next 18 months. Obviously, the number of people involved will be much greater than in a project where we're looking at 10 or 15 processes to be implemented. But on average, each process takes at least two to three resources, depending on the complexity.
Once you have deployed an application, you need to maintain it. Compared to other products, it takes slightly fewer people. Maintenance on the admin side requires one to two people. We always assign one FTE for this, at a minimum. Depending on other factors, we might go for two.
Automation Anywhere is more stable compared to some of the other tools on the market. And, post-implementation, we have very few issues with it compared to others. For me, it's all about post-implementation and why customers are happier with Automation Anywhere.
For small and medium-sized customers, we may not suggest Automation Anywhere because of the cost difference.
UiPath has gotten much better in the last two years. They have really grown in terms of overall performance and bot capabilities. There has been a huge improvement there.
As for non-technical users, it's not a low-code type of solution where you draw and drag and drop. Still, it's okay, to some extent, if they at least have some understanding of technology. Generally, it's easy to learn. If you have access to Automation Anywhere University, you can really learn it. But because I am from a technology background, it was much easier for me. We give our customers 13 or 14 sessions to bring them up to speed, and that might span over the period of a month to two months.
In the discussion about RPA versus API integration, one definite advantage of automation is that scheduling, bot management, and those kinds of things are automated. It's more about the customer and their perspective. With automation, you already have something cooked up, and you don't have to worry about much at a later stage. That makes automation much easier for them than using an API integration. You have to maintain an API integration, and there is the cost of maintaining it. With all those factors, automation becomes much easier for the customer.
We have been proposing Automation Anywhere to multiple customers. It's good. It's robust. But it's a bit expensive compared to other RPA tools on the market. Sometimes, it's too heavy for customers, especially if it's on-prem. Also, maintenance is slightly higher.
We have used it for many projects and many different types of companies. For example, we have used it to solve problems that companies have with backups, as well as issues of integration with legacy systems. We also use it for human resources and suppliers.
With Automation Anywhere, we can digitize a process, optimize it, and reduce the cost and the time that process takes. It has also reduced failures in processes.
We have used it to increase automation by 100 percent.
The development tools are very good. It's very user-friendly and easy to develop and deploy with Automation Anywhere. Ordinary people, within a few weeks, can develop a bot using the tool. It's very easy for business users, who don't have technical skills, to use.
The learning curve is low. Within two months, non-technical people can be trained to use it.
Administration of the environment of the solution is also a valuable aspect. Scheduling the bots and the Control Room are very good.
Another element that is easy is the integration of RPA bots, APIs, business applications, and documents.
I have been using Automation Anywhere for four years.
It has good stability. It's a 10 out of 10.
The platform gives you an environment that you can easily scale within your company. The scalability is a nine out of 10.
Their technical support is good, but it could be better.
Positive
I have not used another RPA solution.
ROI is very good. We measure processes that we automate and calculate the reduced cost.
It's the best RPA tool, but the pricing could be improved.
Whether to use an API integration or an RPA solution depends on the use case. If there is a possibility of using an API integration, it could be better because the integration can be more secure. But if you have a legacy system where API integration is not possible you can use Automation Anywhere. It also depends on the expectations of the customer. Sometimes, the implementation via Automation Anywhere can be faster. If the customer doesn't have a lot of time and you need to deliver the solution, RPA could be the best solution.
And Automation Anywhere doesn't require any maintenance.
Automation Anywhere is one of the best tools on the market. It's a little expensive but if you implement it in your company, you should see return on investment.
Parts of Automation Anywhere (AA) that we are using include IQ BOT, RPA products, and a human in the loop attended Bots as well.
Automation Anywhere (AA) is useful for our customers.
Automation Anywhere IQ Bot is very strong in comparison to other vendors because Automation introduced this intelligent document processing product a long time ago, which is one of its unique features.
When compared to UiPath and Blue Prism, the rest of the products are the same. They are distinct in comparison to the IQ Bot, but other than that, they share many of the same features as other products.
Automation Anywhere has a uniqueness with respect to the IQ Bot.
There is room for improvement; with the overall architecture as it is tightly coupled. Everything is coupled with the Control Room of the overall product architecture.
When I look at the UiPath product, where they have a mostly combined architecture and development environments. It should be more loosely coupled, but both products have advantages and disadvantages.
The overall product in Automation Anywhere is good, but they need to improve a little bit on the overall architecture side.
Integrations should be included with the analytics platforms and third-party SAP, enterprise-level applications, as well as if there are any built-in connectors where you can connect with the ERPs to automate the required teams.
There are ready-made connectors available, which will help to democratize automation across the enterprise with various customers across the globe.
They should include integration with not only analytics but also analytics and enterprise applications, as well as advanced AI/ML features. It's not just about the IdP; some AI/ML features should be available. Aside from computer vision, NLP, NLU, and NLG, as well as a variety of other advanced features, should be included.
I have been working with Automation Anywhere (AA) for six years.
For the last two years, Automation Anywhere (AA) has been deployed on the cloud, and prior to that, it was on-premises.
There are several versions of Automation Anywhere. They have version 11, as well as Automation 360 and Enterprise 360.
Version 11 is considered stable. You will also notice that Automation 360 is attempting to stabilize the overall product.
The scalability of Automation Anywhere's cloud version is excellent, but the on-premise version is a waste of time and money.
I'm familiar with both Automation Anywhere (AA) and UiPath.
Initial setup, after cloud, is fine. It was complicated earlier, but it's fine now. When you sign up for a cloud subscription, then it's plug and play, but it's a little more complicated in the case of on-premises.
I compared Automation Anywhere to UiPath and Blue Prism.
We are resale local partners.
I would rate Automation Anywhere (AA) an eight out of ten.
We used AA for all of our healthcare clients for multiple use cases. We have automated most manual steps of Claim Adjudication, Claim Pre-Work Validation, Overpayment Recovery, Triaging, Quoting Census, etc.
In the front office side, we have automated Provider Calls as attended solution which helps Agents to take calls hassle-free while Bots gather the required information from multiple applications. We have automated KFI process where AA OCR identifies the CMS1500 form run it through IQ BOT and further post it on the target application.
By automating most of our LOB's on the healthcare side and putting it on production, we have saved millions of dollars and were also able to achieve FTE benefits. It has improved our quality, AHT, and was also able to achieve target TAT and SLA.
We have successfully processed 10 million claims through unattended BOTs. We also saw significant improvement in Agent performance for provider calls where we deployed attended Bots. Overall, Automation Anywhere has been great for us and helped us in generating revenue as well. We had recognized by Automation Anywhere as Innovation Partner of the Year - 2020 in Payer Segment which helps us in selling our solutions to new healthcare clients.
There are many features of Automation Anywhere that were found to be most valuable like WLM, PDF integration, Advanced Excel Commands, Terminal Emulator and its commands, Interactive Forms building features of A2019 which helped us in developing UI for our front office automation and integrate it with multiple rest APIs. The new features which were introduced in A2019 like Data Table, custom DLL, IBM Watson Speech to Text, IQ BOT, Document Extractor has been impressive. The option to use the Python Script has been very helpful.
We noticed slowness in a few of the commands like Object Cloning, Web Recorders, etc. on which Automation Anywhere can work to make it more robust. There are improvements required in the WLM solution provided by AA, which can make it a more robust queuing system and the system should retry by itself in case of failure due to system error. There should be the option of selecting credentials by passing variables and not just limit it to selection. Retry mechanism should be included in Enterprise 11.x version which helps developers to reduce the number of lines of code.
I have been using AA for 4.5 years.
Whatever product they launch they make sure that it is 99.9% stable. The stability of this solution is pretty high.
It is scalable for sure and has the capability of becoming the world's number one RPA tool.
It was nice interacting with CS/tech support. Most of the time they resolves issues within 24 hours.
Before AA, we tried a few other RPA tools but those have few challenges in terms of security and interaction feasibility after the AA worked for us nicely.
The initial setup is straightforward and does not necessarily requires technical knowledge.
In our case it was both. The level of expertise was 9 out of 10
We saved millions of dollars and had FTE benefits.
The licensing model and cost are very impressive. Now, you do not have to worry about infra setup cost like Server, Database as it comes free of cost with the A2019 cloud version.
We evaluated BP, UiPath, Pega, etc.
One word for Automation Anywhere keeps shining and helps your customers/partners to automate & gain more.
The primary use of this tool is to automate the business process end to end for different finance towers. We have automated the following processes end to end with the help of Automation Anywhere:
R2R: In the R2R tower we have automated the process of uploading the backup files in SAP.
Manually it took around 7 working days to upload 10k documents to SAP.
With the help of Automation Anywhere, we are able to upload 10k documents in 1 4 working hours which is a great achievement for us.
We managed to save 5 FTE by automating this business process.
The following features are best in the Automation Anywhere tool:
Automation Anywhere offers the capability of integrating the DLL files with meta bot and hence the developer can use DLL files to connect to applications likes Outlook, SAP, etc.
Automation Anywhere offers the best tool in the market for extracting information from PDF and is called IQ bot. IQ bot is built on machine learning and natural language processing. It helps users to create layouts for the pdf and then process the similar format pdf in one go.
Automation Anywhere is the best automating tool on the market and it's very difficult for me to think to suggest something to improve the tool.
Here are my few suggestions:
Automation Anywhere can include database commands like insert row, bold row, etc commands in 11.x
They can also include features like API integration features in the command panel.
They should create a standard framework like re framework in Ui Path.
As it enhances the capability of the developer to create an automation project.
I have been using the Automation Anywhere tool for more than 2.5 years.