Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1361055 - PeerSpot reviewer
DPKO at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good stability and very good documentation but very expensive
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution offers very good stability."
  • "The new GUI interface and the newer version OS are a little bit more complex than the older version, however, it just might take some getting used to."

What is most valuable?

The ability to do mesh and bridge is the solution's most valuable aspect.

The multiple VLANs and their wireless LANs are great. 

The solution offers very good stability.

What needs improvement?

The new GUI interface and the newer version OS are a little bit more complex than the older version, however, it just might take some getting used to.

There's room for improvement when it comes to setting up 802.1 authentications, their user authentication with the AAA. It's too difficult and not intuitive.

The solution is extremely expensive.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using Cisco for a number of years. It's likely been seven or eight years since we started using it. It's been quite a while.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We don't have issues with stability. It's been quite reliable for us. We don't have issues with bugs or glitches and it doesn't seem to crash or freeze. We've had a good experience with it overall.

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable, however, it becomes expensive. Organizations should keep that in mind if they are searching for a solution that can expand in the future.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's online documentation is very good. There are always answers somewhere in the forums as well, so you can go there in order to find the answers to the questions you might have on how to troubleshoot or use the product.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We're actually doing a test with Aruba Wireless right now. We want to use both. THe POC has been going on for one month.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Cisco has changed their licensing mode and they've become very expensive.

What other advice do I have?

We are a customer and end-user. We don't have a business relationship with Cisco.

As a product itself, I would rate it around an eight or nine out of ten, however, due to the fact that it's so expensive, I'd knock off a few points. Therefore, on a scale from one to ten with all things considered, I'd rate it at a six. If money were not an object, I would highly recommend the solution.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Senior Network Engineer at a museum or institution with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
A stable and easy-to-manage solution with a straightforward initial setup
Pros and Cons
  • "The product is easy to manage."
  • "Sometimes our customers do not get proper IP addresses from the DHCP pool."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution to broadcast SSIDs. We have around 40 SSIDs with 150 access points across our organization.

What is most valuable?

The product is easy to manage. It is easy to create SSIDs and add access points to wireless controllers.

What needs improvement?

Sometimes our customers do not get proper IP addresses from the DHCP pool.

Clients should see our organization’s pop-up page when they connect to our SSID.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product has been stable for the last two years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Two people in my organization use the product.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is quite easy for me because I have experience using the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is a little expensive compared to other brands.

What other advice do I have?

Cisco is one of the main products in our region. People who want a solution with flexibility and security should choose Cisco. Overall, I rate the product an eight and a half out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Wireless
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Head Of Architecture Department at a university with 51-200 employees
Real User
High speed connectivity combined with 100% reliable hardware
Pros and Cons
  • "The features that I have found most valuable with Cisco Wireless is that the average connectivity for this WIFI access point is 2.5 gigabytes. That's the highest technology and highest connectivity. They started using the new technology and WIFI to get you a faster connectivity."
  • "In the next release, they should add a better reporting feature. The reporting will tell you if you have a problem. That will make the diagnostics easier."

What is our primary use case?

I use Cisco Wireless for education as I am managing a school. We use it for connectivity for students and teachers. It is an international private school. This is why we have to get high speed connectivity.

How has it helped my organization?

I have not used the solution for enough time to give a full evaluation but I will tell you the estimate - I estimate that it will reduce the time for a student to do their work and reduce the time for copying and transferring data through the local network. That's the reason that what we needed to get this hardware.

What is most valuable?

The features that I have found most valuable with Cisco Wireless is that the average connectivity for this WIFI access point is 2.5 gigabytes. That's the highest technology and highest connectivity. They started using the new technology and WIFI to get you a faster connectivity. All companies jumped from Wave 2 to WIFI 6 for the high speed.

What needs improvement?

I selected Cisco Wireless because I found they improved everything, but there is still a gap in Cisco reporting. It did not invest more into giving accurate reports. That's the missing thing in the solution. 

In the next release, they should add a better reporting feature. The reporting will tell you if you have a problem. That will make the diagnostics easier. Although, we have not had problems that required a lot of diagnostics.

For how long have I used the solution?

I just implemented the Cisco Wireless WiFi 6 last weekend.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would be liar if I answered if it is stable because it has only been up for two days.

But the Cisco solution overall, and Cisco Wireless generally, are 100% stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable. We have around 2000 students and teachers using it because we are an educational institution.

I'm the IT manager. My role as IT manager is managing the whole technology results.

We require three staff people for deployment and maintenance of Cisco Wireless - a network administrator and two IT specialists.

How are customer service and support?

They are good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have been using the Cisco solution since 2011.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup right now of the access points to the WIFI, and to the switches are managed by FortiGate firewall and the wireless controller. So the routing is through the FortiGate firewall and the activity is through the Cisco switches managed through the wireless controller.

The plan was to upgrade the firewall and remove the old non-supported access point from the system because I used hybrid between these two and WIFI 6. Because this hardware is very expensive to get all at one time, we have a plan to replace all access points for these.

The development takes three days. But the delivery takes a long time. They take a lot of time to deliver hardware. 

What about the implementation team?

We implemented with a Cisco partner. They were experts. They did all they were supposed to do and it was active within the time as planned.

What was our ROI?

Two days is not enough to see ROI.

But for the previous experience, yes, I can see ROI. The old access points stayed with us since 2015. I have some working since 2017. I removed some from the system, so I have all 2017 access points still working. That is quite a reliable system.

What other advice do I have?

Any people who are looking to get a stable solution with and long life and long time connectivity should go with Cisco.

The big lesson is that when you invest in expensive hardware, you have to understand that it should be a trusted hardware to give you stability and to make sure that your investment will be returned soon. The cost of implementation and downtime with Cisco are less than with other solutions.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Cisco Wireless a nine.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer934653 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mgr - Applications Enterprise Applications at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Stable and easy to use
Pros and Cons
  • "For me, the most valuable thing about Cisco Wireless is its ease of use and stability."
  • "It's very scalable, but when you shift gears sometimes, you have to do more work than people anticipate."

What is our primary use case?

We're using Cisco Wireless for patient tracking or infant abduction and security — for securing the floor and our infant patients. Cisco is also used for device management, such as IV pumps and other small but significant pieces of equipment that we need to track. We're also using it for temperature monitoring in the refrigerators for drugs and things that must be kept at a specific temperature. We use Cisco Wireless for patients' access and any wireless cart, whether it's a PC or an EKG machine. And we have different channels for stuff in the health network and the staff network versus what is publicly open for the patients and family.

What is most valuable?

For me, the most valuable thing about Cisco Wireless is its ease of use and stability. 

What needs improvement?

The biggest pain point has been keeping our people and the vendor up to speed on the technology. It's getting our staff to understand that opening up a laptop and connecting to the WLAN is not the same as triangulating and trying to figure out where an IV pump is. So when you're trying to use the real-time location services, I think it's that shift from your density and your overlap. For example, you used to be able to stick an access point up if something was a little weak in an area. Now, if you stick that access point up, you might have too much coverage in that area, which is as bad as too little coverage. I think it's hard for everybody to get their heads around that. It's not just the vendor—it's also the customers. And how do we continue to partner and ensure that we're all going together as the technology changes.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been dealing with Cisco for 15 years or thereabouts.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability's good. I'm not saying we don't end up with something flakey every once in a while, but it's not often at all.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Cisco Wireless seems to be pretty scalable. But, again, they do an excellent job of saying exactly what the coverage will be. And so we have to make sure that when someone wants to add things they understand what it means. Do I have to resurvey that whole area? Because they'll say, it was just wired for wireless access, not location tracking. So now I've got to go in and check my density and things like that. It's very scalable, but when you shift gears sometimes, you have to do more work than people anticipate.

How are customer service and support?

Cisco support is good, but I think it could be better. Their collaboration with their partners is probably the biggest challenge I've had. If I have an issue with an application that runs off the Cisco network and Cisco has to work with their partner to resolve it, that gets a little hanky sometimes.

How was the initial setup?

We've been using the initial one, but we've swapped it out since then, and it's been relatively painless. And when we've expanded, the new buildings get new wireless. And when we've bought new hospitals, they get new wireless. So you've got the stuff that's been in there for a long time, and you've got the stuff that hasn't been there for long at all. So we have a routine for what to do when we've got a new building.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don't know the details about the pricing. Typically it just gets lumped into my project. So I'm not sure what we're paying in licensing fees. 

What other advice do I have?

I'd give Cisco Wireless an eight out of 10. I don't know what to compare it to, but I'm hesitant to give anybody a 10. I'd give them an eight. If you are considering Cisco Wireless, I suggest looking at the total cost of ownership. This stuff doesn't last forever. So when you put it in the ceiling, when will you need to replace it? It's not a one-time investment. And then what is it going to take to get it there? Because sometimes you may end up with the impact you have every time. Hospitals are constantly renovating. Depending on what you need wireless for, you may have to spend tens of thousands re-surveying and repositioning your access points to optimize if you remodel an area. You may have thought, "Oh, I already have wireless in there. Just because I'm moving these three or four walls doesn't mean..." Well, it does mean something. The total cost of ownership matters. Make sure remediations are built into your capital budget if you're doing construction.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Group IT Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Good connectivity and cross-customization make it user friendly and accessible
Pros and Cons
  • "Good connectivity and easy to configure."
  • "Controllers could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We are customers of Cisco and I'm an enterprise architect. 

What is most valuable?

I like the connectivity of this solution. We have a pretty good team working on the product. They are quick and the solution is fairly easy to configure. Customization is not a problem because all products can be customized or cross-customized. 

What needs improvement?

I would like to see an improvement in the controllers of the solution. I would ideally like to have software defined WiFi as an additional feature, everything connected with LVMs, so basically to define networking; ADPs which would define the perimeter and a combination of PSDN and WAN, etc. I would also like to see the use of the PE market and functions. Authentication and authorization processes for guest users would also be a good additional feature. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with Cisco for over five years. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is extremely scalable. If we're talking about any solution that has a cloud-based infrastructure, I assume it's scalable and as a network architect I don't need to worry. If the solution is on-prem, like we have now, I have to worry about a potentially slow infrastructure, network, interfaces, capacity. On cloud, the only concern is internet connectivity. We have over 30,000 employees and they are all end users. 

How are customer service and technical support?

We use a third-party company that we cooperate with for our technical support, WiFi and for our network.

How was the initial setup?

In general, the setup is quite straightforward although with our factory site configuration, it was more complex. The setup took some time as we're a website company so everything here takes time! It's not a one day implementation, probably closer to a week for the end-to-end installation. 

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Network Engineer at Hyundai Autoever Company
Real User
Top 20
Has easy installation which can be completed in a day
Pros and Cons
  • "I find the tool to be 99 percent stable."
  • "The main disadvantage of Cisco Wireless is its cost - it's expensive. Its interface is not easy. However, I like it since I am an engineer."

What needs improvement?

The main disadvantage of Cisco Wireless is its cost - it's expensive. Its interface is not easy. However, I like it since I am an engineer. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the product for ten years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I find the tool to be 99 percent stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Meraki is more scalable than Cisco Wireless.

How was the initial setup?

For Cisco Wireless installation, we usually need two people. The whole deployment takes about one day. Maintenance is good for engineers, but I'm unsure about regular users. It's easy, but we need about four people to maintain the product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten. 

What other advice do I have?

I prefer Aruba over Cisco Wireless. It is cheaper and easier to deploy, and the Aruba system is easier to install than Cisco solutions. I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Sreejesh S - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Specialist at COPYCAT LIMITED
Real User
Top 5
Enables mobility and centralized control and has less maintenance cost
Pros and Cons
  • "The product enables mobility and centralized control."
  • "The solution doesn't have much coverage area."

What is our primary use case?

My organization uses the solution for our hospitality industry customers.

What is most valuable?

The product enables mobility and centralized control. Embedded Wireless Controller and Software-Defined Networking are the best features of the product. The product has less maintenance cost.

What needs improvement?

The solution doesn't have much coverage area. The product should improve the licensing structure.

The solution should allow administrators to view and provide more access points to users through the mobile application.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for seven to ten years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

We always contact the support team. The team provides outstanding support.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is an easy process for a trained engineer.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment process depends on the use case. To deploy the product, we can configure the physical wireless controller and add all APs one by one. The deployment is time-consuming. We have certified engineers to deploy the product. Two to five engineers are needed to deploy the solution. We do not face any issues in maintaining the product.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The license structure is confusing.

What other advice do I have?

I am using the latest version of the product. Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1780668 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Technology at a individual & family service with 201-500 employees
Real User
High level of control, excellent support, and scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless are the level of control and management. I am happy with it."
  • "The reporting tool in Cisco Wireless could improve. If I am trying to receive information about a client or user, it's cumbersome to retrieve the information on the controller system. If I'm trying to find out where a client's been, it's cumbersome. You need another tool for Historical logs, but it should be all in one."

What is our primary use case?

I use Cisco Wireless Wireless across my buildings for education. I have students that use Chromebooks and staff that teach using the tool. 

How has it helped my organization?

Cisco Wireless provides network access for students. The benefits of using Cisco Wireless are we have enhanced education, and help kids learn and research. Additionally, it helps the staff teach.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless are the level of control and management. I am happy with it.

What needs improvement?

The reporting tool in Cisco Wireless could improve. If I am trying to receive information about a client or user, it's cumbersome to retrieve the information on the controller system. If I'm trying to find out where a client's been, it's cumbersome. You need another tool for Historical logs, but it should be all in one.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Cisco Wireless for approximately 10 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Cisco Wireless is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I can add more access points if needed, Cisco Wireless is a scalable solution.

We have approximately 3,000 users using this solution. We are using the solution extensively.

How are customer service and support?

My experience with Cisco support has been excellent.

How was the initial setup?

The setup of Cisco Wireless is straightforward and it took a couple of days to complete.

What about the implementation team?

I outsource some of the implementations and the planning stage can be the largest issue.

I do most of the maintenance of the solution, such as patching.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend a third-party integrator if they need help implementing the  Cisco Wireless, they can help out a lot.

I rate Cisco Wireless an eight out of ten.

Overall Cisco Wireless meets my needs, it has been in place for a while, and I am happy with the solution.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Wireless LAN
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.