Appgate SDP vs Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy comparison

Appgate and Google are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Appgate is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while Google is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 100% of Appgate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Google users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 15, 2026

Appgate SDP and Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy are competing products in secure access solutions. Customers find Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy superior due to its extensive features, despite Appgate SDP's competitive pricing and support.

Features: Appgate SDP offers dynamic access policies with granular control and seamless scalability, making it suitable for tailored security postures. It provides robust configuration capabilities and allows precise network access controls. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy integrates broadly with Google cloud services, offering streamlined operations and easy integration with existing systems. It features an intuitive user interface, making navigation simple.

Room for Improvement: Appgate SDP could benefit from a more user-friendly interface and simplified documentation. Enhancing its initial setup process would improve the user experience. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy's deployment outside Google cloud environments could be easier, and addressing its initial setup complexity can make it more accessible. Increasing flexibility for non-Google environments would broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appgate SDP provides flexible deployment options and responsive support services, facilitating customized solutions. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy benefits from an extensive support ecosystem and comprehensive documentation, although its deployment might involve more detailed initial setup for non-Google cloud environments.

Pricing and ROI: Appgate SDP offers competitive pricing, making it cost-effective for businesses needing tailored access control, with strategic ROI. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is priced at a premium, justified by its high-value integration within Google’s ecosystem. Its ROI is strong for businesses already leveraging Google Cloud services, offering consolidated security access with minimal friction.

To learn more, read our detailed Appgate SDP vs. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Appgate SDP vs. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Featured Reviews

reviewer2701851

Managing Director

Enhances web security with a single pane of glass and flexible deployment

I don't see any need for improvement; one of the really good things about iboss as a company is that they listen to customer feedback. I have suggested enhancements, and they are responsive, making changes for the better, and they do a lot of testing. To improve iboss, although we haven't used it, we considered the VPN solution that comes with the highest tier licensing, which includes DLP and various other add-ons. We prefer using another product which automatically logs you back onto your network when turning on your PC. With iboss, the connection is manual, which doesn't meet our needs. Additionally, sizing can be tricky because, although the initial recommendations may seem adequate, actual usage may require more gateways than anticipated.

Read full review

IgnitiusMolepo

Senior IP Network Defense at MTN

Helps us manage traffic-related issues and streamlines access management for the network

Appgate SDP has significantly streamlined our access management, providing a notably efficient solution compared to traditional VPNs. The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal effort, unlike VPNs which often involve waiting for connection handling and unblocking. Recognizing the robustness of SDP, we made strategic decisions to minimize reliance on VPNs, reserving only two for administrative purposes. In a scenario where Appgate SDP significantly improved our network security posture, the platform played a crucial role in fortifying defenses against major threats. The encryption algorithms utilized by SDP provide a high level of security to our network architecture. Compared to Cisco, SDP proves to be most critical in protecting resources with the help of role-based policies. It only provides selective access to the application. The dynamic policy engine significantly enhances our access control mechanisms. It has single sign-on and multifactor authentication features. It makes processes faster and easier. It has helped our IT team to manage the workload with ease. It gives an intelligent solution whenever they face traffic-related problems. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Nobuaki Kitamura

managing director of IT Department at Nara OA System Inc

Google Cloud Platform works better with Google Workspace, stable product but a bit complicated, especially the networking

We used Google Workspace, so all my employees have Google Workspace accounts. I initially wanted to use Google Cloud Platform for subscription compatibility. Google Cloud Platform works better with Google Workspace, but unfortunately, it's a bit complicated, especially the networking. Oracle Cloud's virtual network system is much easier and more flexible. Also, Oracle was cheaper. That's the main reason we chose Oracle Cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"iboss has significantly lowered the number of security incidents. It is crazy how much it blocks and how much it is aware of the outside danger."

"The console is cloud-based, which is something I really appreciate."

"It was a very easy product to install. It can be deployed very fast."

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

"The iboss system is highly reliable. The false positive rates are small compared to some other systems we've experienced through other partner agencies who use competing solutions."

"iboss is pretty scalable. They provide good support. The case managers you work with to coordinate what you need are pretty good."

"We were impressed by the solution's mental health function, which can detect if someone needs help. It scans what users are browsing and flags warning signs so we can check to see if they are okay. We've had to use it a couple of times."

"Our primary use case for this product is DLP,"

More iboss pros

"It is pretty stable."

"The interface is really friendly. It's simple to understand."

"One of the most important features is stopping lateral movement across our network."

"The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal effort."

"The flexibility of the tool is valuable. It is very robust. It has a very robust configuration capability."

"It is a scalable solution...The support answers your questions very fast."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It's reliable."

"The solution's speed, processing power, and user functionality are some of its most valuable features."

"I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data on local machines, reducing the risk of data loss"

"The latest versions of the managed Kubernetes clusters are good."

"Functions well and has good features."

"There is a lot of flexibility and a lot of control if you use this efficiently."

"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Platform are the Kubernetes engine, CI/CD, and BigQuery."

More Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy pros

Cons

"One thing I would like to see differently with their Zero Trust platform is that some of the AI aspects related to high-risk activities have more false positives."

"If they could implement an extra security layer preventing access to iboss from the open internet, it would be great."

"Sometimes, obviously, there are bugs."

"Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device and filtering did not always work correctly."

"Sometimes when you call in support, you get someone who is just following a sheet. It feels like a runaround. You feel that you are running into that support wall."

"Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device and filtering did not always work correctly."

"To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."

"For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company ExxonMobil."

More iboss cons

"The user interface should be improved as it is not very easy to work with the updates."

"On the cloud, when you make some changes, it may be difficult."

"One thing that kind of sticks out to me is the ability to do a proper non-split tunnel. VPN tunnel-wise, it is not really a true unsplit tunnel, but I think that's just because of the way it's designed. A split VPN basically allows your system to talk to other systems without being forced down the tunnel. A VPN running in a non-split tunnel mode forces all the traffic down the tunnel to wherever you're VPNing to. It forces the traffic down so that the traffic is subject to the firewall and rules that you have in your corporate environment and such. It helps to prevent remote malicious folks that may be talking directly to that box from piggybacking into the corporate environment through it. They do it partially, but it would be nice to see more of an enterprise-level solution there."

"They could provide a single-box solution to manage tools for 4000 users. Additionally, they could add extra features to enhance remote micro connection."

"One limitation is that it's harder to provide access to multiple applications in the company with Appgate, but that's probably because of poor management."

"It would be better to connect to an application portal from any device. Documentation and support could be better."

"The solution should have better integration."

"As an individual developer, I would like Google Cloud IAP to offer more flexibility, especially for smaller-scale usage."

"The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware."

"The tool's grouping option layout and cost are areas of concern where improvements are required."

"Google Cloud Platform is not a product that is very flexible for end-users, especially owing to the fact that there is not much documentation available for the product."

"Stability-wise, the service could be improved."

"There are certain shortcomings with the product's stability where improvements are required."

More Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17."

"It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so."

"The pricing is according to the market price. It is not a very cheap solution. They have some very aggressive promotions to sell the product in the market."

"There is a need to make yearly payments toward the solution's licensing."

"I think the price of Google Cloud Platform is reasonable. However, Microsoft is the most cost-effective solution for us because of Azure's integration. And we already have licenses for Windows Server and the databases, so the price is attractive."

"When comparing the price of GCP to other solutions it provides more value for the money."

"It is expensive to scale up the solution."

"The licensing costs us $100,000 so pricing could be better."

"There is a need to make payments towards the license in charges attached to the product on a yearly basis."

"The customer purchases an annually sponsored license."

"The product is free."

More Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company Exxon...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

Previously when I used iboss, we did the POC for iboss for ExxonMobil. Four or five people wanted to move from our ol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern. There are cheaper alte...

See all answers

What do you like most about Appgate SDP?

The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appgate SDP?

They could provide a single-box solution to manage tools for 4000 users. Additionally, they could add extra features ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Appgate SDP?

We use Appgate SDP as a substitute for traditional VPN.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?

I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT back...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?

There are different pricing plans depending on data volumes and services, but it's comparable to other providers. The...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy should improve stability.

See all answers

Comparisons

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 14% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise vs iboss

Compared 3% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs Appgate SDP

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Appgate SDP

Compared 8% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Appgate SDP

Compared 6% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Appgate SDP

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Appgate SDP

Compared 4% of the time

More Appgate SDP Competitors

Cloudflare One vs Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

Compared 20% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

Compared 12% of the time

Portnox vs Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

Compared 11% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

Compared 7% of the time

More Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

January 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

November 2025

Download Appgate SDP product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

January 2026

Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report

Download Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

GCP Cloud IAP, Google Cloud Platform Cloud IAP, Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

Appgate SDP is a network access control tool for local and remote access, multifactor authentication, and micro-segmentation. It is a flexible, robust, and configurable tool with good documentation, interface improvements, and ease of deployment.

It helps organizations prevent lateral movement across networks and servers and provides a more granular access control structure than traditional VPNs. Appgate SDP's valuable features include the ability to hide servers, good support, stability, scalability, and stopping lateral movement. It is currently being used as the main VPN solution for many companies.

Appgate

Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy offers scalable, user-friendly identity management with efficient data processing and seamless integration, providing reliable access management and collaboration across platforms.

Identity-Aware Proxy by Google Cloud provides a secure and intuitive interface for managing user identities and controlling access to applications. It integrates with platforms like Amazon and Microsoft to facilitate real-time collaboration. With support for Kubernetes, CI/CD, and BigQuery, it enhances performance by enabling secure and efficient data processing. Users find the pricing appealing as it allows for flexible deployments. Despite its strengths, improvements are sought in user intuitiveness, enhanced security, and documentation. Challenges such as stability, regional availability, and data management persist, highlighting the need for more refined integration and storage options.

What are the key features of Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy?

Scalability: Adapts to varying demands efficiently
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation across functionalities
Robust Data Processing: Ensures high-speed data operations
Efficient Security: Protects applications by verifying identities
Cloud Integration: Supports Amazon and Microsoft platforms
Flexible Deployment: Accommodates various use cases with Kubernetes and CI/CD

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Attractive pricing plans for diverse needs
Stability and Reliability: Consistent performance with minimal disruptions
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates online teamwork across devices
Seamless Application Security: Ensures secure access to tools and data

In industries leveraging Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy, companies manage identities to enhance security and streamline operations. Educational institutions apply its secure online teaching capabilities, while tech firms utilize its integration with CI/CD for deploying container platforms. Enterprises harness its potential for managing resources, automating processes, and hosting applications, ensuring seamless data access across devices for collaborative projects.

Google

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

United States Air Force FINRA Weight Watchers Rackspace DataDog SageNet Verdant Norwegian Cruise Line VoiceBase The Third Floor

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Appgate SDP vs. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

December 2025

Free Report: Appgate SDP vs. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy

Find out what your peers are saying about Appgate SDP vs. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Appgate SDP vs. Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.