Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Site Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.6
Azure Site Recovery offers cost savings and efficiency, reducing VM backup time by 30% compared to Veeam.
No sentiment score available
Azure Site Recovery is time-saving, and its features allow us to automate processes and save resources.
The return on investment materializes immediately in incidents requiring compliance with regulatory laws.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
Azure Site Recovery's support receives mixed reviews, praised for expertise but criticized for delays and complex communication.
Sentiment score
7.4
Dell RecoverPoint's support is generally reliable with positive feedback, despite some mixed experiences and slower response times.
We primarily rely on our Cloud Support Partner for support.
The technical support from Dell is excellent.
We haven't had issues with their support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Azure Site Recovery is highly scalable, effectively expanding systems for diverse businesses, despite some synchronization and location-specific challenges.
Sentiment score
8.5
Dell RecoverPoint for VMs offers scalable, multi-site replication, catering to large enterprises with significant data protection needs despite its cost.
It offers options to add more virtual appliances to manage parallel replications as needed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Azure Site Recovery is highly stable, with users praising its reliability and only minor, infrequent issues reported.
Sentiment score
7.0
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is generally stable, with minor bugs and consistent reliability, especially up to VMware version 7.
I would rate the stability of Azure Site Recovery at eight to nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Site Recovery needs improved replication, error logging, pricing clarity, scalability, security features, and better integration with platforms.
Dell RecoverPoint for VMs needs better usability, affordability, integration, support, and features to address user challenges and deficiencies.
Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options.
There is increasing demand for compatibility with other hypervisors, such as Hyper V and KVM Proxmox.
We haven't seen a bug or an issue that would require improvement of the appliance, whether it's the virtual appliance or something else.
 

Setup Cost

Azure Site Recovery pricing is complex, with costs influenced by usage, storage, and network factors, typically around $225 monthly.
Dell RecoverPoint for VMs is costly, with recent price hikes and limited licensing flexibility, but enterprises find it reasonable.
Customers may choose to extend support for another year if they lack budget to acquire the whole solution again.
The cost of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has increased recently with less licensing flexibility.
 

Valuable Features

Azure Site Recovery offers ease of use, scalability, and efficient disaster recovery, despite pricing concerns and shared disk limitations.
Dell RecoverPoint for VMs offers efficient recovery with journal-based replication, VMware integration, and automated protection across environments.
Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.
The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great.
It offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery as a Service (2nd)
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (13th)
 

Featured Reviews

Mike Douthitt - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time
Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
ClaudioSalgado - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites
It offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots. It allows for automated VM protection during processes like failover and testing, and it offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites. It also provides IP address management when network configurations differ across sites.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?
Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?
Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options. Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services. Integrating these services would make the solution more a...
What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?
One of the standout features of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is its real-time data protection capability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?
The cost of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines has increased recently with less licensing flexibility. It's now part of a larger bundle rather than a standalone product.
What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?
The solution currently supports only VMware. There is increasing demand for compatibility with other hypervisors, such as Hyper V and KVM Proxmox. Additionally, licensing has become less flexible a...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.