Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bizagi vs WorkFusion comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Bizagi users report a 20%-30% ROI, citing enhanced automation, cost savings, and increased efficiency, prompting upgrades.
Sentiment score
7.6
WorkFusion's automation boosts productivity, cuts costs, and enhances accuracy, enabling significant returns and efficiency without extra hiring.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Bizagi offers responsive customer support, though response speed varies, with premium plans mitigating delays; online resources aid accessibility.
Sentiment score
7.4
WorkFusion's support team is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though some desire improved upgrade support and communication.
The toolset is very intuitive, so we didn’t need to contact their support much.
We cannot expect major customer support.
They respond quickly, collect necessary logs, and sometimes propose new solutions.
Some issues are resolved quickly, while others might take time as they require further analysis.
Initial support often struggles to find solutions, leading to delays until more experienced personnel get involved.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Bizagi scales well with Azure cloud support, though price and server resources affect performance in large expansions.
Sentiment score
7.3
WorkFusion offers scalable automation, robust integration, and widespread deployment despite version-specific challenges, meeting substantial automation needs effectively.
There is no direct scalability option.
If I rate scalability from one to ten, I would probably give it a six.
WorkFusion is efficient for structured automation tasks with predefined templates and clear documentation.
The number of bots currently running on the platform should be more than 1,000, including RPA and non-RPA bots.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Bizagi is generally reliable but experiences occasional freezes, slow loading, and performance issues, especially with large processes or updates.
Sentiment score
6.9
WorkFusion is generally reliable with effective support, but faces challenges in memory usage, infrastructure, and high-volume task stability.
WorkFusion requires a strong background in Java to meet requirements effectively.
I frequently face issues with infrastructure and some WorkFusion-related problems, such as login issues.
Some stability problems may arise from processes that have not been designed or coded properly, leading to glitches.
 

Room For Improvement

Bizagi struggles with performance, licensing complexity, and inadequate integrations, hindering workflow efficiency, collaboration, and user experience.
WorkFusion needs ERP integration, user-friendly features, codeless options, improved ML and OCR, plus accessible global training.
For more mature environments, the integration to live systems is lacking, which affects its applicability.
Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased.
In low-code automation, most parts are not customizable, particularly when Excel is involved, which increases complexity.
The main concern is the technical nature, which requires significant Java skills.
 

Setup Cost

Bizagi provides a free modeling version, pricier enterprise features, and cloud options; smaller organizations find it valuable.
WorkFusion is costly but offers unlimited licenses for some, making it worthwhile for enterprise-scale deployments despite complex pricing.
Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it.
Currently, I would rate their pricing around two, as WorkFusion's cloud version seems costly compared to others.
It is worth the money as a tool.
I am not familiar with the exact pricing, however, it is considered pricey.
 

Valuable Features

Bizagi offers an intuitive interface, robust automation, strong integration, and low-code environment, enhancing process management and visualization.
WorkFusion offers robust automation with user-friendly features, comprehensive integrations, scalability, and efficient document processing capabilities.
It is open source.
The user interface is very good, making it easy for business people to understand.
It also supports reusable code components through Java, making it efficient for developers.
They provide an inbuilt Selenium framework and infrastructure that eases my workload, allowing me to write Java code and embed it within Groovy classes.
The platform now includes auto machine learning and AI capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi
Ranking in Process Automation
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (6th), Business Process Management (BPM) (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (4th), Process Mining (5th)
WorkFusion
Ranking in Process Automation
14th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (8th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 6.9%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkFusion is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration
Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.
Shamus Cardon - PeerSpot reviewer
It has improved our accuracy since we are eliminating the human error element. There could be better version control through their web platform.
We only have our engineering team writing code and developing business processes since it is very technical. In terms of data extraction and training the ML models, we deployed that to our accounts payable department, which has fewer technical users than our engineering team. After a handful of training sessions, they were able to get in there and use it with decent accuracy. It could be better, but it is definitely better than nothing. One of the big upgrades that I know is happening in version 10 is an improvement to their tagging interface. That is definitely something that I am excited about to sort of reinvigorate our more non-technical users in information extraction from our documents. There could be better version control through their web platform. That is something that could be improved on. Integration from the IDE, e.g., from WorkFusion Studio directly into Control Tower, would be nice to have too.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?
I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...
What do you like most about Bizagi?
The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?
Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.
What do you like most about WorkFusion?
If you compare it to its competitors in the market, it is more Java-native.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WorkFusion?
Currently, I would rate their pricing around two, as WorkFusion's cloud version seems costly compared to others. However, I don't deal directly with purchasing.
What needs improvement with WorkFusion?
WorkFusion requires a high level of Java knowledge for programming, making it quite technical. Although they are moving towards a low-code, no-code platform, more effort is needed to cover the full...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
Deutsche Bank, Amerant Bank, Bank of Asia, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, LPL Financial, Carter Bank & Trust, Selective Insurance, HPE, Canadian Tire, Standard Bank, Humana, New York-Presbyterian, Houston Methodist, Six Financial, State Street
Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. WorkFusion and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.