Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bizagi vs WorkFusion comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Bizagi accelerates project timelines, reduces costs, and delivers significant ROI through efficient business process modeling and automation.
Sentiment score
7.6
WorkFusion boosts ROI by increasing productivity, automating tasks, and enabling employees to focus on valuable work, while reducing costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Bizagi customer service is generally satisfactory, but response times can be slow without premium, with many users relying on community support.
Sentiment score
7.5
WorkFusion's support is generally fast and helpful, resolving issues effectively, though some users report occasional delays.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Bizagi is considered scalable for medium-sized companies but has mixed reviews on performance and scalability for larger enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.3
WorkFusion scales effectively with flexible infrastructure and support, handling extensive deployments and adapting to dynamic business needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Bizagi is highly stable, with minor bugs and performance issues, but users appreciate its reliable, consistent operation across environments.
Sentiment score
7.2
WorkFusion is stable with minor memory concerns, offering robust performance and reliable integration, praised for handling large volumes.
 

Room For Improvement

Bizagi's desktop version lacks flexibility, has integration, performance, and support issues, and requires improvements in user-friendliness and documentation.
WorkFusion needs better ERP integration, user interface, AI features, and support for mid-sized businesses with simplified processes.
 

Setup Cost

Bizagi's free version is adequate for basic needs, but advanced features require a costly enterprise version, prompting requests for mid-range options.
Enterprise buyers find WorkFusion's pricing flexible and negotiable, though initial costs can be high compared to alternatives.
 

Valuable Features

Bizagi offers an intuitive interface, robust modeling, seamless BPMN integration, and flexible automation, praised for efficiency and ease of use.
WorkFusion excels with its user-friendly tools, AI-driven automation, machine learning for document processing, and seamless integration capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi
Ranking in Process Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (5th), Business Process Management (BPM) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (5th)
WorkFusion
Ranking in Process Automation
22nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (15th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 9.9%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkFusion is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Sebastian - PeerSpot reviewer
A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better
The ability to write our own code inside each activity is beneficial. Sometimes we need to create functionality that doesn't come out of the box, and this allows us to do that. The orchestration capabilities provided by the solution are good; they're helpful and fully functional, plus Bizagi has a management consultant to assist. However, they could be better, and there is significant room for improvement. We can adapt processes we created with Bizagi as our business grows and more processes become automated. We have been doing that on a live process, and it works very well. If the change we are implementing is very different to a traditional workflow, we can create a new version and design cases in the new version instead of the older one. We can modify processes already in place if the change isn't too disruptive, or we can keep using the same platform but create cases in a new workflow instead of the old one, so there's a lot of flexibility. Adapting processes is straightforward, though it depends somewhat on the complexity of the process. Making minor modifications is not complicated; we go into the studio, change the piece of code, workflow, or data model we need, and then redeploy.
Brock Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps improve our accuracy and compliance, but the analytics module can be confusing
Machine learning models for document-heavy processes have room for improvement because they require significant effort to train and update. WorkFusion can be easy to use for non-technical people. It has two modules: a workspace for analysts to use on a daily basis, and an analytics module for tracking throughput, recall, precision, and other model metrics. The workspace is very easy to use, similar to any other case management tool. The analytics module, on the other hand, can be confusing at times and could benefit from some improvements. The biggest challenge I've had with WorkFusion is employee turnover. On both of my projects with them, the primary developer, the PMO, and some of the product SMEs have all turned over. There's been a lot of turnover in their organization over the past two years.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
6%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?
I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...
What do you like most about Bizagi?
The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?
My company uses the free version of the product. In our company, we are doing documentation and modeling. When we reach that point of automating the processes, then maybe we shall acquire the paid ...
What do you like most about WorkFusion?
If you compare it to its competitors in the market, it is more Java-native.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WorkFusion?
Everything should be cheaper. However, it's fairly priced. They have a pricing scale. We've been with them for a while, so we've already hit the roof. We've been with them so long that they are ver...
What needs improvement with WorkFusion?
For non-technical users, it may be easy to use. It depends on what perspective we're talking about. From a business perspective, like manual tasks, it's good. However, it's all about what the devel...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
Deutsche Bank, Amerant Bank, Bank of Asia, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, LPL Financial, Carter Bank & Trust, Selective Insurance, HPE, Canadian Tire, Standard Bank, Humana, New York-Presbyterian, Houston Methodist, Six Financial, State Street
Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. WorkFusion and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.