We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"The Oracle integration tool is the most comfortable tool for using those Oracle products."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Workato. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.