Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Datadog comparison

Cisco Provider Connectivity...

Read 211 Datadog reviews

48,911 Views
21,521 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Datadog and Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance compete in the network performance and monitoring category. Datadog seems to have the upper hand in broad feature offerings and customer service, while Cisco is notable for its specialized network monitoring capabilities.

Features: Datadog offers sharable dashboards, anomaly detection, and extensive integration capabilities. Its hosted nature eliminates the need for additional infrastructure management, supporting integration with AWS and other cloud platforms seamlessly. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on network performance, providing application and network traffic analysis ideal for real-time visibility into operations, using tools like Flow Matrices and response time analysis.

Room for Improvement: Datadog could enhance API consistency and price transparency, and simplify its user interfaces for advanced users. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance could improve response time and data retention capabilities, while adding analytics and customization options for better user experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog offers extensive deployment options across private, public, and hybrid clouds and provides excellent customer service with effective real-time support, although regional variability might occur. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, mainly on-premises and hybrid cloud, offers proactive customer service, albeit with variable response speeds.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog's usage-based pricing can lead to unexpected costs, with a need for clearer pricing visibility. Its comprehensive, scalable nature promises quick ROI through network monitoring savings. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is seen as offering good value but can be costly post-acquisition. Both solutions emphasize rapid ROI through efficiencies in network and infrastructure monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Datadog Report (Updated: November 2026).

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Datadog

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Provider Connectivity...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

42nd

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

211

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Log Management (4th), Container Monitoring (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (8th), AI Observability (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 4.1%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Datadog	4.1%
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance	1.0%
Other	94.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Addresses connectivity issues with real-time monitoring while offering good local support

I had prepared for COC and the client. I work as a vendor for a client using Flow Mount for network performance monitoring. I focus on resolving client-side issues related to Packy Performance and quality use. This involves addressing network device issues, specifically Cisco network devices One…

Read full review

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at HR Software Solution

Unified monitoring has improved incident response and now reduces root cause analysis time

One area where Datadog can be improved is around alert quality. In the beginning, it tends to generate many alerts, and without proper tuning, many of them are not actionable. It would help if there were more built-in guidance or smarter defaults to reduce noise. Another improvement area is cost visibility and control. As log and metric ingestion increases, it has not always been straightforward to track which data is driving the cost. More granular and real-time cost insights would make it easier to manage. Additionally, while the dashboards are flexible, navigating and organizing them at scale can become slightly difficult. Better structuring or management options would help in larger environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ease of use; can literally diagnose an issue in about four clicks."

"What I like most about Accedian Skylight is that it's a UI application, so using it is easy. I also like that the support for Accedian Skylight is helpful."

"One valuable feature we have is real-time monitoring for connection issues."

"APM analysis is much faster than traditional root cause analysis of application problems."

"The feature I used to like the most was its ability to decode layer seven protocols, although this is becoming less useful now that encryption is so widespread."

"Capturing traffic [is very interesting]. Currently, with our configuration, we don't capture the payload of the packets, just the header. But when we want the body, the payload of the packets, we can do a PCAP, and then analyze it within Wireshark."

"It is not that expensive of a solution and produces tremendous value."

"This solution has helped to improve the interaction between our network, datacenter, and application teams. I have used other tools, but this tool can pinpoint the root cause of my application or network issue in the majority of the cases. So, it helps different divisions or groups in the IT department to troubleshoot together and get an issue resolved. This tool helps a lot in our day-to-day networking application and IT operations."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance pros

"The solution is useful for monitoring logs."

"The solution has improved the organization by providing good insights into app performance and offering good dashboards."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"Overall, it has improved operational efficiency and reduced downtime by enabling quicker responses during incidents."

"Its integration is most valuable because you can integrate it with various service providers such as AWS, .Net, etc."

"Going from viewing a metric to creating a monitor alerting on a metric is very easy."

"The solution allows flexibility and heightened observability for presenting data, creating indicators, and setting service-level objectives."

"Datadog's log aggregation is really helpful since it lets me and every other engineer on my team login, view, and share logs when we need to debug our application."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"Embed a warning system to a mailbox when it exceeds the threshold for use of bandwidth over a given period of time."

"We have encountered problems with the license that is connected to the hypervisor on which the virtual appliance is deployed."

"Human resource costs can be high when dealing with connection issues."

"The UI interface of Accedian Skylight could improve."

"For the PVX, they are in the process of getting the results to export to cloud and SaaS for analytics. They told me that this will happen later this year. Right now, for the most part, I create that data myself."

"The licensing of the virtual pollers is problematic because they are attached to the physical ESX on which they are installed."

"It's a bit slow. When I execute a query, something general with a short timeframe that covers one month, for instance, and I do not specify the IP source or IP destination, it can take ages because it has to query the whole database."

"Increase the drive’s capacity to store more data, and maybe switch to a database system similar to 3Big-Data."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance cons

"The FinOps needs improvement."

"It is hard to educate an entire team. There is a big learning curve."

"It would be ideal if the product offered a bit more monitoring from our dashboard."

"We have asked technical support questions, and sometimes they don't get back to us right away. Or when they do, it is not the right answer."

"We've had some issues where we had Datadog automatically turned on in AWS regions that we weren't using, which incurred a small but steady cost that amounted to tens of thousands of dollars spent over a few weeks."

"It could use some additional features when working with metrics like Grafana or like New Relic has. Datadog does not use library technologies like Dynatrace does. Datadog has machine learning too, but it does not have this option in all layers of monitoring like infrastructure service process in applications."

"Logging is not a great experience."

"It seems that admin cost control granularity is an afterthought."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of Accedian Skylight is really good. The sensors are low cost. Their model to analytics for sensors is by license, endpoint, or session. With the probes for their analytics, if they get deployed virtually, they are free. The licensing is only based on flows. So, you can effectively deploy probes everywhere in your network. Then, if you want to look at a specific type of traffic, you can enter into it with a very low cost license. You can just use things like spam ports, mirrors, TAPs, and aggregators to optimize what sort of traffic you send to these analysis tools. Then, if you want to start looking at more, you can up your licensed as you go. You are not getting forced into expensive appliances or subscription models."

"The pricing is cheaper than other competing products, which is better for our budgets."

"The price is competitive overall, depending on the type of customer."

"If you look into Riverbed, it's a licensing nightmare. You need to pay for every type of analysis... If you don't look into licensing, Riverbed and SolarWinds are pretty comparable. But if you look into licensing it would not be smart to go for either of them. On the pure, bare-metal basis, it's the same. But when you get the bare metal and a few basic licenses, then you need all those other licenses just to be sure that there's no issue... One of the great things about Skylight is you have them all, and you actually need them all."

"Pricing is a little bit expensive."

"It provides value and the cost is not huge."

"It's not for free, clearly. But on the other hand, it offers very interesting functionality. We pay around €100,000."

"The solution was previously well-regarded, but after being acquired by Accedian, the prices have significantly increased. This has made it challenging to sell the product due to its high cost. It is an expensive solution."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance pricing and cost advice

"The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship."

"They prefer monthly subscriptions."

"The solution's pricing depends on project volume."

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"The tool is open-source."

"While it is an expensive product, I would rate the pricing level at four out of five."

"Pricing seemed easy until the bill came in and some things were not accounted for."

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	100

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Accedian Skylight?

Human resource costs can be high when dealing with connection issues. I require more tools to file and resolve these issues efficiently.

What is your primary use case for Accedian Skylight?

What advice do you have for others considering Accedian Skylight?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

Dynatrace vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

DX SaaS vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 3% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Avantra vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance product report

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance report

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

Accedian Skylight, Accedian SkyLIGHT PVX, SkyLIGHT PVX, SecurActive, Performance Vision

No data available

Overview

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers a user-friendly interface with real-time monitoring and network analysis, aiding businesses in identifying connection issues and optimizing performance.

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is recognized for its real-time monitoring capabilities and straightforward GUI, key in diagnosing network performance issues and managing application performance. Its bandwidth utilization and network analysis features help optimize performance. Users can program captures for comprehensive performance checks, improving application performance analysis and troubleshooting. Though high pricing and licensing challenges are noted, and there’s a demand for improved design and adaptable reporting, it remains a valuable tool for network health insights.

What Are Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance's Most Important Features?

User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and straightforward setup.
Real-Time Monitoring: Quickly identifies connection issues.
Bandwidth Utilization: Optimizes network performance.
Latency, Jitter, and Throughput Display: Offers insights into network health.
Programmable Captures: Ensures comprehensive performance checks.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For in Reviews?

Network Performance Diagnosis: Efficiently identifies and resolves issues.
Device Health Monitoring: Keeps a close check on network devices.
Application Performance Management: Ensures optimal functioning across deployments.
Reduced Packet Loss: Enhances overall user experience.
Bandwidth Monitoring: Aids in resource management.

Implementations of Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance span industries from data centers to remote offices, supporting on-premise and cloud deployments. Companies leverage it to ensure network efficiency and reduce packet loss, providing vital analytics that enhance user experiences and support business operations.

Cisco

Datadog offers a comprehensive platform for monitoring applications and infrastructure, providing insights into real-time metrics and optimizing performance with extensive integrations and analytics capabilities.

Datadog provides a robust monitoring platform designed for applications and infrastructure tracking. With intuitive dashboards and real-time metrics visibility, it enhances operational efficiency and enables proactive incident management. The platform supports data centralization across services, reducing downtime through its monitoring capabilities. Integration with AWS, Kubernetes, and other systems aligns with performance tracking and infrastructure management, while APM and RUM features allow tracing and user behavior analytics.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies monitoring processes with user-friendly design.
Extensive Integrations: Offers seamless integration with platforms like AWS and Kubernetes.
Real-Time Metrics: Ensures up-to-the-minute visibility of performance data.
APM and RUM: Enhances tracing and analysis of user behavior.
Customizable Monitoring: Personalizes tracking and alerts based on specific requirements.

What Benefits Should You Look for in Reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Improves performance and incident management through data centralization.
Proactive Incident Management: Reduces downtime with timely alerts and insights.
Integration Flexibility: Utilizes cloud services to ensure comprehensive observability.
Dashboard Visualization: Offers enhanced interface for data representation.

Industries utilizing Datadog benefit from detailed monitoring and comprehensive analytics across multi-cloud environments. Companies in e-commerce, finance, and technology sectors implement it for end-to-end monitoring ensuring robust application performance. The platform assists in maintaining standards through integration with services like AWS and Azure, providing efficient observability and allowing proactive issue resolution.

Sample Customers

T-Systems, Thomson Reuters, Bordeaux Metropole, CGI, Citadelle Regional Hospital Center, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Groupe BPCE, Group S, Splitpoint, Horus-Net, Audatex, Indexis, Province de Liège, EASI, Spie Batignolles, Faymonville

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Datadog