Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Datadog comparison

Cisco Provider Connectivity...

Read 211 Datadog reviews

48,911 Views
21,521 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Datadog and Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance compete in the network performance and monitoring category. Datadog seems to have the upper hand in broad feature offerings and customer service, while Cisco is notable for its specialized network monitoring capabilities.

Features: Datadog offers sharable dashboards, anomaly detection, and extensive integration capabilities. Its hosted nature eliminates the need for additional infrastructure management, supporting integration with AWS and other cloud platforms seamlessly. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on network performance, providing application and network traffic analysis ideal for real-time visibility into operations, using tools like Flow Matrices and response time analysis.

Room for Improvement: Datadog could enhance API consistency and price transparency, and simplify its user interfaces for advanced users. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance could improve response time and data retention capabilities, while adding analytics and customization options for better user experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog offers extensive deployment options across private, public, and hybrid clouds and provides excellent customer service with effective real-time support, although regional variability might occur. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, mainly on-premises and hybrid cloud, offers proactive customer service, albeit with variable response speeds.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog's usage-based pricing can lead to unexpected costs, with a need for clearer pricing visibility. Its comprehensive, scalable nature promises quick ROI through network monitoring savings. Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is seen as offering good value but can be costly post-acquisition. Both solutions emphasize rapid ROI through efficiencies in network and infrastructure monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Datadog Report (Updated: November 2026).

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Datadog

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Provider Connectivity...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

42nd

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

211

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Log Management (4th), Container Monitoring (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (8th), AI Observability (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 4.1%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Datadog	4.1%
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance	1.0%
Other	94.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Addresses connectivity issues with real-time monitoring while offering good local support

I had prepared for COC and the client. I work as a vendor for a client using Flow Mount for network performance monitoring. I focus on resolving client-side issues related to Packy Performance and quality use. This involves addressing network device issues, specifically Cisco network devices One…

Read full review

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at HR Software Solution

Unified monitoring has improved incident response and now reduces root cause analysis time

One area where Datadog can be improved is around alert quality. In the beginning, it tends to generate many alerts, and without proper tuning, many of them are not actionable. It would help if there were more built-in guidance or smarter defaults to reduce noise. Another improvement area is cost visibility and control. As log and metric ingestion increases, it has not always been straightforward to track which data is driving the cost. More granular and real-time cost insights would make it easier to manage. Additionally, while the dashboards are flexible, navigating and organizing them at scale can become slightly difficult. Better structuring or management options would help in larger environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If [the problem] is something related to HTTP or VoIP, then I can have a quick look into the protocols, a process which gives me some good ideas..."

"This solution has helped to improve the interaction between our network, datacenter, and application teams. I have used other tools, but this tool can pinpoint the root cause of my application or network issue in the majority of the cases. So, it helps different divisions or groups in the IT department to troubleshoot together and get an issue resolved. This tool helps a lot in our day-to-day networking application and IT operations."

"The ability to measure performance end-to-end across the cloud data center allows us to take corrective action to keep our channels online."

"The response times, with the performance, are really interesting too, where you can see the packet loss."

"We have found this to be a very valuable toolset, and has paid for itself several times over."

"Skylight is not used on a daily basis, but when it's used it usually helps to fix a problem pretty fast."

"I think the analytics features are okay. My customer also likes the interface, the GUI, because it's easy to operate."

"Customer Service: Very good. Technical Support: Excellent and responsive."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance pros

"The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening."

"Datadog has positively impacted our organization, as it has eliminated many negative issues, which I call tool sprawl, by replacing four or five separate monitoring tools with one unified platform."

"We also use APM and metrics to view the status of our Pub/Sub topics and queues, especially when dealing with undelivered messages."

"Knowing the entry point helps us choose which part of the program should be improved next, and it also helps us with collecting important data about the overall usage of each module within our application."

"It has scaled great. I haven't run into any problems anywhere that I've used it. They have handled everything that we have needed them to."

"Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams."

"The most valuable aspect is the APM which can monitor the metrics and latencies."

"The visibility that it provides is valuable. It is helping in being proactive around incident management. It is helping us to be able to get more visibility into our customers' applications so that we can assist them at the application layer. We also provide them the infrastructure from an AWS standpoint. We are able to make sure that our customers are aware of certain critical things around the analytical piece of either the network or the application. We're able to call customers before they even know about the issue. From there, we can start putting together some change management processes and help them a bit."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"So scalability, at the moment, is pretty bad for us now, because our modus operandi have totally shifted."

"The UI interface of Accedian Skylight could improve."

"For the PVX, they are in the process of getting the results to export to cloud and SaaS for analytics. They told me that this will happen later this year. Right now, for the most part, I create that data myself."

"There should be an option to update and upgrade the solution to the new version without having to re-buy it. I have clients switching to other solutions. The old solution is great, but if you change your license to a new one, you have to almost re-buy it completely."

"Pricing is a little bit expensive."

"Because of the policies in Vietnam, we cannot connect the system to the Accedian cloud. It would be good if Accedian could provide a local cloud. In the next release, I would like them to focus on improving and adding more reporting features. This will help the operations teams."

"A lower price and more flexible versions will help the product."

"The Accedian Skylight user interface still has room for improvement."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance cons

"If I could change one thing about Datadog, it would be the pricing, as it has extraordinary functionality, but the pricing is somewhat expensive, and as we increase the number of servers and monitoring services, the cost increases."

"The product could do better with its notifications."

"We've had some issues where we had Datadog automatically turned on in AWS regions that we weren't using, which incurred a small but steady cost that amounted to tens of thousands of dollars spent over a few weeks."

"In production, we intend to use trace IDs generated by RUM to attach to support tickets when a user experiences a traceable network error, and we want to display this trace ID to the user so if they were to contact us about a specific issue, they can provide us an exact ID displayed to them back to us. Currently, this is not possible out-of-the-box client-side without inventing our own solution for capturing these trace IDs, such as shimming the native fetch or returning the ID from the service response."

"The installation is easy for me. However, if you are new to this solution it might not be so easy."

"They should continue expanding and integrating with more third-party apps."

"The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big. Datadog needs to provide better pricing for large customers."

"The product is quite complex, and there are so many features that I either didn't know about or wasn't sure how to use."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We understand there's a significant cost difference, but have yet to investigate fully."

"The pricing of Accedian Skylight is really good. The sensors are low cost. Their model to analytics for sensors is by license, endpoint, or session. With the probes for their analytics, if they get deployed virtually, they are free. The licensing is only based on flows. So, you can effectively deploy probes everywhere in your network. Then, if you want to look at a specific type of traffic, you can enter into it with a very low cost license. You can just use things like spam ports, mirrors, TAPs, and aggregators to optimize what sort of traffic you send to these analysis tools. Then, if you want to start looking at more, you can up your licensed as you go. You are not getting forced into expensive appliances or subscription models."

"If you look into Riverbed, it's a licensing nightmare. You need to pay for every type of analysis... If you don't look into licensing, Riverbed and SolarWinds are pretty comparable. But if you look into licensing it would not be smart to go for either of them. On the pure, bare-metal basis, it's the same. But when you get the bare metal and a few basic licenses, then you need all those other licenses just to be sure that there's no issue... One of the great things about Skylight is you have them all, and you actually need them all."

"The price is competitive overall, depending on the type of customer."

"The pricing is cheaper than other competing products, which is better for our budgets."

"It's not for free, clearly. But on the other hand, it offers very interesting functionality. We pay around €100,000."

"It provides value and the cost is not huge."

"The solution was previously well-regarded, but after being acquired by Accedian, the prices have significantly increased. This has made it challenging to sell the product due to its high cost. It is an expensive solution."

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance pricing and cost advice

"The price is better than some competing products."

"The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big."

"Sometimes it's very hard to project how much it will cost for the monthly subscription for the next month when you add certain features. Having better visibility of the cost would give a better experience."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

"Our licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis."

"The solution's pricing depends on project volume."

"Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics."

"Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	100

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Accedian Skylight?

Human resource costs can be high when dealing with connection issues. I require more tools to file and resolve these issues efficiently.

What is your primary use case for Accedian Skylight?

What advice do you have for others considering Accedian Skylight?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

Dynatrace vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Comparisons

Compared 5% of the time

DX SaaS vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 3% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Avantra vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance

Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance product report

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance report

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

Accedian Skylight, Accedian SkyLIGHT PVX, SkyLIGHT PVX, SecurActive, Performance Vision

No data available

Overview

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers a user-friendly interface with real-time monitoring and network analysis, aiding businesses in identifying connection issues and optimizing performance.

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance is recognized for its real-time monitoring capabilities and straightforward GUI, key in diagnosing network performance issues and managing application performance. Its bandwidth utilization and network analysis features help optimize performance. Users can program captures for comprehensive performance checks, improving application performance analysis and troubleshooting. Though high pricing and licensing challenges are noted, and there’s a demand for improved design and adaptable reporting, it remains a valuable tool for network health insights.

What Are Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance's Most Important Features?

User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and straightforward setup.
Real-Time Monitoring: Quickly identifies connection issues.
Bandwidth Utilization: Optimizes network performance.
Latency, Jitter, and Throughput Display: Offers insights into network health.
Programmable Captures: Ensures comprehensive performance checks.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For in Reviews?

Network Performance Diagnosis: Efficiently identifies and resolves issues.
Device Health Monitoring: Keeps a close check on network devices.
Application Performance Management: Ensures optimal functioning across deployments.
Reduced Packet Loss: Enhances overall user experience.
Bandwidth Monitoring: Aids in resource management.

Implementations of Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance span industries from data centers to remote offices, supporting on-premise and cloud deployments. Companies leverage it to ensure network efficiency and reduce packet loss, providing vital analytics that enhance user experiences and support business operations.

Cisco

Datadog offers a comprehensive platform for monitoring applications and infrastructure, providing insights into real-time metrics and optimizing performance with extensive integrations and analytics capabilities.

Datadog provides a robust monitoring platform designed for applications and infrastructure tracking. With intuitive dashboards and real-time metrics visibility, it enhances operational efficiency and enables proactive incident management. The platform supports data centralization across services, reducing downtime through its monitoring capabilities. Integration with AWS, Kubernetes, and other systems aligns with performance tracking and infrastructure management, while APM and RUM features allow tracing and user behavior analytics.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies monitoring processes with user-friendly design.
Extensive Integrations: Offers seamless integration with platforms like AWS and Kubernetes.
Real-Time Metrics: Ensures up-to-the-minute visibility of performance data.
APM and RUM: Enhances tracing and analysis of user behavior.
Customizable Monitoring: Personalizes tracking and alerts based on specific requirements.

What Benefits Should You Look for in Reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Improves performance and incident management through data centralization.
Proactive Incident Management: Reduces downtime with timely alerts and insights.
Integration Flexibility: Utilizes cloud services to ensure comprehensive observability.
Dashboard Visualization: Offers enhanced interface for data representation.

Industries utilizing Datadog benefit from detailed monitoring and comprehensive analytics across multi-cloud environments. Companies in e-commerce, finance, and technology sectors implement it for end-to-end monitoring ensuring robust application performance. The platform assists in maintaining standards through integration with services like AWS and Azure, providing efficient observability and allowing proactive issue resolution.

Sample Customers

T-Systems, Thomson Reuters, Bordeaux Metropole, CGI, Citadelle Regional Hospital Center, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Groupe BPCE, Group S, Splitpoint, Horus-Net, Audatex, Indexis, Province de Liège, EASI, Spie Batignolles, Faymonville

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Datadog