Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix Endpoint Management vs IBM MaaS360 comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft Intune support experiences vary, with premium users satisfied, others facing delays, and mixed effectiveness of support staff.
Sentiment score
6.3
Citrix Endpoint Management's customer service is praised for major issues but needs improved responsiveness for minor ones.
Sentiment score
4.0
IBM MaaS360's customer service is praised, but technical support reviews are mixed, citing response time and solution adequacy issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
Microsoft Intune faces challenges in reporting, cross-platform support, policy configurations, interface complexity, costs, and macOS management.
Sentiment score
3.3
Citrix Endpoint Management needs improved Android support, application integration, and responsive support, with challenges in MDM and iOS compatibility.
Sentiment score
3.9
IBM MaaS360 requires enhancements in UI, reporting, support, device management, security, and feature integration to match competitors.
If my organization has sensitive data we don't want to leak, deploying the policies can present technical challenges and potential loopholes.
The units are not updating the operating system as specified in the policy.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Microsoft Intune is praised for its scalability and adaptability, supporting various organizational sizes with seamless device management.
Sentiment score
7.4
Citrix Endpoint Management excels in scalable, modular architecture, efficiently handling large user masses across diverse deployments for enterprises.
Sentiment score
8.5
IBM MaaS360 is praised for its scalability, effectively supporting both small and large organizations, despite some cost concerns for smaller businesses.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
7.5
Enterprises find Microsoft Intune competitively priced and cost-effective, especially when bundled with other Microsoft services in agreements.
Sentiment score
7.1
Citrix Endpoint Management pricing is moderately competitive, with various licensing options and potentially high setup and ongoing costs.
Sentiment score
6.8
IBM MaaS360 is cost-effective for some users, yet pricing pressure and mixed reviews highlight concerns over affordability and value.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Intune is highly reliable, with minimal issues and high user satisfaction due to regular updates and strong infrastructure.
Sentiment score
7.6
Citrix Endpoint Management is stable with minor issues, high user satisfaction, and appreciated for its maturity and reliability.
Sentiment score
8.5
IBM MaaS360 is praised for stability and performance, though a few users experience minor issues like passcode delays and battery drain.
The solution is stable, though there are occasional restarts, which are not critical.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Microsoft Intune excels with seamless Azure integration, strong security, centralized management, enhancing productivity and cost-effective remote device management.
Sentiment score
8.7
Citrix Endpoint Management centralizes device management, enhances security, reduces costs, and improves application delivery for multiple platforms.
Sentiment score
8.5
IBM MaaS360 offers efficient, secure device management with comprehensive tracking, BYOD support, user-friendly interface, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.
Autopilot allows bulk enrollment of devices, making it easy for end users, even those without technical expertise, to use their devices immediately.
We have found the ability to manage user accounts on shared devices valuable as it reduces the need for multiple licenses, which saves costs.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
210
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (2nd), Remote Access (1st), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
Citrix Endpoint Management
Ranking in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM MaaS360
Ranking in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (10th)
 

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandola - PeerSpot reviewer
We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy
Intune has many benefits from the Microsoft perspective. This solution can manage Windows 10 devices, app management, and provide security solutions. We don't need to worry about our network connection, and we'll be more secure with regular security patches and compliance. Since everything will be deployed through the internet and users will log in using the internet only, the risks have been mitigated. Security updates, security patching, and the application will be targeted from Intune. The location tracker will be available to track where the device is and the user's location. The user will be restricted from accessing certain applications using compliance policies. Conditional access policies will be based on the reason why the user needs access to the application. Microsoft Intune is one of the best products in the industry for managing Windows devices. The solution has more feature restrictions. The conditional access policies also eliminate the dependency on the on-prem network for the devices. The solution also manages our security settings and a lot of other beneficial features such as Microsoft Purview which gives us the compliance portion. We can manage all aspects of our device from a single console, including M365 services. This allows us to configure data classification types, such as public, private, internal, confidential, and highly confidential.
SivaKuppala - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers flexible application management that allows secure delivery of applications to endpoints, enabling users to operate applications on the go
VMware is also a part of our practice, but my focus is predominantly on Citrix, which constitutes about 80% of our management, with VMware covering the remaining percentage. VMware excels in server-related virtualization and is considered the best in that domain. However, for desktop virtualization, Citrix is more mature. Both offer comprehensive product support and robust security features, with extensive partnerships across hardware vendors like HP and Cisco. In terms of cons, VMware tends to be more expensive and complex, with some degree of vendor lock-in. Citrix, on the other hand, offers a better user experience and is more flexible and scalable. While both platforms have their features, Citrix has less licensing complexity compared to VMware, and support quality is comparable between the two.
Bijay Kumar Swain - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to segregate data, well-suited for medium enterprises and installation is quick
We have some challenges. If we look at the challenges we face in the market, there are a few products like Sophos, where there are features of MaaS360, and the IBM EDR product, ReaQta. So, there are features from both ReaQta and MaaS360 available in Sophos, as well as a few other products, which we have challenges in replacing. MaaS360 definitely caters to a few of the requirements, but when someone is going for a solution, all the features are not available in MaaS360. It is like a combo, MaaS360, and IBM ReaQta, that is, EDR, ReaQta. Both of them, together as a combo plan, actually offer a very good proposition in terms of market competitors. There are a few products like Sophos and another product which have features from both endpoint detection and response and mobile device management. Because we have two different products with those features, we face challenges in proposing a particular product for the client. It is like a marketing challenge. The way other competitor products are available in the market. So it is better to have a different positive team, but, again, to remain in competition and have better scalability. So, IBM needs to integrate a few features that the competitors have in their products. No doubt, this is a different product, MaaS360. We call it MDM. We call it endpoint mobile device management. Then we call it different names that MaaS360 falls into. But when we are talking about competitor products, to remain in the competition, you need to have features that others provide. IBM surely has those features in other products, but not in MaaS360. The only challenge was replacing already existing competitor products with MaaS360. So, that’s the only area where we struggle because they always come with those requirements that they are already getting in the competitor’s product, which is not available in IBM’s MaaS360. So this product lacks some features, like Unified Endpoint Management.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
57%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Government
4%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
What do you like most about Citrix Endpoint Management?
One key feature is secure application delivery, which enables the secure delivery of mobile and web applications to e...
What needs improvement with Citrix Endpoint Management?
The support provided by Citrix needs improvement. The support should be more proactive, especially in critical sector...
What is your primary use case for Citrix Endpoint Management?
We work extensively with Citrix, specializing in Citrix utilization, Citrix networking, and Citrix mobility MDM. Our ...
Microsoft Intune vs IBM MaaS360 - which to choose?
Our organization researched both Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360 when considering the type of endpoint security tool...
What do you like most about IBM MaaS360?
We introduced the product as part of the SOC-2 requirement. The tool's most valuable features include keeping the ope...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM MaaS360?
IBM products are a little pricey, so it’s expensive. I would rate the pricing and licensing model a seven out of ten,...
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
MobileManager, Zenprise, XenMobile
Fiberlink MaaS360, MaaS360
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Miami Marlins, Exelon, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company (LG&E and KU), Flex, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company
Bancroft, Garuda Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix Endpoint Management vs. IBM MaaS360 and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.