NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Datadog are both powerful network performance monitoring tools, each catering to unique functionalities. NETSCOUT offers a more in-depth analysis with its specialized traffic inspection capabilities, making it ideal for detailed analysis tasks, while Datadog's extensive integrations and user-friendly dashboards make it a preferable option for cloud environments.
Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE provides deep packet inspection, packet capture, and NetFlow collection, along with the UC analyzer for monitoring real-time communications, all of which enhance its detailed traffic analysis capabilities. Datadog, on the other hand, excels with intuitive dashboards, seamless integrations with cloud services, and the ability to turn complex metrics into actionable insights quickly. It also simplifies infrastructure monitoring through its user-friendly ecosystem.
Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE's complex user interface and reliance on physical agents are noted concerns, alongside a need for improved modular payment options, which complicate its usage. Users mention complexities with software updates too. Datadog's high pricing and the intricate navigation of its extensive features pose challenges, along with data usage costs and limited enterprise-level configuration options, which impact its appeal.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is typically deployed on-premises, suitable for traditional setups but challenging in deployment, often requiring specialized contractors for technical support. Datadog stands out for cloud environments, offering flexibility and scalability. Nonetheless, its rising costs and support challenges in managing various features need attention.
Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is perceived as more expensive with its comprehensive feature set, often underutilized, and an inflexible pricing model. However, it delivers value through reduced troubleshooting times. Datadog's flexible pricing still presents as costly due to data scaling but improves operational efficiency through its quick issue resolution capabilities. Users must manage their pricing models carefully to avoid unexpected costs.
The distributor's support is rated an eight out of ten, indicating room for improvement in SLA handling.
They need to work on their response time and overall competence.
The solution is highly scalable and accommodates the growth needs effectively.
I rate the stability of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE as ten out of ten since we have not experienced any escalations or downtime issues from the end user's side.
Datadog is more stable than NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, being a SaaS-based solution compared to on-prem solutions like NETSCOUT.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
Customers want to have service assurance, including NPM and APM, from one vendor.
It would be beneficial to see more AI capabilities included in nGeniusONE to further streamline processes.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
The cost depends on the size of the customer, as sizing controls the pricing.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
The capability of real-time traffic intelligence is also very useful because it allows for the comparison between real-time and historical packet levels.
Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.
Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.
What are the key features of Datadog?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.