Dell CloudIQ vs Elastic Observability comparison

Dell Technologies and Elastic are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Dell Technologies is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.8, while Elastic is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Dell Technologies holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Elastic’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Dell CloudIQ

Read 9 Dell CloudIQ reviews

1,716 Views
1,164 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 27 Elastic Observability reviews

4,531 Views
3,911 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Dell CloudIQ

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Dell CloudIQ and Elastic Observability are products in IT infrastructure and application monitoring. Elastic Observability has the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities.

Features: Dell CloudIQ offers robust analytics for predictive insights, strong customer support, and comprehensive pricing. It empowers IT operations with actionable data. Elastic Observability provides unified visibility across data sources, is scalable, and integrates with various platforms, making it suitable for environments requiring extensive integration.

Room for Improvement: Dell CloudIQ could enhance its integration capabilities, offer more sophisticated predictive analytics features, and improve user interface customization. Elastic Observability might improve initial deployment processes, simplify its complex configuration requirements, and streamline its user interface for easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell CloudIQ is recognized for its straightforward deployment, which minimizes setup complexity and enhances customer service. Elastic Observability, while more complex in initial setup, compensates with extensive documentation and robust support resources that support a self-service deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: Dell CloudIQ offers competitive pricing that focuses on value with its predictive analysis capabilities, contributing to efficient resource management and better long-term ROI. Elastic Observability, although sometimes seen as higher in cost, offers significant ROI through its rich feature set and optimization across complex infrastructures, making it a compelling choice for extensive observability needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell CloudIQ

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Elastic Observability

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), Log Management (12th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Dell CloudIQ is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 4.1%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Has proactive monitoring with predictive insights and a user-friendly interface

Some of the most valuable features of CloudIQ include its health status alerts, which allow you to see quickly if there is something that needs immediate attention, preventing the need to check each system individually. It provides a status with traffic light colors, where red indicates danger, yellow means attention is needed, and green represents normal conditions to easily understand the health of the environment. The quick overview aids in decision-making. Additionally, CloudIQ's predictive capabilities, which are enhanced by artificial intelligence, have improved operational efficiency by providing proactive information to prevent issues before they arise.

Read full review

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."

"CloudIQ allows us to monitor our servers centrally, and we can receive notifications in case of issues, like a potential hard drive failure."

"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."

"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."

"CloudIQ allows us to monitor our servers centrally, and we can receive notifications in case of issues, like a potential hard drive failure."

"I rate CloudIQ a ten out of ten."

"Some of the most valuable features of CloudIQ include its health status alerts, which allow you to see quickly if there is something that needs immediate attention, preventing the need to check each system individually."

"It's convenient because you can access it from a mobile device without needing a laptop."

More Dell CloudIQ pros

"The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"Elastic team communicated well with us, so we decided to give it a try."

"The solution has been stable in our usage."

"I found Elk to be excellent for log analytics, security analytics, application code-level analytics, collaboration with DevOps teams, CI/CD, microservices, and Kubernetes, specifically cloud-native or cloud-specific tasks."

"Elastic provides built-in features for queries and report generation. It's a very good tool for monitoring integration capabilities."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

"For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."

"The main limitation of CloudIQ is that it is intended to be used exclusively with Dell hardware."

"There is a need for improvement in predictive maintenance, which I assume is somewhat AI-driven."

"It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards."

"Getting through support has become a difficult thing. Dell's support has degraded since they took over EMC. It's a bit difficult to use."

"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."

"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."

"If you have a heterogeneous environment, there might be some limitations in coverage since CloudIQ is primarily designed for Dell-based infrastructures."

More Dell CloudIQ cons

"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"More web features could be added to the product."

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."

"Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."

"Elastic Observability is an excellent product for monitoring and visibility, but it lacks predictive analytics. Most solutions are aligned with the AIOps requirements, but this piece is missing in Elastic and should be included."

"Elastic APM's visualization is not that great compared to other tools. It's number of metrics is very low."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it is a free product because we don't pay for it."

"The solution is more expensive than NetApp which offers file systems in various price ranges."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"The product is not that cheap."

"It is expensive. It is not cheap."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell CloudIQ?

Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell CloudIQ?

It can improve the reporting facility to create custom reports or dashboards.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell CloudIQ?

I use it for monitoring environment security today. I look at security, capacity, and availability in our environment.

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cost-efficient and provides all features in the enterprise license without asset-based licensing. However, sizing and licensing information could be clearer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability could improve asset discovery as the current requirement to push the agent is not ideal. Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE OneView vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 20% of the time

Datadog vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 10% of the time

NetApp Cloud Insights vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 9% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs Dell CloudIQ

Compared 8% of the time

More Dell CloudIQ Competitors

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 16% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

January 2025

Download Dell CloudIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

February 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Overview

CloudIQ is a no cost Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offering that provides a simple monitoring interface for an unlimited number of Unity systems. CloudIQ accesses data in near real time to enable monitoring and troubleshooting for Unity systems.

Dell Technologies

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

Sample Customers

North Carolina State University

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

January 2025

Free Report: Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.