

Dropbox Sign and DocuSign compete in the digital signature solutions category. Dropbox Sign seems to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness, although DocuSign is favored for its advanced workflow capabilities.
Features: Dropbox Sign is easy to use, customizable, and integrates seamlessly with platforms like Google Drive and Salesforce. DocuSign boasts advanced workflow capabilities, extensive flexibility, and a high-volume contract processing system. Both are secure and reliable options.
Room for Improvement: DocuSign requires better customer support and mobile app enhancements. Users report issues with document formatting and platform integration. Dropbox Sign could improve by adding payment processing and enhancing encryption.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DocuSign operates primarily on the public cloud with some scalability issues, while Dropbox Sign offers flexible deployment, including hybrid clouds, and receives positive feedback for customer service despite technical integration challenges.
Pricing and ROI: DocuSign is relatively expensive but delivers significant ROI due to comprehensive features and time savings for large-scale operations. Dropbox Sign is more affordable and cost-effective, offering competitive pricing and substantial time savings, leading to positive ROI.
In terms of working hours, the time saved per contract is significant.
I've seen cost savings since setting up my sister team, as they no longer need to print documents or sign manually.
In terms of cost savings, forty to fifty percent of our cost is saved by not having to print paper and use ink, which is very expensive.
I have seen a return on investment. The time saved and cost reduced, especially since our clients are not coming to our office to sign the documents and we are not going there to sign documents as well.
I have seen a return on investment, specifically faster time to contract signature, reduction in paper waste, time and cost savings through automation, and preventing our clients or us from going to their offices to sign documents.
It is proactive and responsive 24/7.
The customer support is one of the best; they are very interactive, proactive, supportive, and professional 24/7.
The customer support for Dropbox Sign is great, very unparalleled, supportive, and proactive.
It is highly scalable.
I have seen Dropbox Sign being very scalable because I have never seen it crash while dealing with a lot of e-signatures being sent back and forth to different clients.
Dropbox Sign's scalability is very good because we are able to deal with all our contracts and documents in Dropbox Sign.
Dropbox Sign is very scalable and can handle all our contracts to be signed on time without any buffering or crashing.
I've never noticed any crashes, downtimes, or performance issues with DocuSign.
I have not encountered any lagging or downtime since we started using this tool.
I have not seen any downtime or lagging.
Dropbox Sign is very stable, as I have not experienced any lagging or sluggishness.
The preview looks different from what I see during editing.
Dropbox Sign does not recognize signature fields in PDFs.
Dropbox Sign is very cost-effective. Any organization can afford it.
Allow editing of documents that have not been signed by any signer yet.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the price is very competitive, very affordable, and very cost-effective.
I find the pricing very affordable and cost-effective for any organization or personal use.
I estimate around forty to fifty percent cost savings.
The DocuSign CLM platform can be directly integrated with the DocuSign e-signature platform, which enables documents or contracts to be e-signed by vendors.
The security aspect in DocuSign is important since we work with individuals and their personal identifiable information, so we value that it's a secure site.
A specific metric I have noticed is that since we started using this tool, we have seen an increase in faster closing of deals and faster e-signed documents, from 40 to 60 percent.
There is cost savings by not having to print paper and use ink, which is very expensive.
We have seen a faster time to contract signature compared to our previous solution, which was DocuSign, achieving a 50% faster contract signature.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| DocuSign | 18.6% |
| Dropbox Sign | 2.9% |
| Other | 78.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
DocuSign electronic signature platform seems to be very easy to use, both for document senders and signers, ensuring broad adoption and user satisfaction. DocuSign supports all types of signing scenarios, from the simplest to the most complex, and is easily configurable so you don't have to modify your documents or workflows. Plus, with the most robust eSignature mobile capability, you can securely sign anywhere, anytime on any Internet-enabled device.
According to user reviews, Dropbox Sign is a popular e-signature solution that streamlines the signature process while providing advanced security features. Users value the platform's user-friendly interface, as well as its convenience and flexibility in enabling them to sign documents from any location, on any device. It is considered to be a dependable document management solution and recommended for businesses of all sizes. Additionally, it integrates seamlessly with other Dropbox services, making it a comprehensive and efficient tool.
Dropbox Sign streamlines your document workflows by helping you prepare, send, sign and track agreements with legally binding eSignatures.
We monitor all eSignature (Electronic Signature) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.