Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub CoPilot vs HCL Domino comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot boosts productivity and reduces costs with up to 500% return, improving customer experience and documentation efficiency.
Sentiment score
5.0
Opinions on HCL Domino ROI vary, with some reporting positive returns and operational benefits, despite initial deployment challenges.
Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.
Vice President of Products at C5i
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.6
Users have mixed experiences with GitHub CoPilot support, praising community help but noting occasional response delays and onboarding improvements.
Sentiment score
7.0
HCL Domino customer support is generally positive, praised for promptness and helpfulness, yet some find it complex and unfriendly.
With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
GitHub technical support is excellent.
AppSec engineer at EastNets Holding Ltd.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
GitHub CoPilot scales effectively, providing easy cloud-based scalability and flexibility, despite occasional traffic issues and automation challenges.
Sentiment score
7.2
HCL Domino offers effective scalability for many, but faces challenges with large databases affecting reliability for some users.
It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.
Vice President of Products at C5i
With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is quite easy to scale.
QA Manager at Synechron
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
GitHub CoPilot is generally stable, rated highly by users, with minor connectivity issues noted primarily in large enterprises.
Sentiment score
8.1
HCL Domino is praised for its stability and reliability, though some report performance declines with larger databases.
At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.
Vice President of Products at C5i
In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs better language support, IDE integration, user control, contextual accuracy, debugging, and technology support with cost concerns.
HCL Domino requires improved integration, updated interface, better performance, enhanced scalability, security, and support for modern technologies.
Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.
QA Manager at Synechron
There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.
Vice President of Products at C5i
In-line editing of documents and a document viewer are functionalities that would be beneficial.
SME at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
 

Setup Cost

GitHub CoPilot offers a free version, personal and enterprise pricing, with varied perceptions on its value and affordability.
HCL Domino pricing is seen as high, $100/user annually, affecting smaller enterprises' decisions against competitors like Microsoft Exchange.
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.
QA Manager at Synechron
The Notes client is very expensive, costing around $105 per client.
SME at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
 

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot boosts coding productivity with AI-driven suggestions, multi-language support, and IDE integration for efficient development.
HCL Domino offers strong security, seamless integration, cross-platform versatility, robust encryption, and efficient storage with DAOS for comprehensive application support.
It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.
Vice President of Products at C5i
Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour.
QA Manager at Synechron
Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its hybrid nature allows the use of both web-based applications and Notes client-based applications.
SME at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
HCL Domino
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
17th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.2%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL Domino is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot5.2%
HCL Domino0.8%
Other94.0%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages
Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.
PB
Architect at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees
Experience complete control and security in managing sensitive information and internal applications
One challenge I faced with HCL Domino was fully understanding its capabilities because initial use may lead to misconceptions based on simpler platforms. Exploring and comprehending what is possible takes time and effort, as understanding the full range of functionalities requires a mindset shift to leverage the platform's capabilities effectively. I believe HCL Domino is on a good improvement path, although a limitation is the lack of many service providers offering the platform, making initial setup more time-consuming for organizations without the expertise. If there were more subscription-based service providers available, it could enhance usability significantly, especially for organizations lacking the resources to install and configure systems.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.
What do you like most about HCL Domino?
The most valuable features of the solution are security and integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HCL Domino?
The Notes client is very expensive, costing around $105 per client. Overall, HCL Domino is a costly product.
What needs improvement with HCL Domino?
One challenge I faced with HCL Domino was fully understanding its capabilities because initial use may lead to misconceptions based on simpler platforms. Exploring and comprehending what is possibl...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM Lotus Domino, Lotus Domino
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
A1 Telekom, Acubiz, Afrisam, E. A. Juffali & Brothers, Fiducia & GAD, and Pakistan State Oil
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. HCL Domino and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.