No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IRONSCALES vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) comparison

IRONSCALES and Microsoft are both solutions in the Email Security category. IRONSCALES is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while Microsoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. IRONSCALES holds a 2.0% mindshare in Email Security, compared to Microsoft’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IRONSCALES users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Cloudflare One
Read 23 Cloudflare One reviews
  • 10,724 Views
  • 1,287 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IRONSCALES
Read 16 IRONSCALES reviews
  • 2,757 Views
  • 1,957 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Exchange Online P...
Read 42 Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) reviews
  • 5,855 Views
  • 4,274 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

IRONSCALES and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection compete in the email security category. IRONSCALES seems to have the upper hand with its AI-driven threat detection and response capabilities, particularly against zero-day phishing attempts, while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is valued for its robust infrastructure security and integration with Office 365.

Features: IRONSCALES provides AI-driven threat detection and response capabilities, facilitates immediate threat sharing from a global community, and integrates seamlessly with platforms like Microsoft 365. Its solution is particularly effective against phishing threats. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, on the other hand, delivers comprehensive anti-phishing, anti-malware, and spam protection, integrating well with Office 365 and providing strong infrastructure security. Users appreciate its accidental release protection capabilities and effective threat management policies.

Room for Improvement: IRONSCALES users look for better integration with Google Suite, more intuitive reporting, and enhanced customization for phishing training. Additionally, there is a need for improved language support and algorithm accuracy to reduce false positives. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection faces criticism for high costs and complex configuration, with users seeking improved handling of gray emails, a more intuitive user interface, and enhanced compliance features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions are primarily deployed on public clouds, but IRONSCALES offers strong customer service with high satisfaction regarding technical support. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection closely compares, though some users express concerns about the efficiency of tech support. Deployment for both solutions is generally straightforward, though users suggest interface improvements, especially for Microsoft.

Pricing and ROI: IRONSCALES is considered a valuable investment despite higher pricing, offering significant ROI through reduced manual tasks and enhanced security. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is priced similarly to premium offerings, with users noting the value linked to Microsoft's reputation and features. Both solutions have subscription-based pricing but face requests for more flexible and competitive options, with ROI often seen in breach prevention and long-term protection.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IRONSCALES vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
IRONSCALES vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One
Sponsored
Ranking in Email Security
20th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (15th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (21st), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (11th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (7th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (13th), Access Management (12th), Bot Management (3rd), ZTNA as a Service (8th), ZTNA (3rd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (10th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (3rd)
IRONSCALES
Ranking in Email Security
12th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (16th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (5th)
Microsoft Exchange Online P...
Ranking in Email Security
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Anti-Malware Tools (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IRONSCALES is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is 4.1%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Email Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)4.1%
IRONSCALES2.0%
Cloudflare One1.5%
Other92.4%
Email Security
 

Featured Reviews

CV
Cobe Van Coller
Network Architect at IP Dimension
Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites
I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.
Read full review
reviewer2770017 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2770017
Email Security Analyst at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Has improved threat analysis by providing clear email correspondence history and reporting tools
The best features IRONSCALES offers are the investigation tabs, headers, and correspondence history, which stand out the most for me. The investigation tabs are valuable for my work because reporting goes a long way in terms of playbooks and having a full investigation. The investigation tab knows exactly how to put the information in a way that makes it very easy for reports to get done fast. Security awareness training is a big part of IRONSCALES. The platform offers a broad spectrum in terms of what campaigns can be run for security awareness for users as well as reporting back on how users interact with their mails and understanding where the vulnerabilities lie. IRONSCALES has positively impacted my organization by making email security simple in terms of controlling mails, understanding where the threats are, and protecting the organization itself.
Read full review
NancyHartman - PeerSpot reviewer
NancyHartman
Business Process Manager/ Educational Technologist at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
Layered email security has protected sensitive research and still flags phishing in real time
The valuable features of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) include providing an additional layer of protection, as it builds on the basic Exchange level of security that allows us to get our work done. Another feature I appreciate is the ability to question things, as our Exchange server allows us to identify in real-time if an email is a phishing email or spam email. It really helps us identify risks, especially through our external exchanges via email or through our cloud-based platforms. Our Exchange system blocks any embedded AI from all our applications and products, so we cannot use embedded AI in our daily work from our official laptops because we have secure information. The system is quite locked down.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature is rate limiting. If I'm expecting 500 visits per hour, Cloudflare will limit the requests if I suddenly get 50,000."
"What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."
"It is a stable solution."
"It's a perfect solution from my perspective; it's easy to understand and easy to configure."
"Cloudflare is simple to use."
"Cloudflare Access is a stable solution."
"Cloudflare is simple to use."
More Cloudflare One pros
"It is just good to know that it is watching when we don't have to watch; I can go to sleep, and it is still working."
"The biggest benefit is that we get fewer phishing and spam emails, so using IRONSCALES has made our environment much safer."
"It has helped immensely because it has gotten rid of malicious links and malicious attachments that have been targeted at our different staff members."
"It is a totally stable solution."
"The fact that it is set-and-forget is valuable. Once you turn it on, you very rarely have to micromanage it, whereas, with a lot of spam filters, you have to go in very often."
"By having an integrated approach of combining email security and employee awareness training, they've hit the nail on the head."
"The stability is good."
"For what was being offered with IRONSCALES, I feel like we got an incredible deal."
More IRONSCALES pros
"Overall, I think it's really a great product."
"The initial setup was easy. The configuration process is very straightforward."
"The solution uses artificial intelligence and machine learning, so you don't need train it to detect something. The detection and response times are short. It's an excellent product."
"It is easy to configure, easy to use, easy to add exclusions, easy to track, and easy to add anything else if you want."
"It is useful for local users and our company because we use Microsoft 365."
"It offers great security against malware and other threats."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection are the EOP, ATP, safe links, fishing, and antispam."
"It's definitely scalable."
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) pros
 

Cons

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."
"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."
"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."
"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."
"For the topic of improvement, providing some training material is one of my suggestions."
"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."
"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."
"The free plan has limitations. For example, I can only set up three rules, and the application firewall is unavailable."
More Cloudflare One cons
"There's room for improvement in the campaign management."
"I would really prefer to drill down more on correspondence history. It provides detailed background information to actually understand what's going on."
"The simulation and training piece could be improved by having more granularity in terms of scheduling how campaigns are run and allowing people to directly take the training rather than having to go through an official campaign."
"In addition to integrated training, they should also have personalized training that you don't have to do as part of a phishing campaign or a simulation."
"As far as training awareness, I would give it 6.5 to 7 out of 10."
"The simulation and training piece could be improved by having more granularity in terms of scheduling how campaigns are run and allowing people to directly take the training rather than having to go through an official campaign. That's not available yet."
"Even though they have been continuously improving it, it is not 100% there. We have had a few incidents where legitimate emails were getting blocked, and we had to manually remove those emails from quarantine."
"I would like it if IRONSCALES had some sort of reminder mechanism, meaning IRONSCALES knows if a user completed the training or not. As long as it hasn't been completed, it keeps reminding every so often, alerts the manager, etc. Right now, it is all in the hands of the employee, and not all of them continue the process, which is a shame."
More IRONSCALES cons
"It wasn't easy or intuitive enough for me to start using it. So, the reason was that the solution changed."
"The tool is not 100% stable."
"I would like to get reports about vulnerable connections from our clients with information about domains, public IPs, etc. That would be highly useful."
"The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could be reduced to make it more competitive."
"I think the implementation could be more streamlined."
"Some features, like encryption, are not available."
"The product could be more stable. Microsoft products could be more stable because sometimes, even though they are updating some things, we cannot find those updates."
"Our company faces difficulty with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) because it's too big, clunky, and difficult for a small client to implement quickly and easily."
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."
"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."
"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."
"The prices are slightly expensive."
"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."
"The solution is not that expensive."
"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."
"As compared to everything else we looked at, it was good. It was the best value for the dollars."
"IRONSCALES is an expensive solution."
"Considering the value it provides, it is definitely worth the cost. We don't have to do manual analysis and remediation of phishing emails, which saves us a lot of hours. Its licensing is based on the number of users being supported and the number of email addresses being protected. I'm not aware of any additional costs."
"I don't know about its pricing because I don't run the budget or pay the bills, but if it was extortionate, we probably would be looking to scrap it, and because we are not, I assume its price is okay."
"There is an installation cost. Since we have this as a managed service, we pay for licensing and the managed service itself. Other than that, there are no additional costs."
"We pay $3000 plus a little more a year for the number of employees we have, and we're not even that big. The solution is at the higher end in terms of cost. It's not the most expensive product, but I would say it's worth the price if you have a high volume of email traffic. In our case, the solution has inspected over 162,000 emails between three and four months. It saved us a lot of time and money. It's a worthwhile investment because a bad actor only has to succeed once; we must defend against everything in our business. IRONSCALES offers a sense of security and confidence from being well protected."
"The tool is not very cheap, but it is affordable."
"The product is available as a middle-priced tool. I think it is not the cheapest solution."
More IRONSCALES pricing and cost advice
"The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is reasonable."
"The pricing of the solution is reasonable."
"The product's pricing is competitive for the US market."
"It is a low-price solution."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a six. For licensing, we can make monthly or yearly payments. Right now, we pay 5 USD per month to secure a person's license."
"Apart from the license fee for the solution, there are no additional costs."
"The solution's pricing is subscription-based rather than a yearly licensing cost. Pricing is based on the size of the environment and company and can be expensive."
"The product is expensive."
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Construction Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business24
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?
Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...
See all answers
What do you like most about IRONSCALES?
The solution captures a bit more of the unknown, quantifies it, and applies intelligence to it to pick out and stop a...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IRONSCALES?
While I don't specifically oversee the pricing details, I understand that IRONSCALES is in the range of similar solut...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IRONSCALES?
I would really prefer to drill down more on correspondence history. It provides detailed background information to ac...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Exchange Online Protection?
The initial setup was easy. The configuration process is very straightforward.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection?
From an end-user point of view, I am quite happy with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) because my favorite ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Exchange Online Protection?
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) serves as the main use case for my company because, as a research company,...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One
Compared 5% of the time
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One
Compared 4% of the time
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One Logo
FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
Twingate vs Cloudflare One Logo
Twingate vs Cloudflare One
Compared 3% of the time
More Cloudflare One Competitors
Proofpoint Email Protection vs IRONSCALES Logo
Proofpoint Email Protection vs IRONSCALES
Compared 9% of the time
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs IRONSCALES Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs IRONSCALES
Compared 9% of the time
Cofense Platform vs IRONSCALES Logo
Cofense Platform vs IRONSCALES
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs IRONSCALES Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs IRONSCALES
Compared 6% of the time
Perception Point Advanced Email Security vs IRONSCALES Logo
Perception Point Advanced Email Security vs IRONSCALES
Compared 2% of the time
More IRONSCALES Competitors
Proofpoint Email Protection vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Logo
Proofpoint Email Protection vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Compared 7% of the time
Cisco Secure Email vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Logo
Cisco Secure Email vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Compared 6% of the time
Fortinet FortiMail vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Logo
Fortinet FortiMail vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Compared 6% of the time
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Logo
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection vs Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloudflare One
April 2026
Cloudflare One reportDownload Cloudflare One product report
Buyer's Guide
IRONSCALES
March 2026
IRONSCALES reportDownload IRONSCALES product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
March 2026
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) reportDownload Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) product report
 

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform
No data available
Microsoft EOP, MS Exchange Online Protection
 

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?
  • Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
  • DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
  • Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
  • Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
  • Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
  • Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
  • Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

IRONSCALES delivers cutting-edge AI-driven email phishing detection and prevention, seamlessly integrating with Microsoft 365 for enhanced security.

IRONSCALES, with its advanced AI capabilities, focuses on email security by detecting phishing threats, mitigating business email compromises, and preventing impersonation. Its integration with Microsoft 365 strengthens spam filters, automatically responding to suspicious emails. The platform is used globally for threat inspection, quarantine, and end-user incident reporting. Staff training is enhanced through simulated phishing campaigns, offering an extra layer of protection beyond Microsoft's spam filters. Areas for improvement include better Google Suite integration, pricing adjustments, and enhanced reporting features.

What features make IRONSCALES stand out?
  • AI Phishing Detection: Advanced algorithms for identifying phishing threats.
  • Microsoft 365 Integration: Seamless enhancement of email security within Microsoft systems.
  • Mobile App: Manage email threats on the go.
  • Anti-Phishing Training: Simulated campaigns for staff education.
  • Multi-Organization Management: Centralized administration for multiple entities.
What benefits and ROI should you consider?
  • Time-Saving: Automated detection and response to threats improve efficiency.
  • Comprehensive Security: Offers an additional protection layer beyond standard spam filters.
  • Ease of Use: Intuitive integration and user-friendly design streamline operations.
  • Risk Reduction: Minimizes potential email security breaches through proactive threat management.

In finance, IRONSCALES plays an essential role in safeguarding sensitive data from phishing attacks, ensuring compliance with industry standards. Educational institutions use IRONSCALES for training faculty and students on recognizing phishing attempts, thereby enhancing overall cybersecurity awareness. IT sectors leverage its capabilities for managing complex threat landscapes.

IRONSCALES

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is a comprehensive email filtering and security service designed to protect organizations from spam, malware, and other email-based threats. It provides advanced threat protection, anti-malware and anti-spam filtering, and data loss prevention capabilities.

With EOP, organizations can ensure the security and integrity of their email communications. It uses multiple layers of filtering and scanning to detect and block malicious content, including phishing attempts, viruses, and ransomware. EOP also leverages machine learning and artificial intelligence to continuously improve its threat detection capabilities.

In addition to its robust security features, EOP offers advanced anti-spam filtering to reduce unwanted and unsolicited emails. It uses a combination of reputation-based filtering, content filtering, and sender authentication techniques to identify and block spam messages.

EOP also includes data loss prevention (DLP) capabilities to prevent sensitive information from being leaked or shared inappropriately. It allows organizations to define policies to detect and prevent the transmission of sensitive data, such as credit card numbers or social security numbers, via email.

Furthermore, EOP integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Exchange Online and other Office 365 services, providing a unified and integrated email security solution. It can be easily managed through the Exchange admin center, allowing administrators to configure and monitor security settings, review reports, and manage quarantined emails.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

23andMe
Allegheny Millwork, Ayrshire College, Nium, Orris, Paramount School District, Pres Les, PRT Staffing, Recovery Unplugged, Telit, WebHelp
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
IRONSCALES vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
March 2026
Free Report: IRONSCALES vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Find out what your peers are saying about IRONSCALES vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IRONSCALES vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) report.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.