Jamf Connect vs Zscaler B2B comparison

JAMF and Zscaler are both solutions in the ZTNA as a Service category. JAMF is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zscaler is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. JAMF holds a 1.9% mindshare in ZaaS, compared to Zscaler’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of JAMF users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Jamf Connect and Zscaler B2B compete in the identity management and network security categories respectively. Jamf Connect stands out for its integration with Apple ecosystems, while Zscaler offers superior security architecture.

Features: Jamf Connect integrates seamlessly with Apple devices, offering single sign-on and cloud identity integration. It simplifies macOS account management, providing an ideal solution for Apple users. Zscaler B2B specializes in zero trust security, offering advanced threat protection and secure web gateway capabilities, suitable for diverse IT environments needing robust security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jamf Connect facilitates straightforward integration with Apple products, offering a smooth deployment process. In contrast, Zscaler B2B's flexible cloud-based deployment adapts across various infrastructures, coupled with robust customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Jamf Connect provides a competitive setup cost, yielding strong ROI for environments focused on Apple devices, enhancing management efficiency. Zscaler B2B's pricing corresponds with its extensive security features, offering value for enterprises prioritizing comprehensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA as a Service

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the ZTNA as a Service category, the mindshare of iboss is 2.3%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jamf Connect is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zscaler B2B is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA as a Service Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
iboss	2.3%
Jamf Connect	1.9%
Zscaler B2B	1.0%
Other	94.8%

ZTNA as a Service

Featured Reviews

reviewer2701851

Managing Director

Enhances web security with a single pane of glass and flexible deployment

I don't see any need for improvement; one of the really good things about iboss as a company is that they listen to customer feedback. I have suggested enhancements, and they are responsive, making changes for the better, and they do a lot of testing. To improve iboss, although we haven't used it, we considered the VPN solution that comes with the highest tier licensing, which includes DLP and various other add-ons. We prefer using another product which automatically logs you back onto your network when turning on your PC. With iboss, the connection is manual, which doesn't meet our needs. Additionally, sizing can be tricky because, although the initial recommendations may seem adequate, actual usage may require more gateways than anticipated.

Read full review

Joost Van 'T Wout

Senior Endpoint Engineer (macOS/Jamf) at PVH Corp.

Customizable and good password management but needs better user-level profile deployment

The main use case for Jamf Connect was to synchronize local accounts with the identity provider, like Entra. However, due to some limitations with the enrollment sequence and user limitations, we decided to discontinue using it We previously used Jamf Connect to synchronize local accounts with…

Read full review

Siva Kuppala

Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited

Enables secure remote access and seamless app connectivity with reduced attack surfaces

Zscaler B2B provides significant security benefits by reducing attack surfaces through Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) implementation. It improves performance over traditional VPN-based security models and offers seamless VPN-less access to corporate applications. It also features cloud-native architecture, global data centers for traffic optimization, and auto-scaling policies. The solution supports multi-tenant security models and segmented security policies tailored to large enterprises.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"iboss is pretty scalable. They provide good support. The case managers you work with to coordinate what you need are pretty good."

"Iboss is a solution that prevents advanced persistent threats, and has a zero tolerance for attacks."

"Its initial setup was straightforward."

"We chose iboss for both zero trust and proxy (SWG) because their SWG was superior."

"iboss is among the few products providing inline filtering where no application is needed on the device. It operates on the network side and is not device-based. This feature was one of the main reasons why we stayed with them for so long."

"I would rate the technical support of iboss a solid 10 without a shadow of a doubt."

"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent. That's something that really helped us out. It's not just a simple proxy that just blocks the insights of potential threats that come on behind it. They do malware detection and that helps us a lot."

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

More iboss pros

"The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices."

"It's connection with Azure is the most valuable. It is easy to deploy and connect."

"It is easy to integrate into any existing IT workflow."

"The solution is scalable."

"Jamf Connect is a pretty simple and straightforward tool overall."

"It's a good and stable tool, so you should use it if you have a need."

"I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten."

"Jamf Connect allowed us to fully customize everything, offering a branded way to change passwords and manage integration with Entra instead of LDAP."

More Jamf Connect pros

"Zscaler B2B provides significant security benefits by reducing attack surfaces through Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) implementation."

Cons

"Its pricing could be better."

"I'd like to see them accelerate development on the security side, particularly around data loss prevention."

"Sometimes when you call in support, you get someone who is just following a sheet. It feels like a runaround. You feel that you are running into that support wall."

"The reporting feature needs improvement. It doesn't give you the expected results. It is quite difficult to get the specific reports needed, and it is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform."

"Sometimes, obviously, there are bugs."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"Their on-premise hardware's network interface is capped at one gigabit, which is sort of a problem. If you stand a filter up where all traffic flows through that, according to them, in order to go above a gigabit, you have to have multiple devices, which in today's IT seems a little bit silly. They could easily put in an SFP port into their device that could accommodate 10 gigs or at least offer a box."

"Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern."

More iboss cons

"What can be improved is the login banner resizing. Currently, it is not fully compatible and could benefit from being a full-screen size banner on the Mac device."

"The configuration could be faster."

"Jamf Connect is beginning to implement Multi-Factor Authentication for offline authentication, but the setup documentation is insufficient."

"There is room for improvement with Jamf Connect in reducing its cost and overcoming limitations during pre-stage enrollment, which prevent it from creating MDM-capable users."

"We've had some issues when users restart their devices because the device asks for credentials afterward. Jamf Connect asks for a username, password, and MFA."

"The main use case for Jamf Connect was to synchronize local accounts with the identity provider, like Entra. However, due to some limitations with the enrollment sequence and user limitations, we decided to discontinue using it."

"The solution’s technical support is bad and should be improved."

"The logs are an area with a shortcoming."

More Jamf Connect cons

"Some areas for improvement include the SSL inspection, as decrypting and inspecting encrypted traffic induces latency."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It's relatively inexpensive."

"The pricing is good."

"The pricing model could be improved, especially considering the availability of alternative MDM solutions like Kandji, which offers similar features for free or at a lower cost."

"I rate the cost as three out of ten, with ten being the highest."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"Jamf Connect has a yearly licensing cost, which is expensive."

"The pricing is definitely on the higher side."

"We pay 2 dollars per device monthly. For the plus version, you have to pay 4 dollars per month. I think the product will give discounts based on the number of users and devices."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company Exxon...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

Previously when I used iboss, we did the POC for iboss for ExxonMobil. Four or five people wanted to move from our ol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern. There are cheaper alte...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Connect?

Jamf Connect requires a per-device license fee, which becomes quite expensive given our large company size. Each devi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jamf Connect?

There is room for improvement with Jamf Connect in reducing its cost and overcoming limitations during pre-stage enro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jamf Connect?

The main use case for Jamf Connect was to synchronize local accounts with the identity provider, like Entra. However,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler B2B?

Zscaler B2B operates on a subscription-based pricing model with various bundles. Specific pricing details are not ava...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler B2B?

Some areas for improvement include the SSL inspection, as decrypting and inspecting encrypted traffic induces latency...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zscaler B2B?

I use Zscaler B2B ( /products/zscaler-b2b-reviews ) for a variety of purposes including Zero Trust Network Access ( /...

See all answers

Comparisons

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 12% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Okta Platform vs Jamf Connect

Compared 22% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Jamf Connect

Compared 11% of the time

Netskope Private Access vs Jamf Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Lookout vs Jamf Connect

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Jamf Connect

Compared 4% of the time

More Jamf Connect Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler B2B

Compared 19% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler B2B

Compared 16% of the time

Axis Security vs Zscaler B2B

Compared 16% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Zscaler B2B

Compared 13% of the time

Google BeyondCorp Remote Access vs Zscaler B2B

Compared 12% of the time

More Zscaler B2B Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

January 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Connect

January 2026

Download Jamf Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA as a Service

January 2026

Download Zscaler B2B product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

Wandera, Wandera Private Access

ZB2B

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

Wandera Threat Defense helps businesses ensure a productive workforce, by defending both managed and unmanaged devices against the full spectrum of mobile threats. The solution includes security protections on the device and in the network, allowing for effective and targeted policy actions against even the most sophisticated attacks. Wandera Threat Defense is powered by MI:RIAM, a leading threat intelligence engine that learns in real-time through signals from 425 million sensors around the globe.

JAMF

Zscaler B2B (ZB2B) is a cloud service that provides your business customers fast, seamless, and secure access to applications over the internet, whether they’re hosted in the data center or public and private clouds.

ZB2B is based on a service-initiated zero trust network access (ZTNA) architecture and uses business policies to securely connect an authenticated customer to an authorized app, without ever exposing the app to the internet or bringing the customer on your network.

ZB2B brings cloud scale and agility to customer access by eliminating the complexity and friction of legacy network and security infrastructures.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

Mastercard, Deloitte, PayPal, Toshiba, BNP Paribas, EY, Otis, Rollins, Eurostar, Frontier, Sealy, Rolex, VITAS Healthcare

Sanmina Corporation, MAN Energy Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Okta and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.